Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Brain & ONS (All Stages^), 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 6.5 (6.5, 6.5) 22,497 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Hawaii 7,8 *** 4.2 (3.7, 4.6) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 4.4 (4.1, 4.7) 174 stable stable trend -3.2 (-13.0, 7.9)
New Mexico 7,8 *** 5.3 (4.9, 5.7) 122 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 5.4 (4.6, 6.3) 35 stable stable trend -12.2 (-32.9, 14.9)
California 7,8 *** 5.9 (5.8, 6.0) 2,376 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Louisiana 7,8 *** 6.0 (5.7, 6.4) 299 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 6.1 (5.7, 6.5) 195 stable stable trend -3.2 (-11.3, 5.8)
Virginia 6,10 *** 6.1 (5.9, 6.3) 543 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.6, 4.9)
Arizona 6,10 *** 6.1 (5.9, 6.4) 457 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.8, -0.3)
Nevada 6,10 *** 6.2 (5.8, 6.6) 190 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 6.9)
Georgia 7,8 *** 6.2 (6.0, 6.4) 636 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Delaware 6,10 *** 6.2 (5.6, 7.0) 67 stable stable trend 0.1 (-11.1, 12.6)
Maryland 6,10 *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.5) 399 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.3, 2.0)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.6) 344 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.2, 5.7)
Illinois 6,10 *** 6.3 (6.1, 6.5) 873 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.5)
Texas 6,10 *** 6.3 (6.2, 6.5) 1,687 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Massachusetts 7,8 *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.6) 475 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Colorado 6,10 *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.7) 353 stable stable trend -0.2 (-7.6, 7.9)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.7) 461 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 6.4 (5.8, 7.1) 78 stable stable trend 1.6 (-14.8, 21.2)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 6.4 (5.6, 7.3) 51 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.3)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 6.4 (6.2, 6.6) 697 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.5)
Florida 6,10 *** 6.4 (6.3, 6.6) 1,532 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
Vermont 6,10 *** 6.5 (5.6, 7.4) 47 stable stable trend -1.9 (-20.6, 21.1)
Alaska 6,10 *** 6.5 (5.6, 7.5) 46 stable stable trend 8.6 (-9.7, 30.6)
Michigan 5,10 *** 6.5 # (6.3, 6.7) 721 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Alabama 6,10 *** 6.5 (6.2, 6.8) 351 stable stable trend -3.9 (-10.6, 3.4)
New York 7,8 *** 6.6 (6.4, 6.8) 1,422 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Indiana 6,10 *** 6.6 (6.3, 6.9) 468 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.6)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 6.6 (6.3, 7.0) 278 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 1.4)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 6.7 (5.8, 7.7) 42 stable stable trend 1.9 (-12.6, 18.8)
Utah 7,8 *** 6.7 (6.3, 7.2) 179 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Missouri 6,10 *** 6.8 (6.5, 7.1) 455 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.1)
Kansas 6,10 *** 6.8 (6.4, 7.2) 212 stable stable trend -0.3 (-7.9, 7.9)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 6.8 (6.3, 7.4) 138 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.8)
Connecticut 7,8 *** 6.9 (6.5, 7.2) 278 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 6.9 (6.5, 7.3) 228 stable stable trend -2.5 (-12.1, 8.1)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 6.9 (6.2, 7.7) 65 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.2, 4.4)
New Jersey 7,8 *** 6.9 (6.7, 7.2) 679 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.9, -2.2)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) 453 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.6, 5.1)
Ohio 6,10 *** 7.1 (6.8, 7.3) 913 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.9, 5.4)
Iowa 7,8 *** 7.1 (6.7, 7.5) 248 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 7.2 (7.0, 7.4) 1,057 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.4)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 7.2 (6.6, 7.9) 110 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.9, 7.4)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 7.2 (6.7, 7.8) 154 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 7.3 (7.0, 7.6) 429 stable stable trend -0.8 (-7.5, 6.5)
Washington 5,10 *** 7.3 (7.0, 7.6) 554 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.9, 6.3)
Oregon 6,10 *** 7.4 (7.0, 7.7) 328 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.1, -0.4)
Idaho 7,8 *** 7.4 (6.8, 8.0) 128 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Montana 6,10 *** 7.5 (6.8, 8.3) 89 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 2.2)
Kentucky 7,8 *** 7.5 (7.2, 7.9) 363 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.5)
Maine 6,10 *** 7.7 (7.1, 8.4) 124 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.8, 11.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/27/2020 10:05 pm.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission and SEER November 2018 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2018 data submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2018 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2018 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top