Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Childhood (Ages <20, All Sites) (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 19.1 (19.0, 19.3) N/A 15,720 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Delaware 6 *** 22.3 (19.7, 25.2) 1 (1, 38) 51 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 2.9)
Maine 6 *** 22.1 (19.7, 24.7) 2 (1, 34) 64 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
New York 7 *** 21.6 (21.0, 22.2) 3 (1, 10) 1,013 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.1, 1.6)
New Hampshire 6 *** 21.2 (18.9, 23.6) 4 (1, 41) 64 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Kentucky 7 *** 21.0 (19.8, 22.2) 5 (1, 24) 237 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.8, 2.0)
District of Columbia 6 *** 20.9 (17.7, 24.6) 6 (1, 49) 31 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.4, 4.9)
New Jersey 7 *** 20.9 (20.0, 21.7) 7 (1, 19) 458 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.2)
Rhode Island 6 *** 20.7 (18.3, 23.5) 8 (1, 45) 51 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.9)
Florida 6 *** 20.7 (20.1, 21.3) 9 (2, 18) 958 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Washington 5 *** 20.3 (19.3, 21.2) 10 (2, 29) 366 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Utah 7 *** 20.1 (18.9, 21.4) 11 (2, 36) 202 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.7, 1.3)
Iowa 7 *** 20.1 (18.8, 21.5) 12 (2, 38) 166 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
Minnesota 6 *** 20.0 (19.0, 21.1) 13 (3, 33) 287 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 1.9)
Oregon 6 *** 19.9 (18.6, 21.2) 14 (2, 37) 192 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Vermont 6 *** 19.8 (16.7, 23.4) 15 (1, 51) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Nevada 6 *** 19.7 (18.1, 21.4) 16 (2, 44) 116
*
*
Illinois 6 *** 19.7 (19.0, 20.4) 17 (7, 31) 644 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.1, 1.6)
Nebraska 6 *** 19.7 (18.0, 21.5) 18 (1, 43) 104 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Alabama 6 *** 19.5 (18.4, 20.7) 19 (4, 40) 240 stable stable trend -4.3 (-14.8, 7.4)
Pennsylvania 6 *** 19.5 (18.8, 20.2) 20 (8, 34) 593 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Wisconsin 6 *** 19.4 (18.4, 20.4) 21 (6, 40) 281 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Kansas 6 *** 19.3 (18.0, 20.7) 22 (4, 43) 154 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Massachusetts 7 *** 19.2 (18.3, 20.2) 23 (7, 40) 308 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.3)
Montana 6 *** 19.2 (16.9, 21.8) 24 (1, 49) 49 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Texas 6 *** 19.2 (18.8, 19.6) 25 (13, 33) 1,549 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
California 7 *** 19.1 (18.7, 19.5) 26 (14, 33) 1,936 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.2)
West Virginia 6 *** 18.9 (17.1, 20.9) 27 (3, 49) 79 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Ohio 6 *** 18.8 (18.1, 19.5) 28 (14, 41) 552 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.4)
Connecticut 7 *** 18.7 (17.5, 20.1) 29 (7, 46) 163 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.1)
Georgia 7 *** 18.7 (18.0, 19.4) 30 (14, 41) 521 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.1, 1.7)
Arizona 6 *** 18.7 (17.8, 19.6) 31 (12, 43) 340 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.7)
Colorado 6 *** 18.5 (17.5, 19.6) 32 (12, 45) 259 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Puerto Rico 6 *** 18.5 (17.2, 19.9) N/A 146 stable stable trend -0.7 (-9.9, 9.4)
North Carolina 6 *** 18.4 (17.6, 19.1) 33 (17, 43) 474 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
Michigan 5 *** 18.2 (17.5, 19.0) 34 (19, 45) 453 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Missouri 6 *** 18.1 (17.2, 19.1) 35 (17, 46) 280 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 1.9)
Indiana 6 *** 18.1 (17.2, 19.0) 36 (18, 46) 319 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Wyoming 6 *** 18.0 (15.1, 21.2) 37 (2, 51) 27 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.4)
Tennessee 6 *** 17.9 (17.0, 18.8) 38 (20, 47) 299 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Arkansas 6 *** 17.9 (16.6, 19.2) 39 (13, 50) 140 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.3)
Louisiana 7 *** 17.8 (16.7, 18.9) 40 (18, 49) 218 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.8, 2.2)
Idaho 7 *** 17.7 (16.1, 19.5) 41 (10, 51) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Hawaii 7 *** 17.6 (15.7, 19.7) 42 (7, 51) 59 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Maryland 6 *** 17.3 (16.4, 18.3) 43 (27, 50) 261 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 1.9)
Oklahoma 6 *** 17.0 (15.9, 18.1) 44 (28, 51) 181 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
South Carolina 6 *** 16.8 (15.8, 17.8) 45 (32, 51) 206 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.7)
South Dakota 6 *** 16.6 (14.4, 19.1) 46 (10, 51) 40 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Virginia 6 *** 16.5 (15.7, 17.3) 47 (39, 51) 345 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Alaska 6 *** 16.3 (13.9, 19.0) 48 (12, 51) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
New Mexico 7 *** 16.2 (14.7, 17.8) 49 (30, 51) 89 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.2)
Mississippi 6 *** 15.9 (14.7, 17.2) 50 (37, 51) 128
*
*
North Dakota 6 *** 15.5 (13.1, 18.1) 51 (18, 51) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/28/2022 12:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top