Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Wyoming 2 4.8 (4.1, 5.6) 51 (50, 51) 40 stable stable trend -5.0 (-15.5, 0.6)
Vermont 2 5.9 (5.2, 6.7) 50 (44, 51) 59 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.5, 1.1)
Nebraska 2 6.1 (5.7, 6.6) 49 (45, 50) 148 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 2.0)
North Dakota 2 6.5 (5.8, 7.3) 48 (34, 50) 61 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.2, 6.6)
New Hampshire 2 6.6 (6.1, 7.2) 47 (38, 50) 136 stable stable trend -1.7 (-11.0, 3.2)
South Dakota 2 6.8 (6.1, 7.5) 46 (32, 50) 80 stable stable trend -1.7 (-11.2, 3.2)
Utah 7 7.0 (6.6, 7.5) 45 (34, 48) 214 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 3.2)
Maine 2 7.1 (6.6, 7.6) 44 (31, 49) 152 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.0, 4.2)
Colorado 2 7.1 (6.8, 7.4) 43 (35, 48) 494 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.4, -0.1)
Kansas 2 7.2 (6.8, 7.6) 42 (33, 48) 269 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.9, 1.6)
Montana 2 7.2 (6.6, 7.8) 41 (26, 49) 116 rising rising trend 4.1 (3.0, 5.5)
Michigan 2 7.2 (7.0, 7.4) 40 (35, 47) 1,004 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.4, -0.1)
Iowa 7 7.4 (7.0, 7.8) 39 (31, 46) 314 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.6)
Nevada 2 7.4 (7.0, 7.8) 38 (30, 47) 293 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.2)
Wisconsin 2 7.4 (7.2, 7.7) 37 (32, 45) 601 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 0.8)
Virginia 2 7.5 (7.2, 7.7) 36 (32, 44) 828 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.3, 2.3)
Idaho 7 7.5 (7.0, 8.1) 35 (23, 47) 176 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 1.1)
Ohio 2 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) 34 (31, 40) 1,236 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.5)
Puerto Rico 2 7.8 (7.5, 8.2) N/A 405 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.6, -0.1)
Arizona 2 7.9 (7.6, 8.2) 33 (23, 37) 773 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.0, -0.4)
New Jersey 7 8.0 (7.8, 8.2) 32 (22, 35) 969 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.1, 0.1)
South Carolina 2 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 31 (19, 36) 578 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.7, 1.6)
Minnesota 2 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 30 (18, 36) 581 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.3, 2.8)
Connecticut 7 8.1 (7.7, 8.4) 29 (15, 36) 405 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.5)
New York 7 8.1 (8.0, 8.3) 28 (21, 33) 2,146 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.8)
Indiana 2 8.2 (7.9, 8.5) 27 (16, 34) 710 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.2, -2.1)
Illinois 7 8.2 (8.0, 8.4) 26 (18, 33) 1,332 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.6)
Delaware 2 8.2 (7.6, 8.9) 25 (7, 41) 121 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 1.2)
Pennsylvania 2 8.3 (8.1, 8.5) 24 (16, 31) 1,542 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.9, -0.2)
West Virginia 2 8.3 (7.8, 8.8) 23 (9, 35) 225 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.0, 3.9)
Florida 2 8.3 (8.2, 8.5) 22 (16, 29) 2,741 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.3)
Massachusetts 2 8.4 (8.1, 8.7) 21 (11, 31) 785 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.3, -2.2)
Maryland 2 8.4 (8.2, 8.7) 20 (11, 31) 669 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.5, -0.5)
Missouri 2 8.5 (8.2, 8.8) 19 (10, 29) 712 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 2.3)
Tennessee 2 8.6 (8.3, 8.8) 18 (9, 27) 784 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 0.1)
Georgia 7 8.6 (8.3, 8.8) 17 (10, 26) 1,089 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.0)
Alabama 2 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 16 (9, 28) 589 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 3.5)
Rhode Island 2 8.6 (7.9, 9.3) 15 (4, 35) 129 stable stable trend -6.0 (-12.7, 1.1)
Washington 1 8.6 (8.4, 8.9) 14 (8, 25) 836 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.3, -1.9)
Mississippi 2 8.7 (8.3, 9.1) 13 (7, 28) 339 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 1.4)
Oregon 2 8.8 (8.5, 9.2) 12 (6, 24) 516 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.4, -2.7)
Arkansas 2 8.9 (8.5, 9.4) 11 (5, 24) 357 stable stable trend 0.2 (-6.8, 4.0)
North Carolina 2 9.0 (8.7, 9.2) 10 (6, 17) 1,231 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.3)
Hawaii 7 9.2 (8.6, 9.8) 9 (4, 25) 187 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -1.7)
Kentucky 7 9.2 (8.8, 9.5) 8 (4, 15) 546 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 2.5)
Oklahoma 2 9.3 (9.0, 9.7) 7 (4, 14) 469 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.7, 3.9)
Alaska 2 9.5 (8.5, 10.5) 6 (2, 29) 76 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 3.3)
California 7 9.6 (9.4, 9.7) 5 (4, 8) 4,510 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.7)
New Mexico 7 9.8 (9.3, 10.3) 4 (3, 11) 285 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.7, -0.2)
Louisiana 7 10.7 (10.3, 11.0) 3 (2, 4) 646 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.5, 2.7)
District of Columbia 2 11.1 (10.1, 12.3) 2 (1, 5) 79 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -1.0)
Texas 7 12.6 (12.4, 12.8) 1 (1, 2) 4,022 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/18/2026 10:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top