Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 60.2 (60.1, 60.3) 217,545 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
California 3,8 *** 43.3 (43.1, 43.6) 16,864 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.4, -3.3)
Florida 6,10 *** 59.7 (59.3, 60.1) 16,548 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.7)
New York 6,10 *** 60.2 (59.8, 60.7) 13,737 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Texas 6,10 *** 53.1 (52.7, 53.5) 13,139 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.1)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 64.7 (64.2, 65.3) 10,719 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Ohio 6,10 *** 69.3 (68.7, 69.9) 9,794 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Illinois 6,10 *** 66.0 (65.4, 66.6) 9,401 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Michigan 5,10 *** 65.6 # (64.9, 66.2) 7,902 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 69.2 (68.5, 69.9) 7,870 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Georgia 3,8 *** 64.9 (64.2, 65.7) 6,525 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 57.3 (56.7, 58.0) 5,940 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 75.7 (74.9, 76.6) 5,845 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Indiana 6,10 *** 72.8 (71.9, 73.7) 5,422 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Missouri 6,10 *** 74.2 (73.3, 75.1) 5,403 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Virginia 6,10 *** 58.9 (58.1, 59.6) 5,330 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.3)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 63.8 (63.0, 64.6) 5,047 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 93.5 (92.3, 94.7) 4,857 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Washington 5,10 *** 56.7 (56.0, 57.5) 4,337 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.2)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 60.0 (59.1, 60.8) 4,132 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
Alabama 6,10 *** 67.7 (66.8, 68.7) 3,967 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.7)
Arizona 6,10 *** 49.3 (48.6, 50.0) 3,902 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.2)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 66.9 (66.0, 67.9) 3,895 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Maryland 6,10 *** 57.4 (56.6, 58.3) 3,753 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 68.8 (67.8, 69.9) 3,515 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 55.2 (54.4, 56.0) 3,402 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.7)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 70.5 (69.4, 71.6) 3,111 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 78.0 (76.7, 79.3) 2,818 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Oregon 6,10 *** 56.2 (55.2, 57.2) 2,694 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.4, -1.5)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 61.0 (59.9, 62.0) 2,662 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 75.0 (73.7, 76.3) 2,554 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Iowa 3,8 *** 63.6 (62.5, 64.8) 2,425 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Colorado 6,10 *** 43.3 (42.5, 44.1) 2,295 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.5)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 80.3 (78.7, 81.9) 2,039 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Kansas 6,10 *** 60.9 (59.7, 62.1) 1,991 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.5)
Maine 6,10 *** 72.5 (70.7, 74.3) 1,344 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 4.1)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 59.0 (57.5, 60.5) 1,252 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.4)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 65.7 (63.9, 67.5) 1,084 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.0)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 40.3 (39.1, 41.4) 979 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 69.7 (67.6, 71.8) 903 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 4.8)
Idaho 6,10 *** 50.7 (49.2, 52.3) 898 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Delaware 6,10 *** 71.2 (69.0, 73.4) 822 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.5, 3.0)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 17.7 (17.1, 18.3) 804 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.7, 3.6)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 46.2 (44.7, 47.7) 798 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Montana 6,10 *** 55.7 (53.9, 57.6) 729 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.5, 1.5)
Utah 3,8 *** 27.6 (26.6, 28.6) 647 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 58.1 (56.0, 60.3) 584 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.4)
Vermont 6,10 *** 63.4 (60.9, 65.9) 522 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.5)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 58.2 (55.9, 60.7) 480 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.2, 1.4)
Alaska 6,10 *** 57.2 (54.3, 60.2) 342 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.0, -0.8)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 53.4 (50.8, 56.1) 331 stable stable trend -7.5 (-15.2, 0.8)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 44.5 (42.2, 46.9) 288 stable stable trend -2.9 (-10.5, 5.3)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/18/2018 12:58 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top