Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 73,915 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Alabama 2 14.2 (13.7, 14.6) 50 (47, 51) 877 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -1.1)
Alaska 2 18.3 (16.8, 19.8) 28 (6, 43) 133 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Arizona 2 15.2 (14.9, 15.6) 47 (44, 48) 1,390 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Arkansas 2 17.8 (17.2, 18.4) 32 (21, 40) 667 stable stable trend -3.1 (-5.9, 0.0)
California 7 18.1 (18.0, 18.3) 30 (24, 34) 8,038 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Colorado 2 16.3 (15.8, 16.8) 41 (39, 46) 1,041 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.8)
Connecticut 7 21.0 (20.4, 21.6) 4 (2, 8) 976 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 0.1)
Delaware 2 17.5 (16.5, 18.6) 35 (14, 44) 232 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.3, -1.6)
District of Columbia 2 15.5 (14.2, 16.9) 46 (33, 51) 105 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Florida 2 21.6 (21.4, 21.8) 2 (2, 4) 6,599 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.8)
Georgia 7 17.3 (16.9, 17.6) 39 (31, 41) 2,020 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.0)
Hawaii 7 14.7 (14.0, 15.6) 48 (44, 51) 288 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.3, -0.5)
Idaho 7 18.7 (17.8, 19.5) 21 (8, 37) 406 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Illinois 7 18.8 (18.4, 19.1) 20 (11, 29) 2,867 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.4)
Indiana 2 18.3 (17.8, 18.7) 29 (15, 35) 1,468 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -1.8)
Iowa 7 21.6 (20.9, 22.3) 3 (1, 6) 864 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.1)
Kansas 2 18.7 (18.1, 19.4) 18 (9, 33) 652 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Kentucky 7 19.6 (19.1, 20.1) 9 (7, 19) 1,079 falling falling trend -0.6 (-2.4, -0.2)
Louisiana 7 18.7 (18.2, 19.3) 19 (10, 32) 1,014 falling falling trend -0.7 (-2.3, -0.2)
Maine 2 19.4 (18.5, 20.3) 10 (6, 30) 390 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Maryland 2 17.3 (16.9, 17.7) 38 (30, 41) 1,268 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Massachusetts 2 18.5 (18.1, 18.9) 27 (13, 33) 1,625 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.2, -2.3)
Michigan 2 18.6 (18.2, 18.9) 24 (13, 30) 2,373 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.3, -0.5)
Minnesota 2 22.5 (22.0, 23.0) 1 (1, 2) 1,555 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Mississippi 2 16.0 (15.4, 16.7) 43 (40, 47) 567 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -1.7)
Missouri 2 18.9 (18.5, 19.4) 14 (9, 28) 1,455 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Montana 2 17.4 (16.4, 18.4) 36 (17, 45) 253 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.0, -0.9)
Nebraska 2 18.6 (17.8, 19.5) 22 (9, 37) 426 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Nevada 2 14.2 (13.6, 14.8) 49 (47, 51) 520 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
New Hampshire 2 20.1 (19.2, 21.1) 8 (3, 20) 379 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
New Jersey 7 20.9 (20.5, 21.2) 5 (3, 8) 2,375 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
New Mexico 7 14.1 (13.5, 14.8) 51 (47, 51) 382 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.2, -0.5)
New York 7 20.3 (20.0, 20.6) 7 (5, 10) 5,021 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
North Carolina 2 18.0 (17.7, 18.4) 31 (23, 36) 2,265 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
North Dakota 2 18.6 (17.3, 19.9) 23 (6, 40) 167 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Ohio 2 18.9 (18.6, 19.2) 15 (10, 26) 2,806 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.2)
Oklahoma 2 17.4 (16.8, 17.9) 37 (27, 41) 806 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Oregon 2 17.8 (17.3, 18.3) 33 (22, 40) 957 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Pennsylvania 2 18.8 (18.5, 19.1) 17 (10, 27) 3,253 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.5, -3.3)
Puerto Rico 2 13.4 (12.9, 13.9) N/A 617 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.7, -0.4)
Rhode Island 2 18.6 (17.6, 19.7) 25 (8, 40) 263 falling falling trend -2.7 (-8.4, -0.7)
South Carolina 2 15.7 (15.2, 16.1) 45 (41, 48) 1,017 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
South Dakota 2 18.9 (17.7, 20.1) 16 (5, 38) 207 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Tennessee 2 17.1 (16.7, 17.5) 40 (33, 42) 1,428 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -2.1)
Texas 7 17.6 (17.4, 17.9) 34 (30, 38) 5,225 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.4)
Utah 7 18.5 (17.8, 19.2) 26 (10, 36) 541 falling falling trend -0.7 (-2.3, -0.1)
Vermont 2 19.0 (17.7, 20.4) 12 (4, 39) 175 falling falling trend -2.4 (-8.3, -0.6)
Virginia 2 16.2 (15.8, 16.6) 42 (40, 46) 1,653 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.9)
Washington 1 18.9 (18.5, 19.4) 13 (9, 27) 1,699 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
West Virginia 2 19.2 (18.5, 20.1) 11 (7, 30) 485 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Wisconsin 2 20.7 (20.3, 21.2) 6 (3, 9) 1,546 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 0.2)
Wyoming 2 15.8 (14.5, 17.2) 44 (32, 51) 112 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/18/2026 9:35 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top