Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Cervix (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 7.2?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 No 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) N/A 13,012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Puerto Rico 6 No 12.6 (11.9, 13.4) N/A 236 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -2.3)
Kentucky 7 No 9.8 (9.2, 10.4) 1 (1, 10) 224 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.6)
West Virginia 6 No 9.7 (8.7, 10.6) 2 (1, 16) 93 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Mississippi 6 No 9.5 (8.8, 10.3) 3 (1, 13) 150
*
*
Arkansas 6 No 9.5 (8.8, 10.2) 4 (1, 14) 146 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Oklahoma 6 No 9.5 (8.8, 10.1) 5 (1, 13) 184 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Louisiana 7 No 9.4 (8.8, 10.0) 6 (1, 13) 224 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Alabama 6 No 9.4 (8.8, 9.9) 7 (1, 13) 240 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Texas 6 No 9.3 (9.1, 9.6) 8 (2, 11) 1,284 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Nevada 6 No 9.1 (8.3, 9.9) 9 (1, 21) 107
*
*
Florida 6 No 9.1 (8.8, 9.3) 10 (4, 13) 1,030 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
New Mexico 7 No 8.5 (7.7, 9.4) 11 (3, 31) 86 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Tennessee 6 No 8.5 (8.0, 8.9) 12 (8, 23) 302 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Indiana 6 No 8.3 (7.8, 8.7) 13 (10, 26) 279 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.0, 5.3)
Delaware 6 No 8.3 (7.1, 9.5) 14 (1, 39) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Kansas 6 No 8.3 (7.6, 9.0) 15 (6, 31) 117 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.3)
District of Columbia 6 No 8.2 (6.9, 9.7) 16 (1, 42) 30 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.6)
Missouri 6 No 8.1 (7.7, 8.6) 17 (10, 28) 256 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Iowa 7 No 8.0 (7.4, 8.7) 18 (9, 34) 123 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.9, 5.9)
Georgia 7 No 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 19 (12, 28) 432 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Alaska 6 No 7.9 (6.6, 9.4) 20 (1, 45) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Ohio 6 No 7.9 (7.5, 8.2) 21 (12, 30) 479 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
New Jersey 7 No 7.9 (7.5, 8.2) 22 (13, 30) 389 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
South Carolina 6 No 7.8 (7.3, 8.3) 23 (11, 33) 208 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Illinois 6 No 7.7 (7.4, 8.0) 24 (14, 31) 531 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
New York 7 No 7.7 (7.4, 7.9) 25 (17, 31) 843 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Nebraska 6 No 7.6 (6.8, 8.5) 26 (10, 41) 71 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Wyoming 6 No 7.4 (6.0, 9.0) 27 (2, 49) 22 stable stable trend 12.4 (-13.2, 45.6)
Rhode Island 6 No 7.3 (6.3, 8.5) 28 (10, 45) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.3)
California 7 No 7.3 (7.2, 7.5) 29 (24, 34) 1,483 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Pennsylvania 6 No 7.3 (7.0, 7.6) 30 (22, 36) 505 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Idaho 7 Yes 7.1 (6.3, 8.0) 31 (13, 45) 58 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
North Carolina 6 Yes 7.1 (6.8, 7.4) 32 (25, 39) 387 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Montana 6 Yes 7.0 (6.0, 8.2) 33 (11, 47) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Oregon 6 Yes 7.0 (6.5, 7.5) 34 (22, 43) 148 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Hawaii 7 Yes 6.9 (6.1, 7.9) 35 (14, 46) 50 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
South Dakota 6 Yes 6.9 (5.8, 8.2) 36 (11, 49) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Michigan 5 Yes 6.8 (6.5, 7.2) 37 (27, 42) 352 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Washington 5 Yes 6.7 (6.3, 7.1) 38 (29, 44) 250 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Maryland 6 Yes 6.7 (6.3, 7.1) 39 (29, 44) 224 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Wisconsin 6 Yes 6.6 (6.2, 7.0) 40 (29, 45) 196 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Arizona 6 Yes 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 41 (31, 45) 223 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Colorado 6 Yes 6.3 (5.9, 6.8) 42 (33, 46) 178 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Virginia 6 Yes 6.1 (5.8, 6.5) 43 (37, 47) 274 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
North Dakota 6 Yes 6.0 (4.8, 7.3) 44 (21, 51) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.5)
Connecticut 7 Yes 5.8 (5.3, 6.3) 45 (38, 50) 113 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Maine 6 Yes 5.6 (4.8, 6.5) 46 (33, 51) 42 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Massachusetts 7 Yes 5.5 (5.1, 5.8) 47 (43, 50) 205 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Minnesota 6 Yes 5.4 (5.0, 5.8) 48 (43, 51) 152 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Utah 7 Yes 5.4 (4.8, 6.0) 49 (42, 51) 73 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.7)
New Hampshire 6 Yes 5.1 (4.3, 5.9) 50 (42, 51) 37 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Vermont 6 Yes 3.9 (3.0, 5.1) 51 (46, 51) 13
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/23/2021 7:34 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top