Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Childhood (Ages <20, All Sites) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes

Sorted by Recentaapc
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.4 (18.2, 18.5) N/A 14,902 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.9)
Vermont 6 20.9 (17.6, 24.6) 3 (1, 46) 29 stable stable trend 3.5 (-8.9, 15.9)
Utah 7 21.4 (20.1, 22.6) 2 (1, 13) 222 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.2)
District of Columbia 6 17.9 (15.0, 21.3) 32 (1, 50) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.3)
Kentucky 7 20.4 (19.2, 21.6) 5 (1, 24) 231 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.7)
Louisiana 7 17.0 (16.0, 18.1) 37 (22, 48) 208 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.8)
Maine 6 23.0 (20.5, 25.6) 1 (1, 13) 66 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.9)
Arizona 6 18.8 (17.9, 19.7) 21 (6, 34) 337 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Rhode Island 6 19.1 (16.7, 21.7) 14 (1, 47) 47 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Arkansas 6 16.8 (15.5, 18.1) 38 (20, 50) 132 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Florida 6 19.9 (19.3, 20.4) 7 (3, 19) 944 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.3)
Minnesota 6 19.5 (18.5, 20.6) 11 (3, 29) 285 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.6)
Nebraska 6 19.6 (17.9, 21.3) 10 (1, 37) 105 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
South Dakota 6 16.4 (14.2, 18.9) 42 (8, 50) 40 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.7)
Wyoming 6 18.0 (15.0, 21.3) 27 (1, 50) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Mississippi 6 14.7 (13.6, 16.0) 50 (39, 50) 117 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Ohio 6 18.8 (18.1, 19.5) 22 (8, 32) 552 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Tennessee 6 17.5 (16.6, 18.4) 35 (17, 44) 299 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
West Virginia 6 19.7 (17.8, 21.7) 8 (1, 41) 81 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Iowa 7 17.9 (16.7, 19.3) 31 (8, 46) 150 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Maryland 6 16.7 (15.8, 17.6) 39 (26, 49) 255 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
South Carolina 6 15.9 (14.9, 16.9) 47 (33, 50) 198 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Washington 5 19.4 (18.5, 20.3) 13 (3, 29) 359 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Oklahoma 6 17.6 (16.5, 18.8) 34 (13, 45) 188 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Colorado 6 18.4 (17.4, 19.5) 24 (8, 38) 261 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
New Jersey 7 19.6 (18.8, 20.5) 9 (3, 25) 446 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Wisconsin 6 18.3 (17.3, 19.3) 25 (8, 40) 265 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.1)
Delaware 6 19.5 (17.1, 22.2) 12 (1, 46) 46 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Hawaii 7 16.0 (14.2, 18.0) 46 (16, 50) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Montana 6 19.0 (16.7, 21.5) 19 (1, 48) 49 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Oregon 6 19.0 (17.8, 20.3) 18 (3, 36) 184 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Pennsylvania 6 19.0 (18.4, 19.7) 15 (6, 29) 582 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.7)
Virginia 6 16.1 (15.3, 16.8) 44 (34, 50) 342 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
New Hampshire 6 20.2 (18.0, 22.7) 6 (1, 38) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Alaska 6 17.9 (15.4, 20.8) 29 (2, 50) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Massachusetts 7 18.7 (17.7, 19.6) 23 (6, 36) 299 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.1, 0.6)
New Mexico 7 15.6 (14.2, 17.2) 48 (29, 50) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 0.6)
Idaho 7 16.6 (15.1, 18.3) 40 (15, 50) 85 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
New York 7 20.4 (19.8, 21.0) 4 (2, 13) 971 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 0.8)
Connecticut 7 18.8 (17.6, 20.2) 20 (4, 39) 163 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.5, 0.4)
North Dakota 6 16.0 (13.7, 18.7) 45 (9, 50) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Texas 7 19.0 (18.6, 19.5) 16 (8, 26) 1,566 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 0.2)
Georgia 7 18.0 (17.3, 18.7) 26 (16, 38) 510 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.7, 0.9)
California 7 17.9 (17.6, 18.3) 30 (21, 36) 1,792 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 0.0)
Kansas 6 18.0 (16.7, 19.3) 28 (7, 45) 143 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.9, -0.1)
Illinois 7 19.0 (18.4, 19.7) 17 (6, 31) 613 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Puerto Rico 6 17.8 (16.3, 19.4) N/A 108 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.1, 3.3)
Michigan 6 16.5 (15.8, 17.3) 41 (31, 48) 408 falling falling trend -2.3 (-8.2, -0.7)
Missouri 6 16.4 (15.5, 17.3) 43 (29, 49) 254 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.3, 0.3)
North Carolina 6 17.3 (16.6, 18.1) 36 (23, 44) 449 stable stable trend -2.5 (-10.8, 1.8)
Nevada 6 17.8 (16.5, 19.2) 33 (8, 47) 134 stable stable trend -7.0 (-17.4, 2.1)
Alabama 6 15.5 (14.6, 16.6) 49 (36, 50) 195 falling falling trend -10.8 (-16.5, -7.1)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 11:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top