Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 443.6 (443.3, 443.9) 1,556,536 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 510.8 (508.0, 513.7) 25,610 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.3)
Delaware 6,10 *** 495.3 (489.3, 501.3) 5,452 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 484.5 (482.9, 486.1) 76,894 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 480.9 (476.0, 485.9) 7,735 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 478.7 (475.9, 481.5) 23,840 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 478.4 (476.5, 480.3) 48,693 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
New York 6,10 *** 477.8 (476.5, 479.1) 106,489 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 477.0 (469.2, 484.9) 2,949 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.2, 0.1)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 475.8 (472.8, 478.8) 20,298 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 474.0 (468.5, 479.6) 5,965 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.4)
Maine 6,10 *** 470.1 (465.4, 474.8) 8,309 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 468.8 (464.9, 472.8) 11,275 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Iowa 3,8 *** 466.3 (463.1, 469.5) 17,092 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 465.1 (461.8, 468.5) 15,351 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Illinois 6,10 *** 463.5 (461.9, 465.1) 65,111 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 462.7 (460.5, 464.8) 35,831 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 458.7 (456.4, 461.1) 30,620 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Kansas 6,10 *** 458.6 (455.2, 462.0) 14,568 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 457.7 (455.5, 460.0) 33,972 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 457.0 (455.2, 458.8) 50,022 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 456.5 (454.0, 459.0) 27,431 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Michigan 5,10 *** 455.7 # (453.9, 457.4) 53,133 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.7)
Washington 5,10 *** 454.4 (452.2, 456.6) 34,291 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Vermont 6,10 *** 454.4 (447.5, 461.3) 3,586 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Georgia 3,8 *** 452.5 (450.6, 454.4) 44,972 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1)
Ohio 6,10 *** 451.3 (449.7, 452.9) 61,732 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Missouri 6,10 *** 450.5 (448.3, 452.8) 31,677 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 449.9 (447.3, 452.5) 24,837 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 448.8 (442.7, 455.0) 4,330 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.3)
Alabama 6,10 *** 448.0 (445.5, 450.5) 25,117 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Maryland 6,10 *** 447.3 (445.0, 449.7) 28,960 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 447.2 (444.0, 450.4) 15,424 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.5)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 446.9 (442.8, 451.1) 9,248 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 445.4 (438.7, 452.1) 3,556 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.4)
Indiana 6,10 *** 445.2 (443.0, 447.4) 32,312 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 442.8 (440.0, 445.7) 18,840 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Montana 6,10 *** 441.6 (436.2, 447.0) 5,520 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Oregon 6,10 *** 433.0 (430.2, 435.7) 20,046 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.6)
Idaho 6,10 *** 431.5 (427.0, 436.0) 7,389 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Florida 6,10 *** 423.0 (421.8, 424.1) 108,179 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Alaska 6,10 *** 419.8 (412.1, 427.6) 2,669 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.5)
Virginia 6,10 *** 418.1 (416.2, 420.0) 37,229 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 411.9 (407.4, 416.4) 6,751 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
California 3,8 *** 409.5 (408.5, 410.4) 159,459 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Texas 6,10 *** 405.8 (404.6, 406.9) 100,671 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
Colorado 6,10 *** 405.1 (402.6, 407.6) 21,606 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 405.0 (397.8, 412.3) 2,581 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.6, 1.2)
Utah 3,8 *** 403.6 (399.9, 407.3) 9,590 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Arizona 6,10 *** 384.2 (382.2, 386.3) 28,575 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 373.8 (370.2, 377.4) 8,812 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 350.3 (347.8, 352.9) 15,102 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/16/2017 10:03 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top