Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 8.3 (8.2, 8.3) 32,027 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.7)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 12.6 (11.4, 13.9) 87 stable stable trend -3.0 (-11.7, 6.6)
Texas 6,10 *** 11.6 (11.4, 11.7) 3,212 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.4)
Hawaii 7,8 *** 11.3 (10.6, 12.1) 206 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.9, 3.8)
New Mexico 7,8 *** 10.2 (9.7, 10.8) 262 rising rising trend 3.4 (2.8, 3.9)
Louisiana 7,8 *** 9.8 (9.4, 10.2) 548 rising rising trend 3.8 (3.2, 4.4)
California 7,8 *** 9.7 (9.6, 9.9) 4,160 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 1.2)
Washington 5,10 *** 9.0 (8.7, 9.3) 776 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.7)
New York 7,8 *** 9.0 (8.8, 9.1) 2,171 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.0, 2.3)
Oregon 6,10 *** 8.9 (8.5, 9.3) 472 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.3, 4.8)
Alaska 6,10 *** 8.8 (7.8, 9.9) 66 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.5, 5.0)
Delaware 6,10 *** 8.8 (8.1, 9.6) 109 stable stable trend 0.7 (-12.5, 16.0)
Maryland 6,10 *** 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 619 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.5, 8.0)
Kentucky 7,8 *** 8.4 (8.0, 8.7) 456 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.7, 7.6)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 8.3 (7.9, 8.7) 388 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.4, 7.5)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 8.3 (8.1, 8.5) 1,428 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.8, 7.0)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 8.3 (8.1, 8.5) 1,008 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.7, 6.4)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 8.3 (7.9, 8.7) 297 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.8, 8.6)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 8.2 (7.5, 8.9) 111 stable stable trend -0.8 (-9.9, 9.2)
Georgia 7,8 *** 8.1 (7.8, 8.3) 897 rising rising trend 5.1 (4.5, 5.7)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 8.0 (7.7, 8.4) 374 stable stable trend 1.7 (-6.3, 10.4)
Massachusetts 7,8 *** 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 678 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 656 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.1, 9.3)
Arizona 6,10 *** 7.9 (7.6, 8.2) 654 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Connecticut 7,8 *** 7.9 (7.5, 8.3) 371 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.7, 5.3)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 7.8 (7.5, 8.1) 485 stable stable trend 2.6 (-6.8, 13.1)
Florida 6,10 *** 7.7 (7.6, 7.9) 2,175 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.6, 5.5)
New Jersey 7,8 *** 7.7 (7.4, 7.9) 846 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.6, -1.0)
Missouri 6,10 *** 7.6 (7.4, 7.9) 587 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.7)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 7.6 (7.2, 8.0) 280 stable stable trend 5.8 (-1.9, 14.0)
Illinois 6,10 *** 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) 1,152 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 5.5)
Alabama 6,10 *** 7.5 (7.2, 7.8) 458 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.2, 8.3)
Colorado 6,10 *** 7.3 (7.0, 7.6) 442 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.4, 8.2)
Kansas 6,10 *** 7.2 (6.8, 7.7) 252 stable stable trend 3.5 (-5.5, 13.4)
Indiana 6,10 *** 7.1 (6.9, 7.4) 569 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.8, 5.2)
Virginia 6,10 *** 7.1 (6.9, 7.4) 704 stable stable trend 5.6 (-3.0, 15.0)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 7.1 (6.8, 7.4) 510 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.6, 6.2)
Idaho 7,8 *** 7.1 (6.5, 7.6) 137 rising rising trend 6.3 (5.1, 7.4)
Ohio 6,10 *** 7.0 (6.8, 7.2) 1,038 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 4.9)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 6.9 (6.6, 7.2) 453 stable stable trend 4.4 (-4.0, 13.6)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 6.9 (6.4, 7.3) 179 stable stable trend 6.2 (-2.9, 16.2)
Michigan 5,10 *** 6.9 # (6.7, 7.1) 884 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Nevada 6,10 *** 6.8 (6.4, 7.2) 227 stable stable trend 0.6 (-7.9, 9.8)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 6.7 (5.9, 7.4) 68 stable stable trend 8.4 (-7.5, 27.0)
Iowa 7,8 *** 6.5 (6.2, 6.9) 257 rising rising trend 4.0 (3.5, 4.5)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 6.2 (5.7, 6.7) 111 stable stable trend 5.5 (-5.2, 17.4)
Utah 7,8 *** 6.1 (5.7, 6.6) 158 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.6, 6.3)
Montana 6,10 *** 6.1 (5.5, 6.7) 84 stable stable trend 3.0 (-11.6, 20.0)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 5.8 (5.0, 6.7) 44 stable stable trend 8.5 (-9.5, 30.1)
Maine 6,10 *** 5.6 (5.1, 6.1) 108 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.6, 3.4)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 5.6 (5.1, 6.0) 125 stable stable trend 1.3 (-9.2, 13.0)
Vermont 6,10 *** 5.4 (4.7, 6.2) 47 stable stable trend -5.0 (-10.1, 0.3)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 4.2 (3.6, 4.8) 36 stable stable trend 7.9 (-15.3, 37.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/30/2020 10:31 pm.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission and SEER November 2018 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2018 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2018 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top