Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Colon & Rectum, 2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 33.7 (33.4, 33.9) 66,596 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Iowa 3,8 No 42.0 (39.2, 45.0) 866 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
West Virginia 2,10 No 41.7 (38.2, 45.5) 545 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 5.0)
Kentucky 3,8 No 41.4 (39.0, 43.9) 1,154 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Mississippi 2,10 No 40.1 (37.2, 43.2) 742 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.2)
Alaska 2,10 Yes 39.7 (32.7, 47.7) 126 stable stable trend -1.5 (-14.1, 13.0)
Louisiana 3,8 Yes 39.6 (37.3, 42.1) 1,098 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
District of Columbia 2,10 Yes 38.7 (32.4, 46.0) 138 stable stable trend -3.4 (-14.4, 9.0)
North Dakota 2,10 Yes 37.9 (32.2, 44.4) 167 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.3, 5.7)
Hawaii 3,8 Yes 37.9 (33.8, 42.4) 340 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Alabama 2,10 Yes 37.7 (35.5, 39.9) 1,180 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 5.7)
South Dakota 2,10 Yes 37.0 (31.9, 42.8) 200 stable stable trend -3.5 (-10.2, 3.7)
Arkansas 2,10 Yes 36.9 (34.2, 39.8) 700 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Ohio 2,10 Yes 36.9 (35.5, 38.3) 2,846 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
Tennessee 2,10 Yes 36.8 (34.9, 38.7) 1,513 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.6)
Kansas 2,10 Yes 36.6 (33.7, 39.6) 641 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.3, 4.1)
Illinois 2,10 Yes 36.5 (35.1, 37.8) 2,917 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.0)
Indiana 2,10 Yes 36.5 (34.6, 38.4) 1,484 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 1.0)
New Jersey 3,8 Yes 36.1 (34.6, 37.7) 2,138 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Nebraska 2,10 Yes 35.5 (32.1, 39.3) 412 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.7, -1.9)
Missouri 2,10 Yes 35.4 (33.5, 37.4) 1,380 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.4)
Pennsylvania 2,10 Yes 35.3 (34.1, 36.6) 3,231 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Puerto Rico 2,10 Yes 35.3 (32.9, 37.8) 875 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.2)
Minnesota 2,10 Yes 35.1 (33.1, 37.3) 1,176 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.5)
Georgia 3,8 Yes 35.0 (33.5, 36.7) 1,983 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Oklahoma 2,10 Yes 34.4 (32.0, 36.9) 809 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.4)
Maine 2,10 Yes 34.4 (30.7, 38.5) 341 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.5)
New York 2,10 Yes 34.3 (33.3, 35.4) 4,400 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.9, 0.0)
Idaho 2,10 Yes 33.9 (30.2, 38.0) 316 stable stable trend 0.6 (-8.3, 10.2)
Connecticut 3,8 Yes 33.9 (31.6, 36.4) 832 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.9)
Montana 2,10 Yes 33.7 (29.3, 38.6) 229 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.0, 2.2)
Vermont 2,10 Yes 33.5 (28.1, 39.7) 147 stable stable trend -0.6 (-9.3, 8.9)
Virginia 2,10 Yes 33.5 (31.9, 35.2) 1,662 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.9, 3.1)
New Hampshire 2,10 Yes 33.4 (29.6, 37.6) 297 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.3, 5.6)
Michigan 4,10 Yes 33.3 # (31.9, 34.8) 2,155 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Delaware 2,10 Yes 33.1 (28.6, 38.1) 209 stable stable trend -3.6 (-11.4, 5.0)
Maryland 2,10 Yes 32.9 (31.1, 34.9) 1,214 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 2.0)
Rhode Island 2,10 Yes 32.8 (28.6, 37.5) 242 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.8, 0.5)
Massachusetts 2,10 Yes 32.1 (30.4, 33.9) 1,424 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Wisconsin 2,10 Yes 31.9 (30.0, 33.8) 1,176 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.5)
North Carolina 2,10 Yes 31.8 (30.4, 33.3) 1,981 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.3)
Washington 4,10 Yes 31.7 (30.0, 33.5) 1,321 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Texas 2,10 Yes 31.1 (30.2, 32.1) 4,381 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
South Carolina 2,10 Yes 31.0 (29.0, 33.1) 970 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.0, -2.0)
California 3,8 Yes 30.9 (30.1, 31.6) 6,833 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
Florida 2,10 Yes 30.9 (29.9, 31.8) 4,516 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Nevada 2 Yes 30.4 (27.8, 33.3) 494
¶¶
¶¶
Colorado 2,10 Yes 30.0 (28.0, 32.2) 878 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Oregon 2,10 Yes 29.7 (27.5, 31.9) 770 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.2, 0.5)
Wyoming 2,10 Yes 28.9 (23.2, 35.7) 93 stable stable trend -8.4 (-19.7, 4.4)
Arizona 2,10 Yes 28.8 (27.1, 30.5) 1,203 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -0.3)
Utah 3,8 Yes 28.2 (25.3, 31.3) 360 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.8)
New Mexico 3,8 Yes 27.7 (24.8, 30.8) 357 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2017 3:18 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics . State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top