Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Melanoma of the Skin, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 16.4 (16.3, 16.5) 29,317 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.8, 1.9)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 6.3 (5.1, 7.6) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-9.6, 9.1)
Alaska 6,10 *** 13.0 (11.3, 15.0) 43 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.3, 6.6)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 2.6 (2.3, 2.9) 56 stable stable trend 11.3 (-15.3, 46.3)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 20.1 (17.9, 22.6) 61 stable stable trend -4.9 (-22.6, 16.8)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 20.9 (18.8, 23.2) 79 stable stable trend -1.9 (-17.1, 16.1)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 21.2 (19.3, 23.3) 95 stable stable trend 5.6 (-4.0, 16.2)
Vermont 6,10 *** 25.2 (23.0, 27.6) 101 stable stable trend 1.6 (-12.0, 17.5)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 14.8 (13.6, 16.1) 121 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.3, 4.2)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 19.4 (17.8, 21.0) 126 stable stable trend 2.4 (-7.7, 13.7)
Montana 6,10 *** 22.2 (20.4, 24.1) 128 stable stable trend 4.1 (-2.5, 11.1)
Delaware 6,10 *** 23.3 (21.5, 25.2) 132 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.4)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 11.9 (11.1, 12.9) 143 stable stable trend -11.2 (-21.5, 0.5)
Maine 6,10 *** 20.4 (19.0, 21.9) 175 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.9, 11.8)
Idaho 6,10 *** 21.9 (20.5, 23.4) 184 stable stable trend 5.0 (-1.1, 11.3)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 18.8 (17.6, 20.1) 188 stable stable trend 9.7 (-3.0, 24.1)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 17.5 (16.4, 18.7) 195 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.4, 7.3)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 24.6 (23.0, 26.2) 198 stable stable trend 2.0 (-12.0, 18.2)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 13.4 (12.6, 14.2) 223 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.6, 8.7)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 14.2 (13.4, 15.0) 240 stable stable trend 7.7 (-1.4, 17.7)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 13.5 (12.8, 14.2) 284 rising rising trend 7.5 (0.5, 14.9)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 11.4 (10.8, 12.0) 287 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.8, 4.0)
Kansas 6,10 *** 20.0 (19.0, 21.1) 311 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.5, 5.7)
Utah 3,8 *** 27.7 (26.4, 29.0) 348 rising rising trend 3.9 (3.4, 4.4)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 16.9 (16.1, 17.7) 379 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)
Iowa 3,8 *** 22.7 (21.7, 23.8) 387 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.8, 3.9)
Alabama 6,10 *** 15.6 (14.9, 16.3) 440 stable stable trend -2.7 (-11.3, 6.8)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 17.2 (16.5, 17.9) 477 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.7, 5.7)
Missouri 6,10 *** 14.0 (13.5, 14.6) 484 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.7)
Colorado 6,10 *** 17.5 (16.7, 18.2) 484 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.2)
Arizona 6,10 *** 13.8 (13.2, 14.3) 514 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.9, 10.6)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 21.3 (20.4, 22.1) 530 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.1, 2.8)
Oregon 6,10 *** 24.3 (23.3, 25.2) 546 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.6, 3.3)
Maryland 6,10 *** 16.4 (15.8, 17.1) 561 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.7, 6.6)
Indiana 6,10 *** 15.7 (15.2, 16.3) 572 stable stable trend 0.6 (-7.6, 9.6)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 16.1 (15.5, 16.7) 605 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.2, 1.5)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 19.5 (18.8, 20.2) 631 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.5, 6.3)
Virginia 6,10 *** 14.9 (14.4, 15.4) 688 stable stable trend 3.0 (-3.5, 10.0)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 17.2 (16.6, 17.8) 702 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.8, -1.5)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 25.3 (24.5, 26.1) 748 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 4.2)
Washington 5,10 *** 22.7 (22.0, 23.4) 864 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.1, 1.1)
Michigan 5,10 *** 15.8 # (15.3, 16.3) 896 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.1)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 17.2 (16.7, 17.7) 922 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 18.0 (17.5, 18.5) 1,014 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 4.9)
Georgia 3,8 *** 19.3 (18.7, 19.8) 1,018 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.8, 3.1)
Illinois 6,10 *** 15.1 (14.7, 15.5) 1,086 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.2, 6.4)
Ohio 6,10 *** 17.2 (16.7, 17.6) 1,147 stable stable trend 3.0 (-3.4, 9.8)
Texas 6,10 *** 9.6 (9.4, 9.8) 1,266 stable stable trend -3.1 (-10.9, 5.4)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 19.1 (18.7, 19.6) 1,489 stable stable trend 5.6 (-0.7, 12.4)
New York 6,10 *** 14.5 (14.2, 14.8) 1,695 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.9, 7.1)
Florida 6,10 *** 15.8 (15.5, 16.2) 2,020 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.4, 9.5)
California 3,8 *** 16.0 (15.8, 16.2) 3,300 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.4, 6.3)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/24/2017 8:13 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top