Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 53.4 (53.2, 53.5) 100,643 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Alabama 6,10 53.4 (52.2, 54.5) 1,650 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.2, 1.9)
Alaska 6,10 55.6 (51.5, 59.9) 155 stable stable trend -6.3 (-14.5, 2.5)
Arizona 6,10 46.4 (45.5, 47.4) 1,829 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.5, 0.5)
Arkansas 6,10 59.4 (57.8, 61.0) 1,119 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.6)
California 3,9 41.2 (40.8, 41.6) 8,357 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.9)
Colorado 6,10 42.4 (41.3, 43.6) 1,135 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Connecticut 3,8 57.7 (56.3, 59.1) 1,354 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Delaware 6,10 62.3 (59.4, 65.2) 370 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
District of Columbia 6,10 49.7 (46.4, 53.3) 167 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.9, 6.3)
Florida 6,10 54.4 (53.9, 55.0) 7,701 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Georgia 3,9 53.2 (52.3, 54.1) 2,784 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.1)
Hawaii 3,8 38.7 (36.8, 40.6) 341 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Idaho 6,10 46.9 (44.9, 49.0) 411 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.4, 7.1)
Illinois 6,10 58.5 (57.7, 59.3) 4,451 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.4, -1.3)
Indiana 6,10 61.7 (60.6, 62.8) 2,422 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Iowa 3,8 52.7 (51.3, 54.2) 1,058 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Kansas 6,10 53.5 (51.9, 55.1) 919 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.9, 1.2)
Kentucky 3,9 80.2 (78.7, 81.8) 2,182 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Louisiana 3,9 55.5 (54.3, 56.8) 1,489 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Maine 6,10 66.0 (63.7, 68.4) 634 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.9, 4.2)
Maryland 6,10 52.9 (51.8, 54.0) 1,835 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Massachusetts 6,10 61.9 (60.8, 63.0) 2,620 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Michigan 5,10 59.1 # (58.2, 59.9) 3,732 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 1.2)
Minnesota 6,10 50.1 (49.0, 51.3) 1,574 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.5)
Mississippi 6,10 56.5 (54.9, 58.1) 1,020 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Missouri 6,10 64.7 (63.5, 65.8) 2,477 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Montana 6,10 54.9 (52.3, 57.6) 357 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.6, 14.3)
Nebraska 6,10 49.9 (48.1, 51.9) 556 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.7, 6.7)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
New Hampshire 6,10 64.4 (61.9, 66.9) 538 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
New Jersey 3,8 53.1 (52.2, 54.0) 2,991 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.5, -2.6)
New Mexico 3,8 36.8 (35.2, 38.3) 459 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
New York 6,10 54.7 (54.1, 55.3) 6,779 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
North Carolina 6,10 55.9 (55.1, 56.8) 3,317 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
North Dakota 6,10 47.5 (44.6, 50.6) 201 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.2, 6.6)
Ohio 6,10 59.7 (59.0, 60.5) 4,478 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Oklahoma 6,10 58.5 (57.1, 60.0) 1,346 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.5)
Oregon 6,10 54.9 (53.6, 56.3) 1,341 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.0, 1.3)
Pennsylvania 6,10 56.5 (55.8, 57.2) 5,014 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Rhode Island 6,10 64.0 (61.3, 66.8) 449 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.5, 7.1)
South Carolina 6,10 54.3 (53.1, 55.5) 1,623 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
South Dakota 6,10 50.9 (48.1, 53.8) 261 stable stable trend 1.5 (-6.0, 9.7)
Tennessee 6,10 61.2 (60.1, 62.3) 2,466 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Texas 6,10 45.5 (44.9, 46.0) 5,784 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.6)
Utah 3,8 24.2 (23.0, 25.5) 284 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
Vermont 6,10 61.2 (57.8, 64.7) 258 falling falling trend -6.6 (-12.5, -0.2)
Virginia 6,10 52.2 (51.3, 53.2) 2,460 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.3, -0.1)
Washington 5,10 54.7 (53.6, 55.7) 2,122 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.7)
West Virginia 6,10 65.9 (63.9, 67.9) 870 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Wisconsin 6,10 54.5 (53.4, 55.6) 1,929 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.6)
Wyoming 6,10 43.1 (39.9, 46.5) 138 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.8, 11.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/23/2016 7:10 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top