Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 40.6 (40.5, 40.7) 139,095 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
California 3,9 38.3 (38.0, 38.6) 14,458 falling falling trend -4.4 (-4.9, -3.9)
Florida 6,10 37.9 (37.5, 38.2) 9,599 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.5)
Texas 6,10 39.2 (38.9, 39.6) 9,348 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.0)
New York 6,10 41.5 (41.1, 41.9) 9,148 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.7)
Pennsylvania 6,10 44.3 (43.8, 44.8) 7,063 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.7)
Illinois 6,10 45.3 (44.8, 45.9) 6,264 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.5)
Ohio 6,10 41.8 (41.3, 42.3) 5,654 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.8, 0.6)
Michigan 5,10 39.5 # (39.0, 40.1) 4,529 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.1)
New Jersey 3,8 43.5 (42.9, 44.1) 4,384 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.4, -3.6)
North Carolina 6,10 38.4 (37.8, 38.9) 4,047 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -2.0)
Georgia 3,9 41.7 (41.1, 42.3) 3,981 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Virginia 6,10 37.5 (36.9, 38.0) 3,216 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.7, -0.3)
Indiana 6,10 44.0 (43.3, 44.7) 3,126 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Missouri 6,10 43.2 (42.5, 43.9) 2,982 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Massachusetts 6,10 38.9 (38.2, 39.5) 2,980 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.9)
Tennessee 6,10 41.4 (40.8, 42.1) 2,973 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.6, -0.8)
Washington 5,10 37.6 (36.9, 38.2) 2,727 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.3, -1.2)
Wisconsin 6,10 39.1 (38.4, 39.8) 2,570 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.3)
Arizona 6,10 34.7 (34.1, 35.4) 2,497 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.5)
Kentucky 3,9 50.8 (49.9, 51.7) 2,487 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.5)
Alabama 6,10 44.1 (43.3, 44.9) 2,416 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.5)
Louisiana 3,9 48.6 (47.7, 49.5) 2,364 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.7)
Maryland 6,10 37.6 (36.9, 38.3) 2,358 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Minnesota 6,10 39.6 (38.9, 40.4) 2,327 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
South Carolina 6,10 39.4 (38.6, 40.1) 2,096 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.2)
Oklahoma 6,10 43.5 (42.6, 44.4) 1,813 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.7)
Colorado 6,10 34.6 (33.8, 35.3) 1,735 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Connecticut 3,8 40.2 (39.3, 41.1) 1,715 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.4, -3.3)
Iowa 3,8 45.5 (44.5, 46.5) 1,679 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.3, -2.7)
Oregon 6,10 37.1 (36.2, 37.9) 1,658 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.1)
Mississippi 6,10 49.8 (48.7, 50.9) 1,607 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.2)
Arkansas 6,10 43.0 (42.0, 44.0) 1,457 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Kansas 6,10 41.8 (40.8, 42.9) 1,315 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.3, -0.9)
West Virginia 6,10 47.0 (45.7, 48.2) 1,122 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.5)
Nebraska 6,10 43.7 (42.4, 45.0) 897 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.5)
New Mexico 3,8 34.7 (33.6, 35.8) 801 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.2)
Hawaii 3,8 44.3 (42.8, 45.8) 722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Utah 3,8 31.9 (30.9, 33.0) 717 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.0)
Maine 6,10 39.9 (38.6, 41.3) 690 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.5, -0.3)
Idaho 6,10 37.1 (35.7, 38.4) 610 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.0, 2.5)
New Hampshire 6,10 37.9 (36.5, 39.3) 591 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.8, 7.4)
Montana 6,10 39.9 (38.3, 41.6) 490 stable stable trend -4.0 (-9.5, 2.0)
Rhode Island 6,10 38.6 (37.0, 40.2) 489 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.5, -3.1)
South Dakota 6,10 45.2 (43.2, 47.1) 437 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.4, -1.4)
Delaware 6,10 38.2 (36.6, 39.9) 408 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.0, -1.4)
North Dakota 6,10 47.1 (44.9, 49.3) 374 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.1, 5.7)
Vermont 6,10 37.4 (35.4, 39.4) 290 stable stable trend -3.8 (-11.7, 4.7)
Alaska 6,10 44.3 (41.8, 47.0) 268 stable stable trend -5.2 (-12.3, 2.4)
District of Columbia 6,10 44.0 (41.6, 46.5) 262 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.8, -1.4)
Wyoming 6,10 37.6 (35.4, 39.9) 232 stable stable trend -5.5 (-12.1, 1.5)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/26/2016 9:14 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top