Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 62.4 (62.3, 62.6) 214,614 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Kentucky 3,9 96.4 (95.2, 97.7) 4,808 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
West Virginia 6,10 81.2 (79.6, 82.8) 2,003 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Arkansas 6,10 77.1 (75.8, 78.4) 2,687 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Tennessee 6,10 76.8 (75.9, 77.7) 5,653 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Mississippi 6,10 76.4 (75.0, 77.8) 2,497 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Missouri 6,10 75.8 (74.9, 76.8) 5,313 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Maine 6,10 74.6 (72.8, 76.4) 1,323 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.7, 3.8)
Indiana 6,10 74.2 (73.3, 75.2) 5,314 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Louisiana 3,9 71.4 (70.3, 72.5) 3,486 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Delaware 6,10 71.3 (69.1, 73.7) 773 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.4, 3.1)
Alabama 6,10 71.3 (70.3, 72.3) 3,999 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Oklahoma 6,10 71.2 (70.1, 72.4) 3,022 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Ohio 6,10 70.7 (70.1, 71.4) 9,648 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.8)
North Carolina 6,10 70.7 (69.9, 71.4) 7,562 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Rhode Island 6,10 69.5 (67.4, 71.7) 873 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.4, 5.1)
South Carolina 6,10 68.7 (67.7, 69.7) 3,746 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.9)
Illinois 6,10 67.9 (67.3, 68.5) 9,306 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -1.9)
New Hampshire 6,10 67.8 (66.0, 69.7) 1,057 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.2)
Michigan 5,10 67.5 # (66.8, 68.2) 7,814 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.4)
Georgia 3,9 67.3 (66.5, 68.1) 6,329 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.7)
Vermont 6,10 66.7 (64.1, 69.4) 524 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.3, -2.3)
Pennsylvania 6,10 66.3 (65.8, 66.9) 10,660 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Massachusetts 6,10 66.1 (65.3, 66.9) 5,023 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.2)
Iowa 3,8 64.6 (63.4, 65.8) 2,390 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Connecticut 3,8 63.1 (62.0, 64.2) 2,664 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Florida 6,10 63.0 (62.5, 63.4) 16,448 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.6)
Alaska 6,10 62.7 (59.5, 66.0) 345 falling falling trend -6.6 (-8.5, -4.7)
Kansas 6,10 62.2 (61.0, 63.5) 1,967 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.0)
Virginia 6,10 62.1 (61.3, 62.9) 5,315 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.7)
New York 6,10 61.8 (61.3, 62.3) 13,611 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Wisconsin 6,10 61.1 (60.3, 62.0) 4,026 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.4)
Washington 5,10 60.0 (59.2, 60.9) 4,308 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.3)
Oregon 6,10 59.3 (58.3, 60.3) 2,686 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.2)
Maryland 6,10 59.2 (58.3, 60.0) 3,675 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
District of Columbia 6,10 59.0 (56.3, 61.9) 351 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.3, 3.0)
New Jersey 3,8 59.0 (58.3, 59.6) 5,900 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.0, -2.6)
Nebraska 6,10 58.7 (57.2, 60.2) 1,203 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 3.8)
Montana 6,10 58.2 (56.3, 60.2) 719 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.2, 2.9)
South Dakota 6,10 57.8 (55.7, 60.1) 559 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.1)
North Dakota 6,10 56.9 (54.5, 59.3) 454 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 5.4)
Texas 6,10 56.1 (55.7, 56.6) 13,006 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Minnesota 6,10 55.5 (54.6, 56.4) 3,242 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.8)
Arizona 6,10 51.6 (50.9, 52.4) 3,793 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.6)
Idaho 6,10 51.1 (49.5, 52.7) 845 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 2.2)
Wyoming 6,10 47.3 (44.9, 49.9) 292 stable stable trend -6.0 (-12.4, 0.9)
Hawaii 3,8 47.2 (45.7, 48.7) 776 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
California 3,9 46.5 (46.2, 46.8) 17,075 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.4, -2.9)
Colorado 6,10 45.5 (44.6, 46.4) 2,235 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.5)
New Mexico 3,8 41.9 (40.7, 43.1) 967 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.6)
Utah 3,8 28.8 (27.8, 29.8) 633 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/26/2016 2:46 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top