Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 34.8 (34.7, 34.9) 66,668 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Kentucky 3,8 No 42.4 (41.3, 43.6) 1,155 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Mississippi 6,10 No 41.8 (40.4, 43.2) 757 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.2)
Louisiana 3,8 No 41.4 (40.3, 42.5) 1,110 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
West Virginia 6,10 No 40.9 (39.3, 42.5) 533 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 5.0)
District of Columbia 6,10 No 40.3 (37.3, 43.5) 138 stable stable trend -3.4 (-14.4, 9.0)
Alaska 6,10 No 40.2 (37.0, 43.7) 124 stable stable trend -1.5 (-14.1, 13.0)
North Dakota 6,10 No 40.0 (37.3, 42.9) 174 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.3, 5.7)
Iowa 3,8 Yes 39.8 (38.6, 41.1) 823 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
South Dakota 6,10 Yes 38.8 (36.4, 41.4) 208 stable stable trend -3.5 (-10.2, 3.7)
Indiana 6,10 Yes 38.5 (37.6, 39.4) 1,533 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 1.0)
Nebraska 6,10 Yes 38.2 (36.6, 39.9) 434 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.7, -1.9)
Illinois 6,10 Yes 38.1 (37.5, 38.8) 2,990 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.0)
New Jersey 3,8 Yes 37.8 (37.1, 38.6) 2,189 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Pennsylvania 6,10 Yes 37.5 (36.9, 38.1) 3,393 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Arkansas 6,10 Yes 37.1 (35.9, 38.4) 691 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Alabama 6,10 Yes 36.9 (36.0, 37.9) 1,130 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 5.7)
Oklahoma 6,10 Yes 36.9 (35.8, 38.1) 847 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.4)
Missouri 6,10 Yes 36.6 (35.8, 37.5) 1,415 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.4)
Hawaii 3,8 Yes 36.5 (34.6, 38.4) 320 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Tennessee 6,10 Yes 36.4 (35.5, 37.3) 1,461 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.6)
Kansas 6,10 Yes 36.1 (34.8, 37.4) 626 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.3, 4.1)
Ohio 6,10 Yes 35.8 (35.2, 36.4) 2,725 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
New York 6,10 Yes 35.7 (35.3, 36.2) 4,503 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.9, 0.0)
Georgia 3,8 Yes 35.6 (34.9, 36.4) 1,916 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Rhode Island 6,10 Yes 34.7 (32.8, 36.8) 254 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.8, 0.5)
Minnesota 6,10 Yes 34.7 (33.8, 35.6) 1,132 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.5)
Puerto Rico 6,10 Yes 34.6 (33.6, 35.7) 838 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.2)
Maine 6,10 Yes 34.3 (32.6, 36.0) 328 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.5)
Connecticut 3,8 Yes 34.3 (33.2, 35.4) 832 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.9)
New Hampshire 6,10 Yes 34.2 (32.4, 36.0) 296 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.3, 5.6)
Montana 6,10 Yes 34.1 (32.1, 36.3) 223 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.0, 2.2)
Michigan 5,10 Yes 34.0 # (33.4, 34.7) 2,170 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
South Carolina 6,10 Yes 33.8 (32.8, 34.7) 1,010 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.0, -2.0)
Massachusetts 6,10 Yes 33.7 (32.9, 34.5) 1,468 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Wisconsin 6,10 Yes 33.6 (32.7, 34.5) 1,228 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.5)
Maryland 6,10 Yes 33.3 (32.4, 34.1) 1,184 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 2.0)
Virginia 6,10 Yes 33.1 (32.4, 33.9) 1,587 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.9, 3.1)
North Carolina 6,10 Yes 33.0 (32.3, 33.6) 1,968 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.3)
Vermont 6,10 Yes 33.0 (30.5, 35.6) 142 stable stable trend -0.6 (-9.3, 8.9)
Washington 5,10 Yes 32.9 (32.1, 33.7) 1,307 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Delaware 6,10 Yes 32.9 (30.8, 35.0) 197 stable stable trend -3.6 (-11.4, 5.0)
California 3,8 Yes 32.6 (32.3, 33.0) 6,892 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
Idaho 6,10 Yes 32.5 (30.8, 34.3) 287 stable stable trend 0.6 (-8.3, 10.2)
Florida 6,10 Yes 32.3 (31.9, 32.8) 4,565 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Texas 6,10 Yes 32.2 (31.8, 32.6) 4,275 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Oregon 6,10 Yes 31.2 (30.2, 32.3) 776 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.2, 0.5)
Colorado 6,10 Yes 30.8 (29.8, 31.7) 852 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Wyoming 6,10 Yes 30.5 (27.8, 33.4) 98 stable stable trend -8.4 (-19.7, 4.4)
Arizona 6,10 Yes 29.8 (29.1, 30.6) 1,182 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -0.3)
New Mexico 3,8 Yes 29.3 (27.9, 30.7) 368 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.7)
Utah 3,8 Yes 27.7 (26.4, 29.1) 337 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.8)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/23/2017 11:36 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top