Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Colon & Rectum, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 34.3 (34.2, 34.4) 66,763 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Kentucky 3,8 No 42.4 (41.3, 43.6) 1,166 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
West Virginia 6,10 No 41.6 (40.0, 43.3) 546 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.7, 5.1)
Mississippi 6,10 No 41.1 (39.8, 42.5) 756 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Louisiana 3,8 No 40.0 (38.9, 41.1) 1,089 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Iowa 3,8 Yes 39.3 (38.1, 40.6) 814 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
North Dakota 6,10 Yes 38.9 (36.2, 41.7) 171 stable stable trend -2.9 (-10.8, 5.6)
Alaska 6,10 Yes 38.6 (35.4, 41.9) 122 stable stable trend 2.1 (-7.9, 13.1)
Indiana 6,10 Yes 38.3 (37.4, 39.1) 1,541 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
Illinois 6,10 Yes 37.6 (37.0, 38.3) 2,976 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.1)
Arkansas 6,10 Yes 37.5 (36.3, 38.8) 706 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Nebraska 6,10 Yes 37.4 (35.8, 39.1) 429 stable stable trend -1.5 (-8.4, 6.0)
Alabama 6,10 Yes 37.1 (36.1, 38.0) 1,149 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.2, 5.8)
Pennsylvania 6,10 Yes 37.0 (36.4, 37.6) 3,350 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
New Jersey 3,8 Yes 37.0 (36.3, 37.7) 2,156 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Oklahoma 6,10 Yes 36.9 (35.8, 38.0) 855 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.4)
South Dakota 6,10 Yes 36.8 (34.5, 39.3) 200 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.0, 3.6)
District of Columbia 6,10 Yes 36.7 (33.8, 39.7) 127 stable stable trend -4.0 (-17.8, 12.1)
Ohio 6,10 Yes 36.4 (35.8, 37.1) 2,785 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Missouri 6,10 Yes 35.9 (35.1, 36.8) 1,403 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.7)
Georgia 3,8 Yes 35.9 (35.2, 36.6) 1,982 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Hawaii 3,8 Yes 35.7 (33.9, 37.6) 319 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Tennessee 6,10 Yes 35.6 (34.8, 36.5) 1,452 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.9)
Kansas 6,10 Yes 35.2 (33.9, 36.5) 615 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.9, 4.5)
Puerto Rico 6,10 Yes 35.1 (34.0, 36.2) 861 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
New York 6,10 Yes 35.0 (34.5, 35.4) 4,444 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.3)
Minnesota 6,10 Yes 34.2 (33.2, 35.1) 1,128 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Maine 6,10 Yes 33.9 (32.2, 35.6) 330 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
New Hampshire 6,10 Yes 33.9 (32.1, 35.7) 299 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.4, 0.7)
South Carolina 6,10 Yes 33.7 (32.8, 34.7) 1,031 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.6, 3.0)
Michigan 5,10 Yes 33.5 # (32.9, 34.2) 2,162 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.5)
Vermont 6,10 Yes 33.5 (31.0, 36.1) 145 stable stable trend -1.6 (-8.5, 5.8)
Connecticut 3,8 Yes 33.4 (32.3, 34.4) 813 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.9, -3.0)
Idaho 6,10 Yes 33.2 (31.5, 34.9) 301 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.0, 6.2)
Maryland 6,10 Yes 33.2 (32.3, 34.0) 1,203 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Wisconsin 6,10 Yes 33.1 (32.3, 34.0) 1,218 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.7)
Massachusetts 6,10 Yes 33.1 (32.4, 33.9) 1,457 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Montana 6,10 Yes 33.0 (31.0, 35.1) 217 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.9, 3.6)
North Carolina 6,10 Yes 32.9 (32.2, 33.5) 2,008 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.5)
Delaware 6,10 Yes 32.8 (30.7, 34.9) 199 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.3, 9.5)
Rhode Island 6,10 Yes 32.5 (30.6, 34.5) 238 stable stable trend -4.6 (-11.3, 2.7)
Virginia 6,10 Yes 32.3 (31.6, 33.0) 1,583 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.7, 3.5)
Florida 6,10 Yes 32.1 (31.7, 32.6) 4,634 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Washington 5,10 Yes 32.0 (31.2, 32.8) 1,306 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
California 3,8 Yes 31.8 (31.5, 32.2) 6,870 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Texas 6,10 Yes 31.8 (31.3, 32.2) 4,339 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Oregon 6,10 Yes 30.4 (29.4, 31.4) 768 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Colorado 6,10 Yes 30.2 (29.3, 31.2) 864 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Arizona 6,10 Yes 29.1 (28.4, 29.9) 1,182 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.6)
New Mexico 3,8 Yes 28.9 (27.6, 30.3) 369 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Wyoming 6,10 Yes 27.9 (25.3, 30.6) 91 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.0, 5.5)
Utah 3,8 Yes 27.6 (26.3, 28.9) 344 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/18/2018 6:45 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top