Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Cervix (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 7.5 (7.5, 7.6) N/A 12,670 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.5)
Alabama 6 9.3 (8.8, 9.9) 6 (1, 12) 242 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 4.1)
Alaska 6 7.0 (5.8, 8.4) 27 (9, 48) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Arizona 6 6.4 (6.0, 6.8) 37 (27, 45) 227 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Arkansas 6 9.5 (8.8, 10.2) 5 (1, 12) 144 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
California 7 7.3 (7.1, 7.4) 22 (19, 29) 1,470 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.6)
Colorado 6 6.0 (5.6, 6.5) 41 (31, 47) 176 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Connecticut 7 5.2 (4.8, 5.7) 48 (41, 50) 103 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Delaware 6 7.1 (6.1, 8.2) 26 (10, 46) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
District of Columbia 6 7.8 (6.5, 9.3) 17 (2, 44) 28 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.6)
Florida 6 9.2 (8.9, 9.5) 8 (3, 11) 1,078 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Georgia 7 8.0 (7.7, 8.4) 14 (10, 21) 444 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.1, 3.5)
Hawaii 7 6.6 (5.8, 7.6) 33 (15, 46) 51 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Idaho 7 6.8 (6.0, 7.7) 30 (14, 46) 59 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.0)
Illinois 7 7.2 (6.9, 7.5) 23 (18, 33) 493 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.0, 0.4)
Iowa 7 7.6 (7.0, 8.3) 19 (10, 33) 116 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 6.0)
Kansas 6 8.2 (7.5, 8.9) 13 (6, 25) 114 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Kentucky 7 9.7 (9.1, 10.3) 3 (1, 11) 222 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 3.3)
Louisiana 7 9.2 (8.7, 9.8) 7 (1, 13) 221 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Maine 6 6.3 (5.5, 7.2) 39 (18, 49) 46 stable stable trend 8.1 (-2.3, 16.0)
Maryland 6 6.4 (6.0, 6.8) 38 (28, 45) 217 stable stable trend -0.5 (-8.7, 5.1)
Massachusetts 7 4.8 (4.5, 5.1) 50 (47, 50) 183 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Michigan 6 6.6 (6.3, 6.9) 35 (26, 42) 337 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Minnesota 6 5.4 (5.0, 5.8) 47 (41, 50) 157 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Mississippi 6 9.2 (8.5, 9.9) 9 (1, 14) 142 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Missouri 6 8.3 (7.9, 8.8) 12 (8, 20) 263 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Montana 6 6.7 (5.7, 7.8) 32 (12, 48) 36 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Nebraska 6 7.4 (6.6, 8.3) 21 (10, 39) 68 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Nevada 6 8.4 (7.7, 9.1) 11 (5, 21) 130 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
New Hampshire 6 5.2 (4.4, 6.0) 49 (36, 50) 39 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.7, 13.5)
New Jersey 7 7.2 (6.9, 7.5) 24 (17, 33) 369 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
New Mexico 7 7.9 (7.2, 8.8) 16 (7, 32) 82 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 9.0)
New York 7 7.1 (6.9, 7.4) 25 (19, 32) 800 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
North Carolina 6 6.9 (6.6, 7.2) 29 (21, 38) 383 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
North Dakota 6 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) 45 (20, 50) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 2.0)
Ohio 6 7.8 (7.5, 8.1) 18 (12, 24) 476 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Oklahoma 6 10.2 (9.6, 10.9) 1 (1, 8) 196 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Oregon 6 6.6 (6.1, 7.1) 36 (22, 44) 144 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Pennsylvania 6 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) 28 (20, 36) 487 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Puerto Rico 6 11.6 (10.8, 12.4) N/A 191 falling falling trend -7.2 (-13.4, -0.5)
Rhode Island 6 6.8 (5.8, 7.8) 31 (12, 48) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
South Carolina 6 7.9 (7.4, 8.5) 15 (10, 25) 214 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
South Dakota 6 6.2 (5.1, 7.4) 40 (16, 50) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.0)
Tennessee 6 7.6 (7.2, 8.0) 20 (12, 29) 275 falling falling trend -5.7 (-11.1, -0.6)
Texas 7 9.6 (9.4, 9.9) 4 (1, 8) 1,361 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.9)
Utah 7 6.0 (5.4, 6.6) 42 (29, 49) 86 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.4, 10.6)
Vermont 6 5.6 (4.5, 6.9) 46 (20, 50) 19
*
*
Virginia 6 5.9 (5.6, 6.3) 43 (36, 47) 271 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Washington 5 6.6 (6.2, 7.0) 34 (24, 42) 257 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
West Virginia 6 9.7 (8.8, 10.7) 2 (1, 12) 92 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Wisconsin 6 5.8 (5.4, 6.3) 44 (35, 48) 174 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Wyoming 6 9.0 (7.4, 10.7) 10 (1, 33) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 2.9)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 6:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
Data not available for this combination of data selections.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top