Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 448.4 (448.1, 448.7) 1,540,559 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
California 3,9 417.1 (416.2, 418.1) 158,259 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.7, -2.3)
Florida 6,10 428.5 (427.4, 429.7) 106,898 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
New York 6,10 482.5 (481.1, 483.8) 105,987 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Texas 6,10 410.2 (409.1, 411.4) 98,754 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Pennsylvania 6,10 487.2 (485.6, 488.8) 76,414 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Illinois 6,10 468.3 (466.7, 470.0) 64,740 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Ohio 6,10 454.9 (453.3, 456.5) 61,352 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.3)
Michigan 5,10 463.1 # (461.3, 464.9) 53,154 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.3)
North Carolina 6,10 459.4 (457.6, 461.3) 48,990 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
New Jersey 3,8 484.0 (482.1, 486.0) 48,523 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.5, -1.3)
Georgia 3,9 455.8 (453.8, 457.7) 44,019 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Virginia 6,10 424.2 (422.3, 426.2) 36,890 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
Massachusetts 6,10 473.6 (471.3, 475.8) 36,050 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.2)
Washington 5,10 461.7 (459.5, 464.0) 33,943 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Tennessee 6,10 463.4 (461.2, 465.7) 33,669 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Indiana 6,10 449.0 (446.8, 451.3) 32,080 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Missouri 6,10 452.2 (449.9, 454.5) 31,282 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Wisconsin 6,10 457.9 (455.6, 460.3) 30,010 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Maryland 6,10 449.2 (446.8, 451.6) 28,460 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Arizona 6,10 386.0 (384.0, 388.1) 27,868 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Minnesota 6,10 458.5 (456.1, 461.0) 26,980 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Kentucky 3,9 511.2 (508.3, 514.0) 25,205 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Alabama 6,10 454.6 (452.1, 457.2) 25,045 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
South Carolina 6,10 452.7 (450.1, 455.3) 24,331 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Louisiana 3,9 482.3 (479.5, 485.1) 23,570 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Colorado 6,10 412.8 (410.2, 415.3) 21,350 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.4, -2.2)
Connecticut 3,8 483.2 (480.2, 486.2) 20,361 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Oregon 6,10 440.4 (437.6, 443.2) 19,917 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Oklahoma 6,10 445.8 (443.0, 448.8) 18,671 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Iowa 3,8 469.1 (465.9, 472.3) 16,992 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Arkansas 6,10 445.3 (442.1, 448.5) 15,138 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Mississippi 6,10 467.0 (463.6, 470.4) 15,138 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Kansas 6,10 460.4 (456.9, 463.8) 14,423 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
West Virginia 6,10 471.0 (467.0, 475.0) 11,216 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Utah 3,8 406.6 (402.9, 410.4) 9,379 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Nebraska 6,10 439.5 (435.4, 443.7) 8,941 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
New Mexico 3,8 379.1 (375.5, 382.7) 8,757 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Maine 6,10 473.9 (469.2, 478.6) 8,222 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
New Hampshire 6,10 487.1 (482.1, 492.1) 7,659 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Idaho 6,10 439.0 (434.5, 443.6) 7,313 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Hawaii 3,8 416.9 (412.3, 421.5) 6,704 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Rhode Island 6,10 478.9 (473.4, 484.5) 5,957 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 2.8)
Montana 6,10 448.3 (442.9, 453.8) 5,489 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Delaware 6,10 498.1 (492.1, 504.2) 5,342 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
South Dakota 6,10 444.2 (438.1, 450.4) 4,203 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.4)
Vermont 6,10 460.8 (453.9, 467.8) 3,573 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.2)
North Dakota 6,10 447.8 (441.1, 454.7) 3,520 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.9)
District of Columbia 6,10 480.0 (472.1, 488.0) 2,911 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.9, 3.6)
Alaska 6,10 425.8 (417.9, 433.8) 2,634 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -1.0)
Wyoming 6,10 409.1 (401.9, 416.5) 2,551 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.0, 0.9)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/24/2016 10:42 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top