Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 101.4 (100.9, 101.8) 192,443 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.9)
Puerto Rico 2,10 *** 139.2 (134.3, 144.3) 3,066 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.7)
New Jersey 7,8 *** 135.7 (132.5, 139.0) 7,141 falling falling trend -11.2 (-18.6, -3.1)
Georgia 7,8 *** 132.8 (129.7, 136.1) 7,160 stable stable trend 0.3 (-6.6, 7.8)
Louisiana 7,8 *** 131.8 (127.3, 136.4) 3,516 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.8, -2.6)
Montana 2,10 *** 125.3 (117.1, 134.0) 927 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.2, 10.0)
Mississippi 2,10 *** 123.6 (118.2, 129.1) 2,143 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.4)
New York 7,8 *** 123.2 (121.1, 125.3) 14,175 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.9, 3.2)
Alabama 2,10 *** 122.3 (118.2, 126.5) 3,597 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.0, 6.0)
Maryland 2,10 *** 120.9 (117.1, 124.8) 4,149 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Delaware 2,10 *** 120.8 (112.1, 130.0) 753 stable stable trend -4.5 (-9.5, 0.7)
District of Columbia 2,10 *** 116.8 (104.6, 129.9) 359 stable stable trend -7.8 (-15.9, 1.0)
North Dakota 2,10 *** 113.9 (103.8, 124.7) 499 stable stable trend -0.0 (-9.2, 10.1)
Connecticut 7,8 *** 113.2 (108.7, 117.8) 2,550 stable stable trend -0.9 (-9.2, 8.2)
North Carolina 2,10 *** 112.7 (109.9, 115.5) 6,695 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
South Dakota 2,10 *** 112.6 (103.6, 122.2) 615 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Nebraska 2,10 *** 112.2 (106.0, 118.8) 1,257 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.5)
Utah 7,8 *** 111.8 (106.0, 117.8) 1,471 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.8, 2.4)
Tennessee 2,10 *** 111.7 (108.3, 115.1) 4,478 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.3, 4.5)
Arkansas 2,10 *** 111.6 (106.7, 116.7) 2,032 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.6, 6.1)
South Carolina 2,10 *** 111.6 (107.8, 115.4) 3,498 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.1, 5.3)
Wyoming 2,10 *** 111.5 (100.5, 123.4) 408 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.2, 9.7)
Wisconsin 2,10 *** 109.4 (105.9, 112.9) 4,047 stable stable trend -0.0 (-3.5, 3.5)
Pennsylvania 2,10 *** 106.6 (104.4, 108.9) 8,853 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.1, 5.7)
New Hampshire 2,10 *** 106.1 (99.4, 113.3) 984 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.8, 3.6)
Michigan 4,10 *** 105.9 # (103.3, 108.6) 6,686 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.4, 2.1)
Iowa 7,8 *** 105.7 (101.1, 110.5) 2,059 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.3, 5.0)
Illinois 2,10 *** 105.6 (103.2, 108.0) 7,762 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.3)
Idaho 7,8 *** 105.0 (98.5, 111.8) 1,030 stable stable trend -3.6 (-11.3, 4.8)
Kansas 2,10 *** 101.8 (96.9, 106.9) 1,695 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.6, 1.3)
Minnesota 2,10 *** 101.5 (98.0, 105.1) 3,364 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.4, 4.9)
Kentucky 7,8 *** 101.4 (97.5, 105.4) 2,722 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.8, -2.5)
Ohio 2,10 *** 100.7 (98.3, 103.1) 7,316 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.2)
Virginia 2,10 *** 97.3 (94.5, 100.2) 4,757 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.8, 3.2)
Washington 4,10 *** 97.3 (94.3, 100.4) 4,157 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.0, 1.2)
Massachusetts 7,8 *** 94.8 (91.8, 97.9) 3,924 stable stable trend -3.2 (-11.0, 5.2)
West Virginia 2,10 *** 94.4 (89.0, 100.1) 1,213 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.5, 5.4)
Rhode Island 2,10 *** 94.0 (86.4, 102.1) 607 stable stable trend -3.2 (-8.4, 2.3)
Hawaii 7,8 *** 93.8 (87.4, 100.6) 839 stable stable trend 4.0 (-6.4, 15.6)
Oklahoma 2,10 *** 93.7 (89.6, 97.9) 2,104 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.7, 3.7)
Alaska 2,10 *** 93.6 (83.3, 104.8) 362 stable stable trend -0.1 (-14.6, 16.9)
Indiana 2,10 *** 89.5 (86.4, 92.6) 3,424 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Texas 2,10 *** 89.2 (87.6, 90.9) 11,970 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
Missouri 2,10 *** 88.3 (85.3, 91.5) 3,313 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.8, 2.8)
Oregon 2,10 *** 86.7 (83.1, 90.4) 2,305 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Florida 2,10 *** 86.4 (84.9, 88.0) 12,434 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.5, -2.0)
Colorado 2,10 *** 85.9 (82.5, 89.4) 2,610 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.3, -3.0)
California 7,8 *** 85.1 (83.8, 86.4) 17,793 falling falling trend -7.3 (-9.1, -5.5)
Vermont 2,10 *** 83.9 (75.3, 93.3) 372 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.2, 3.1)
Maine 2,10 *** 81.7 (76.0, 87.7) 815 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.9, 4.0)
New Mexico 7,8 *** 79.7 (74.8, 84.9) 1,039 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.3, 4.4)
Nevada 2,10 *** 77.9 (73.7, 82.2) 1,389 falling falling trend -7.5 (-13.4, -1.2)
Arizona 2,10 *** 72.3 (69.7, 74.9) 3,061 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.3, 6.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/17/2019 12:18 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission and SEER November 2018 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
4 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics . State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2018 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2018 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top