Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 52.6 (52.5, 52.8) 101,519 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Alabama 6,10 *** 52.1 (51.0, 53.3) 1,647 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.7)
Alaska 6,10 *** 53.3 (49.4, 57.4) 155 falling falling trend -8.4 (-14.5, -1.9)
Arizona 6,10 *** 45.4 (44.4, 46.3) 1,852 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.6)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 60.7 (59.1, 62.3) 1,164 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 3.9)
California 3,8 *** 39.9 (39.5, 40.3) 8,316 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Colorado 6,10 *** 41.6 (40.5, 42.7) 1,150 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.7)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 56.8 (55.4, 58.2) 1,353 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Delaware 6,10 *** 62.9 (60.1, 65.9) 386 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 49.5 (46.1, 53.0) 169 stable stable trend -0.0 (-6.4, 6.8)
Florida 6,10 *** 53.1 (52.6, 53.7) 7,734 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.0)
Georgia 3,8 *** 52.2 (51.3, 53.0) 2,814 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 38.1 (36.2, 40.0) 343 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Idaho 6,10 *** 46.8 (44.8, 48.9) 423 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.2, 1.7)
Illinois 6,10 *** 57.8 (57.0, 58.6) 4,474 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.1)
Indiana 6,10 *** 60.8 (59.7, 61.9) 2,432 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.6)
Iowa 3,8 *** 53.0 (51.6, 54.5) 1,075 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.3)
Kansas 6,10 *** 52.8 (51.3, 54.4) 919 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 3.0)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 79.7 (78.2, 81.2) 2,211 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 54.9 (53.7, 56.2) 1,502 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Maine 6,10 *** 65.2 (63.0, 67.6) 638 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.3, 5.1)
Maryland 6,10 *** 52.0 (50.9, 53.1) 1,849 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 60.5 (59.4, 61.6) 2,608 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Michigan 5,10 *** 58.8 # (58.0, 59.7) 3,786 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 50.2 (49.1, 51.3) 1,613 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.3)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 56.3 (54.8, 57.9) 1,034 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.8)
Missouri 6,10 *** 64.3 (63.1, 65.4) 2,508 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Montana 6,10 *** 53.8 (51.3, 56.4) 358 stable stable trend 1.0 (-12.0, 16.0)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 50.2 (48.4, 52.2) 567 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.0, 6.0)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 63.3 (60.9, 65.8) 545 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.3, 1.5)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 52.5 (51.6, 53.3) 3,004 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 35.9 (34.5, 37.5) 460 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.5)
New York 6,10 *** 54.2 (53.6, 54.8) 6,816 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 56.1 (55.3, 57.0) 3,422 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 48.9 (45.9, 52.0) 210 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.3, 6.8)
Ohio 6,10 *** 59.0 (58.2, 59.8) 4,487 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 58.7 (57.3, 60.1) 1,374 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
Oregon 6,10 *** 53.4 (52.1, 54.7) 1,339 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.5, 1.3)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 56.1 (55.4, 56.8) 5,044 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 12.2 (11.6, 12.8) 302 stable stable trend 1.3 (-6.3, 9.6)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 63.7 (61.0, 66.4) 453 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.9, 7.8)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 53.7 (52.5, 54.9) 1,653 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.2)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 50.8 (48.0, 53.7) 265 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.6, 8.3)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 61.0 (59.9, 62.1) 2,511 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Texas 6,10 *** 44.7 (44.2, 45.2) 5,860 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.8)
Utah 3,8 *** 24.1 (22.8, 25.3) 290 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Vermont 6,10 *** 59.7 (56.4, 63.2) 257 stable stable trend -3.9 (-11.7, 4.5)
Virginia 6,10 *** 50.8 (49.9, 51.7) 2,451 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Washington 5,10 *** 53.7 (52.6, 54.7) 2,142 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 66.2 (64.2, 68.2) 883 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.0)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 54.8 (53.7, 55.9) 1,977 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 44.1 (40.9, 47.5) 145 stable stable trend -2.4 (-13.2, 9.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/19/2017 8:13 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top