Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
California 3,9 33.6 (33.3, 34.0) 6,943 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.5, -3.3)
Florida 6,10 33.1 (32.7, 33.6) 4,590 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.5)
New York 6,10 36.6 (36.1, 37.1) 4,573 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.2, -1.3)
Texas 6,10 32.8 (32.4, 33.3) 4,234 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Pennsylvania 6,10 38.6 (38.0, 39.2) 3,475 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
Illinois 6,10 38.9 (38.3, 39.6) 3,014 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Ohio 6,10 36.2 (35.5, 36.8) 2,729 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.4)
New Jersey 3,8 38.8 (38.0, 39.5) 2,220 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Michigan 5,10 34.9 # (34.2, 35.5) 2,202 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.0, -1.9)
North Carolina 6,10 33.4 (32.7, 34.1) 1,948 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.2, -0.9)
Georgia 3,9 36.2 (35.5, 37.0) 1,896 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.3)
Virginia 6,10 33.5 (32.8, 34.3) 1,577 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.0, -0.3)
Indiana 6,10 39.4 (38.5, 40.3) 1,548 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.5)
Massachusetts 6,10 35.0 (34.2, 35.8) 1,515 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -1.5)
Tennessee 6,10 36.6 (35.7, 37.4) 1,443 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.4)
Missouri 6,10 37.3 (36.4, 38.2) 1,425 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.3, 0.0)
Washington 5,10 34.0 (33.2, 34.9) 1,319 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.1, -0.1)
Wisconsin 6,10 34.3 (33.4, 35.1) 1,241 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.4, -1.2)
Maryland 6,10 33.8 (33.0, 34.7) 1,184 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.4, 1.7)
Arizona 6,10 30.5 (29.7, 31.3) 1,174 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.0, -3.4)
Kentucky 3,9 43.7 (42.6, 44.8) 1,173 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.2, 1.5)
Minnesota 6,10 35.2 (34.3, 36.2) 1,133 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.6, 1.6)
Alabama 6,10 37.3 (36.3, 38.3) 1,127 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.9, 4.8)
Louisiana 3,9 41.8 (40.7, 43.0) 1,107 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.8, 1.5)
South Carolina 6,10 34.4 (33.5, 35.4) 1,006 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.2)
Oklahoma 6,10 38.1 (37.0, 39.3) 865 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.8, 2.2)
Connecticut 3,8 35.1 (34.0, 36.2) 845 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.5, -3.2)
Colorado 6,10 31.0 (30.1, 32.0) 838 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Iowa 3,8 39.7 (38.4, 41.0) 821 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.4)
Oregon 6,10 32.5 (31.5, 33.6) 790 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.0, -1.9)
Mississippi 6,10 42.6 (41.2, 44.0) 759 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.7, -0.2)
Arkansas 6,10 37.0 (35.8, 38.3) 683 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Kansas 6,10 36.0 (34.7, 37.3) 620 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.8, 2.3)
West Virginia 6,10 40.8 (39.2, 42.4) 529 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 4.6)
Nebraska 6,10 38.9 (37.3, 40.6) 439 stable stable trend -4.8 (-10.1, 0.8)
New Mexico 3,8 29.8 (28.4, 31.2) 369 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.5)
Maine 6,10 35.6 (33.8, 37.4) 337 stable stable trend -5.0 (-10.5, 0.9)
Utah 3,8 28.2 (26.9, 29.6) 334 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.8)
Hawaii 3,8 36.4 (34.5, 38.3) 316 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
New Hampshire 6,10 34.7 (32.9, 36.6) 294 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.7, 4.7)
Idaho 6,10 32.2 (30.5, 34.0) 279 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.1, 8.7)
Rhode Island 6,10 35.3 (33.3, 37.3) 258 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.2, 2.1)
Montana 6,10 34.5 (32.4, 36.6) 222 stable stable trend -4.4 (-9.2, 0.6)
South Dakota 6,10 39.8 (37.4, 42.4) 212 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.4, 2.7)
Delaware 6,10 33.3 (31.2, 35.5) 196 stable stable trend -5.7 (-11.6, 0.5)
North Dakota 6,10 40.2 (37.5, 43.0) 175 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.0)
Vermont 6,10 33.4 (30.9, 36.0) 142 stable stable trend -2.6 (-11.5, 7.2)
District of Columbia 6,10 41.1 (38.1, 44.4) 138 stable stable trend -3.8 (-15.0, 8.8)
Alaska 6,10 40.4 (37.0, 43.9) 122 stable stable trend -1.4 (-14.0, 13.0)
Wyoming 6,10 31.6 (28.9, 34.6) 101 stable stable trend -9.9 (-19.8, 1.2)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/30/2016 6:17 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top