Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 17.1 (17.0, 17.1) N/A 64,622 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Wyoming 6 *** 14.3 (13.0, 15.7) 47 (32, 51) 97 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 2.7)
Wisconsin 6 *** 18.8 (18.3, 19.2) 14 (9, 18) 1,328 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.1, 2.2)
West Virginia 6 *** 20.8 (19.9, 21.6) 5 (2, 9) 507 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.8, 3.1)
Washington 5 *** 15.5 (15.1, 15.8) 41 (34, 45) 1,300 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Virginia 6 *** 15.5 (15.1, 15.8) 40 (34, 45) 1,517 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Vermont 6 *** 15.4 (14.2, 16.7) 42 (24, 50) 127 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Utah 7 *** 14.2 (13.6, 14.9) 49 (43, 50) 380 rising rising trend 2.7 (2.2, 3.1)
Texas 6 *** 19.4 (19.2, 19.6) 10 (7, 13) 5,432 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
Tennessee 6 *** 19.5 (19.0, 19.9) 9 (6, 14) 1,554 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.8, 2.9)
South Dakota 6 *** 17.5 (16.4, 18.8) 22 (9, 38) 179 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.5)
South Carolina 6 *** 17.9 (17.4, 18.4) 18 (13, 26) 1,104 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.0, 2.1)
Rhode Island 6 *** 16.1 (15.1, 17.1) 34 (21, 47) 211 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Puerto Rico 6 *** 8.8 (8.4, 9.3) N/A 390 stable stable trend 0.0 (-7.7, 8.3)
Pennsylvania 6 *** 17.6 (17.3, 17.9) 20 (16, 27) 2,870 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.2)
Oregon 6 *** 15.8 (15.3, 16.3) 38 (30, 44) 798 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Oklahoma 6 *** 20.4 (19.8, 21.0) 6 (3, 9) 917 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.8)
Ohio 6 *** 17.6 (17.3, 17.9) 21 (16, 27) 2,503 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.8, 1.7)
North Dakota 6 *** 17.7 (16.4, 19.1) 19 (7, 37) 148 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.2, 2.6)
North Carolina 6 *** 17.4 (17.0, 17.7) 24 (18, 29) 2,101 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.7)
New York 7 *** 16.9 (16.6, 17.1) 29 (24, 32) 3,978 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
New Mexico 7 *** 15.6 (14.8, 16.3) 39 (29, 47) 382 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.5, 2.0)
New Jersey 7 *** 16.5 (16.2, 16.9) 32 (26, 36) 1,779 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.2)
New Hampshire 6 *** 16.0 (15.1, 16.9) 36 (23, 46) 279 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.6)
Nevada 6 *** 15.1 (14.4, 15.8) 44 (34, 49) 403
*
*
Nebraska 6 *** 18.3 (17.4, 19.1) 15 (8, 27) 397 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.5)
Montana 6 *** 17.1 (16.0, 18.1) 27 (14, 41) 229 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.5, 3.1)
Missouri 6 *** 19.1 (18.7, 19.6) 11 (7, 16) 1,416 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.7, 2.0)
Mississippi 6 *** 22.3 (21.6, 23.0) 1 (1, 4) 769
*
*
Minnesota 6 *** 17.5 (17.0, 17.9) 23 (16, 30) 1,131 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.7, 1.7)
Michigan 5 *** 16.5 (16.2, 16.9) 31 (26, 37) 2,027 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Massachusetts 7 *** 16.0 (15.6, 16.4) 35 (29, 42) 1,326 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Maryland 6 *** 15.3 (14.9, 15.8) 43 (35, 47) 1,077 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Maine 6 *** 17.1 (16.3, 18.0) 26 (15, 38) 324 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.6)
Louisiana 7 *** 22.2 (21.6, 22.8) 2 (1, 4) 1,186 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Kentucky 7 *** 21.1 (20.5, 21.6) 4 (2, 6) 1,113 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Kansas 6 *** 19.5 (18.8, 20.2) 8 (5, 15) 649 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.6, 2.6)
Iowa 7 *** 19.7 (19.0, 20.3) 7 (5, 14) 744 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.9, 1.9)
Indiana 6 *** 19.1 (18.7, 19.6) 12 (7, 15) 1,470 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.5)
Illinois 6 *** 18.2 (17.9, 18.5) 16 (13, 20) 2,704 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
Idaho 7 *** 16.6 (15.8, 17.4) 30 (19, 43) 318 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.1)
Hawaii 7 *** 13.3 (12.5, 14.1) 50 (47, 51) 234 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.6)
Georgia 7 *** 17.2 (16.9, 17.6) 25 (18, 30) 1,933 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.4, 2.3)
Florida 6 *** 14.9 (14.7, 15.1) 45 (42, 48) 4,173 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5)
District of Columbia 6 *** 12.6 (11.4, 13.9) 51 (47, 51) 86 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Delaware 6 *** 17.0 (15.9, 18.1) 28 (14, 41) 208 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Connecticut 7 *** 16.0 (15.5, 16.5) 37 (28, 44) 719 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Colorado 6 *** 14.2 (13.8, 14.7) 48 (45, 50) 858 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.0)
California 7 *** 14.9 (14.7, 15.0) 46 (42, 48) 6,335 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Arkansas 6 *** 21.3 (20.6, 22.0) 3 (1, 6) 759 rising rising trend 4.3 (3.4, 5.2)
Arizona 6 *** 16.1 (15.7, 16.5) 33 (29, 41) 1,336 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Alaska 6 *** 18.8 (17.3, 20.4) 13 (4, 31) 134 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.4)
Alabama 6 *** 18.2 (17.7, 18.7) 17 (13, 24) 1,072 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.6, 2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2022 1:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top