Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 28.7 (28.6, 28.8) N/A 55,346 falling falling trend -0.8 (-2.8, -0.2)
California 7 26.2 (25.9, 26.5) 30 (26, 32) 5,926 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.9, -0.3)
New York 7 42.2 (41.7, 42.7) 1 (1, 3) 5,014 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.4)
Florida 6 27.0 (26.6, 27.4) 24 (21, 29) 3,962 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Texas 7 21.6 (21.3, 22.0) 46 (43, 46) 3,343 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Pennsylvania 6 31.1 (30.5, 31.6) 11 (9, 14) 2,551 falling falling trend -1.0 (-3.2, -0.2)
Illinois 7 31.5 (31.0, 32.1) 10 (9, 13) 2,405 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.7)
New Jersey 7 40.9 (40.1, 41.7) 3 (1, 4) 2,255 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Ohio 6 26.9 (26.3, 27.4) 26 (22, 31) 1,999 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
North Carolina 6 30.0 (29.4, 30.6) 14 (11, 20) 1,985 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 0.9)
Michigan 6 29.9 (29.3, 30.6) 15 (11, 20) 1,881 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Georgia 7 27.5 (26.9, 28.1) 23 (20, 28) 1,725 falling falling trend -1.0 (-3.2, -0.2)
Virginia 6 30.4 (29.7, 31.1) 13 (10, 18) 1,582 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 2.6)
Massachusetts 7 36.2 (35.3, 37.0) 6 (4, 7) 1,534 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.2)
Washington 5 30.7 (29.9, 31.4) 12 (10, 18) 1,363 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.3)
Wisconsin 6 33.6 (32.7, 34.5) 8 (7, 9) 1,203 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.4)
Maryland 6 29.6 (28.8, 30.4) 16 (12, 22) 1,116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-5.0, -0.5)
Arizona 6 23.6 (23.0, 24.3) 39 (34, 43) 1,045 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.6, -0.3)
Missouri 6 26.5 (25.7, 27.3) 27 (22, 33) 1,028 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 0.4)
Tennessee 6 23.1 (22.4, 23.8) 41 (35, 45) 999 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.8)
South Carolina 6 29.2 (28.3, 30.0) 19 (13, 22) 985 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.4)
Minnesota 6 29.4 (28.6, 30.3) 17 (12, 22) 967 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.6, -0.1)
Connecticut 7 41.6 (40.3, 42.8) 2 (1, 4) 925 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.8, -0.4)
Colorado 6 26.9 (26.1, 27.8) 25 (21, 32) 872 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Kentucky 7 26.0 (25.1, 26.9) 31 (23, 35) 736 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.3)
Alabama 6 23.0 (22.2, 23.8) 42 (35, 45) 735 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Louisiana 7 25.1 (24.2, 25.9) 32 (28, 38) 724 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.3, 1.5)
Oregon 6 24.4 (23.5, 25.3) 35 (31, 41) 644 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.9, 5.9)
Iowa 7 29.3 (28.2, 30.5) 18 (11, 23) 552 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.3)
Arkansas 6 26.4 (25.3, 27.5) 28 (21, 35) 495 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.8)
Oklahoma 6 19.7 (18.9, 20.5) 47 (46, 48) 463 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Mississippi 6 24.0 (23.0, 25.1) 38 (31, 44) 451 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.6)
Kansas 6 24.7 (23.6, 25.8) 34 (28, 41) 423 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.8, 0.3)
Puerto Rico 6 18.6 (17.7, 19.5) N/A 390 stable stable trend -0.3 (-10.9, 11.6)
Utah 7 22.7 (21.6, 23.8) 43 (35, 46) 327 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.2)
Hawaii 7 35.7 (33.9, 37.6) 7 (4, 9) 315 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 0.8)
Nebraska 6 28.5 (27.0, 30.0) 21 (12, 29) 309 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
New Hampshire 6 33.3 (31.6, 35.2) 9 (6, 12) 298 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
West Virginia 6 22.1 (20.9, 23.4) 45 (37, 46) 270 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.3, 5.5)
Maine 6 26.3 (24.8, 28.0) 29 (20, 37) 253 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.1, -1.9)
Rhode Island 6 37.4 (35.3, 39.7) 4 (3, 7) 253 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 1.8)
Idaho 7 24.2 (22.8, 25.7) 36 (29, 44) 247 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
New Mexico 7 17.1 (16.1, 18.2) 49 (48, 49) 227 falling falling trend -6.1 (-12.5, -0.9)
Delaware 6 29.0 (27.1, 31.0) 20 (10, 29) 190 falling falling trend -5.5 (-11.4, -2.6)
Montana 6 24.1 (22.3, 25.9) 37 (26, 45) 162 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
South Dakota 6 28.0 (25.8, 30.3) 22 (11, 35) 140 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.4, 9.0)
District of Columbia 6 37.1 (34.2, 40.1) 5 (2, 9) 131 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -1.0)
North Dakota 6 24.9 (22.6, 27.4) 33 (21, 45) 98 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.9, 0.6)
Vermont 6 22.4 (20.3, 24.7) 44 (32, 47) 96 falling falling trend -5.8 (-10.5, -3.9)
Alaska 6 23.1 (20.9, 25.5) 40 (28, 47) 88 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Wyoming 6 17.6 (15.5, 19.9) 48 (47, 49) 58 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 5:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana, Nevada

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top