Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 102.8 (102.6, 103.0) 204,831 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 118.2 (116.4, 120.0) 3,318 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.1)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 116.7 (115.7, 117.8) 9,095 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 116.4 (113.5, 119.3) 1,296 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 3.8)
New York 6,10 *** 114.9 (114.1, 115.8) 14,509 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 114.0 (110.8, 117.4) 960 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.5)
Delaware 6,10 *** 114.0 (110.1, 118.1) 647 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.4)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 113.1 (109.4, 116.8) 743 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Vermont 6,10 *** 112.0 (107.2, 117.0) 423 stable stable trend -0.0 (-4.4, 4.6)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 111.1 (109.1, 113.0) 2,592 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Maine 6,10 *** 111.0 (107.7, 114.3) 894 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.7)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 110.1 (105.5, 114.7) 474 falling falling trend -6.8 (-12.5, -0.8)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 110.0 (108.6, 111.4) 4,737 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 109.4 (108.3, 110.6) 6,501 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.6)
Ohio 6,10 *** 108.8 (107.7, 109.9) 7,688 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.6)
Iowa 3,8 *** 108.3 (106.1, 110.4) 2,013 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 108.1 (106.7, 109.6) 4,424 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 108.0 (106.4, 109.5) 3,638 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.7)
Kansas 6,10 *** 107.7 (105.5, 109.9) 1,851 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 106.6 (103.5, 109.7) 934 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 1.4)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 106.5 (105.0, 108.0) 3,762 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 106.0 (104.9, 107.2) 6,680 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 105.9 (104.2, 107.6) 3,059 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Michigan 5,10 *** 104.9 # (103.7, 106.0) 6,364 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 104.7 (100.6, 108.9) 503 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.2, 6.3)
Indiana 6,10 *** 104.5 (103.1, 105.9) 4,235 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 104.4 (101.7, 107.1) 1,162 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.7)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 104.0 (101.9, 106.1) 1,884 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Illinois 6,10 *** 103.7 (102.7, 104.7) 8,505 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Missouri 6,10 *** 103.5 (102.0, 105.0) 3,792 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Maryland 6,10 *** 102.9 (101.5, 104.4) 3,983 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 1.9)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 102.9 (100.8, 105.1) 1,834 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.0, 6.6)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 102.9 (101.2, 104.5) 3,018 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
Alabama 6,10 *** 102.5 (100.8, 104.1) 3,046 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 4.7)
Washington 5,10 *** 102.2 (100.9, 103.6) 4,538 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 101.3 (96.9, 105.8) 423 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 4.3)
Florida 6,10 *** 101.2 (100.4, 102.1) 12,122 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Georgia 3,8 *** 101.1 (100.0, 102.2) 6,809 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.6)
Oregon 6,10 *** 100.7 (98.9, 102.5) 2,440 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 100.6 (98.8, 102.5) 2,315 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 4.9)
Utah 3,8 *** 100.4 (98.3, 102.5) 1,819 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 6.0)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 100.3 (98.5, 102.2) 2,206 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.8, 7.2)
Montana 6,10 *** 99.3 (95.7, 103.1) 574 stable stable trend -0.0 (-5.1, 5.3)
Idaho 6,10 *** 98.1 (95.3, 101.0) 943 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.6, 4.8)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 95.8 (91.2, 100.6) 328 stable stable trend 0.4 (-6.0, 7.1)
Virginia 6,10 *** 94.7 (93.6, 95.9) 5,091 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 2.8)
Colorado 6,10 *** 93.9 (92.5, 95.4) 3,212 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Texas 6,10 *** 93.1 (92.5, 93.8) 15,953 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Alaska 6,10 *** 91.8 (88.0, 95.8) 431 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.1)
California 3,8 *** 91.0 (90.4, 91.5) 23,214 rising rising trend 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)
Arizona 6,10 *** 90.4 (89.1, 91.8) 3,637 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 89.8 (87.4, 92.2) 1,126 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Nevada 6 ***
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/18/2019 3:11 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top