Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Colon & Rectum, 2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 33.3 (33.1, 33.6) 66,842 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Kentucky 3,8 No 43.6 (41.1, 46.2) 1,217 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
West Virginia 2,10 No 42.2 (38.6, 46.1) 551 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.7, 5.1)
Mississippi 2,10 No 41.5 (38.6, 44.6) 784 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Nebraska 2,10 Yes 39.0 (35.4, 42.9) 460 stable stable trend -1.5 (-8.4, 6.0)
Arkansas 2,10 Yes 38.3 (35.5, 41.3) 729 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Iowa 3,8 Yes 37.6 (34.9, 40.5) 788 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Ohio 2,10 Yes 37.6 (36.2, 39.0) 2,881 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Alabama 2,10 Yes 37.6 (35.4, 39.8) 1,199 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.2, 5.8)
Louisiana 3,8 Yes 37.5 (35.2, 39.9) 1,050 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Alaska 2,10 Yes 37.4 (30.8, 45.1) 124 stable stable trend 2.1 (-7.9, 13.1)
Oklahoma 2,10 Yes 36.7 (34.2, 39.3) 869 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.4)
Delaware 2,10 Yes 36.6 (31.9, 41.9) 230 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.3, 9.5)
Indiana 2,10 Yes 36.5 (34.6, 38.4) 1,492 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
Illinois 2,10 Yes 36.4 (35.1, 37.8) 2,920 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.1)
Hawaii 3,8 Yes 36.2 (32.3, 40.6) 332 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Pennsylvania 2,10 Yes 35.9 (34.6, 37.2) 3,260 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Georgia 3,8 Yes 35.8 (34.2, 37.4) 2,083 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Puerto Rico 2,10 Yes 35.6 (33.2, 38.1) 898 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
New Jersey 3,8 Yes 34.4 (32.9, 36.0) 2,026 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Tennessee 2,10 Yes 34.3 (32.5, 36.2) 1,454 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.9)
New York 2,10 Yes 34.3 (33.3, 35.4) 4,423 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.3)
Minnesota 2,10 Yes 34.3 (32.2, 36.4) 1,148 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
South Carolina 2,10 Yes 34.2 (32.1, 36.4) 1,088 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.6, 3.0)
North Dakota 2,10 Yes 34.2 (28.7, 40.4) 150 stable stable trend -2.9 (-10.8, 5.6)
South Dakota 2,10 Yes 34.1 (29.2, 39.8) 184 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.0, 3.6)
Missouri 2,10 Yes 34.0 (32.1, 35.9) 1,357 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.7)
North Carolina 2,10 Yes 33.8 (32.4, 35.3) 2,153 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.5)
Kansas 2,10 Yes 33.7 (31.0, 36.6) 602 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.9, 4.5)
Maine 2,10 Yes 33.0 (29.3, 37.0) 327 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Idaho 2,10 Yes 32.9 (29.3, 36.9) 319 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.0, 6.2)
Massachusetts 2,10 Yes 32.8 (31.1, 34.6) 1,471 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Wisconsin 2,10 Yes 32.5 (30.6, 34.4) 1,202 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.7)
Maryland 2,10 Yes 32.4 (30.5, 34.3) 1,217 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Vermont 2,10 Yes 32.3 (27.0, 38.5) 142 stable stable trend -1.6 (-8.5, 5.8)
Montana 2,10 Yes 31.7 (27.4, 36.5) 212 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.9, 3.6)
Michigan 4,10 Yes 31.3 # (29.9, 32.7) 2,056 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.5)
Connecticut 3,8 Yes 31.2 (29.0, 33.5) 779 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.9, -3.0)
Texas 2,10 Yes 31.0 (30.1, 32.0) 4,481 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
New Hampshire 2,10 Yes 30.9 (27.2, 35.0) 279 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.4, 0.7)
Florida 2,10 Yes 30.8 (29.9, 31.8) 4,621 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
California 3,8 Yes 30.8 (30.1, 31.6) 6,932 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Virginia 2,10 Yes 30.0 (28.5, 31.6) 1,544 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.7, 3.5)
Washington 4,10 Yes 29.8 (28.2, 31.6) 1,264 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
New Mexico 3,8 Yes 29.4 (26.4, 32.6) 391 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
District of Columbia 2,10 Yes 29.0 (23.5, 35.3) 102 stable stable trend -4.0 (-17.8, 12.1)
Oregon 2,10 Yes 28.9 (26.8, 31.1) 750 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Colorado 2,10 Yes 28.7 (26.8, 30.7) 876 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Arizona 2,10 Yes 28.3 (26.7, 30.0) 1,206 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.6)
Nevada 2 Yes 27.7 (25.2, 30.4) 469
¶¶
¶¶
Rhode Island 2,10 Yes 27.0 (23.2, 31.3) 192 stable stable trend -4.6 (-11.3, 2.7)
Utah 3,8 Yes 26.9 (24.1, 29.8) 355 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Wyoming 2,10 Yes 26.7 (21.2, 33.1) 89 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.0, 5.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/16/2018 2:33 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics . State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top