Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Breast (All Stages^), 2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 124.2 (123.7, 124.7) 245,299 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
New Hampshire 2,10 *** 145.6 (137.4, 154.2) 1,304 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 5.3)
Massachusetts 7,8 *** 139.2 (135.6, 142.9) 6,025 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.7)
Connecticut 7,8 *** 139.0 (134.1, 144.1) 3,260 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
North Dakota 2,10 *** 137.9 (126.1, 150.4) 561 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.6, 9.6)
Rhode Island 2,10 *** 135.4 (126.4, 144.8) 924 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
North Carolina 2,10 *** 133.9 (131.0, 136.9) 8,569 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.0)
Illinois 2,10 *** 133.3 (130.7, 136.0) 10,392 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.7)
New Jersey 7,8 *** 133.3 (130.2, 136.4) 7,632 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.4, -0.2)
Delaware 2,10 *** 133.3 (124.0, 143.1) 841 stable stable trend 0.3 (-6.1, 7.2)
Hawaii 7,8 *** 133.2 (125.5, 141.4) 1,201 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Pennsylvania 2,10 *** 132.8 (130.2, 135.4) 11,287 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Washington 4,10 *** 132.6 (129.1, 136.2) 5,768 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Kansas 2,10 *** 132.3 (126.7, 138.1) 2,262 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.0)
Missouri 2,10 *** 132.0 (128.2, 135.9) 5,034 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.0)
Vermont 2,10 *** 130.5 (119.2, 142.6) 553 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.4)
Wisconsin 2,10 *** 130.3 (126.4, 134.2) 4,689 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Iowa 7,8 *** 129.4 (124.2, 134.9) 2,496 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
New York 7,8 *** 129.1 (127.1, 131.2) 16,057 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.4)
Ohio 2,10 *** 128.7 (126.1, 131.4) 9,648 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.7)
Minnesota 2,10 *** 128.6 (124.7, 132.7) 4,274 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 2.9)
Maryland 2,10 *** 128.6 (124.8, 132.4) 4,815 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.9)
South Carolina 2,10 *** 128.3 (124.3, 132.4) 4,155 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Georgia 7,8 *** 127.6 (124.7, 130.6) 7,633 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
Nebraska 2,10 *** 127.5 (120.7, 134.5) 1,432 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.6, 3.0)
Colorado 2,10 *** 127.4 (123.4, 131.6) 3,959 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.4)
Virginia 2,10 *** 126.4 (123.3, 129.6) 6,455 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.9)
Kentucky 7,8 *** 126.1 (121.8, 130.5) 3,482 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
Oklahoma 2,10 *** 125.9 (121.2, 130.7) 2,930 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.7, 2.5)
Maine 2,10 *** 125.8 (118.3, 133.7) 1,187 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.8)
Montana 2,10 *** 125.1 (116.3, 134.5) 836 stable stable trend 3.0 (-3.2, 9.6)
Louisiana 7,8 *** 123.9 (119.6, 128.2) 3,492 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
Michigan 4,10 *** 123.3 # (120.5, 126.2) 7,799 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
District of Columbia 2,10 *** 123.3 (111.8, 135.7) 445 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.9, 2.1)
Idaho 7,8 *** 122.8 (115.7, 130.2) 1,203 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Alabama 2,10 *** 122.4 (118.4, 126.5) 3,810 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.2)
Mississippi 2,10 *** 121.7 (116.6, 127.1) 2,218 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.7)
Arkansas 2,10 *** 119.9 (114.8, 125.1) 2,247 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.1)
Tennessee 2,10 *** 119.2 (115.8, 122.7) 4,993 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.9)
Oregon 2,10 *** 118.6 (114.3, 123.1) 3,080 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
California 7,8 *** 118.3 (116.8, 119.8) 26,470 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Wyoming 2,10 *** 117.8 (106.2, 130.4) 410 stable stable trend 1.2 (-6.9, 10.0)
Indiana 2,10 *** 117.6 (114.1, 121.1) 4,741 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.1)
West Virginia 2,10 *** 117.0 (110.8, 123.5) 1,470 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.7)
Florida 2,10 *** 116.5 (114.7, 118.4) 16,601 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Arizona 2,10 *** 115.0 (111.7, 118.4) 4,890 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.3)
Alaska 2,10 *** 114.8 (103.5, 127.1) 411 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.6)
Utah 7,8 *** 114.4 (108.7, 120.3) 1,560 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Nevada 2,10 *** 111.7 (106.6, 117.0) 1,925 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.3)
South Dakota 2,10 *** 111.4 (102.0, 121.4) 569 falling falling trend -6.2 (-11.8, -0.3)
Texas 2,10 *** 107.6 (105.9, 109.4) 15,897 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
New Mexico 7,8 *** 106.6 (100.8, 112.6) 1,395 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Puerto Rico 2,10 *** 95.7 (91.6, 99.9) 2,259 stable stable trend -0.0 (-3.8, 4.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/17/2019 1:21 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission and SEER November 2018 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
4 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics . State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2018 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2018 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top