Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Melanoma of the Skin, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 16.2 (16.1, 16.3) 28,423 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
District of Columbia 6,10 6.7 (5.5, 8.0) 24 stable stable trend -5.9 (-14.1, 3.0)
Alaska 6,10 12.0 (10.3, 13.9) 40 stable stable trend 8.3 (-0.6, 18.0)
Wyoming 6,10 19.1 (16.8, 21.5) 57 stable stable trend -2.4 (-26.1, 28.8)
North Dakota 6,10 21.2 (19.1, 23.5) 79 stable stable trend 0.0 (-9.6, 10.7)
South Dakota 6,10 19.2 (17.4, 21.2) 86 stable stable trend 5.4 (-5.4, 17.4)
Vermont 6,10 25.5 (23.2, 27.9) 99 stable stable trend -0.8 (-14.9, 15.5)
Hawaii 3,8 14.6 (13.4, 15.9) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
Montana 6,10 21.0 (19.3, 22.8) 119 stable stable trend 2.6 (-3.0, 8.5)
Rhode Island 6,10 19.0 (17.5, 20.6) 122 stable stable trend 2.5 (-7.7, 13.7)
Delaware 6,10 23.5 (21.6, 25.4) 129 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.8)
New Mexico 3,8 12.7 (11.8, 13.7) 150 stable stable trend -9.4 (-21.1, 4.0)
Maine 6,10 19.9 (18.5, 21.3) 168 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.1, 10.7)
Nebraska 6,10 17.3 (16.2, 18.6) 172 stable stable trend 5.5 (-6.9, 19.6)
Idaho 6,10 21.7 (20.3, 23.2) 178 stable stable trend 1.9 (-6.8, 11.5)
New Hampshire 6,10 22.9 (21.3, 24.5) 181 stable stable trend -2.4 (-11.8, 7.9)
West Virginia 6,10 18.1 (16.9, 19.3) 198 stable stable trend -2.8 (-10.8, 5.9)
Mississippi 6,10 13.3 (12.5, 14.2) 219 stable stable trend -0.1 (-7.4, 7.8)
Arkansas 6,10 13.8 (13.0, 14.6) 229 stable stable trend 5.1 (-6.4, 18.0)
Oklahoma 6,10 13.0 (12.3, 13.7) 271 stable stable trend 1.3 (-8.9, 12.6)
Louisiana 3,9 11.6 (11.0, 12.2) 289 stable stable trend -0.9 (-9.6, 8.8)
Kansas 6,10 19.6 (18.6, 20.6) 302 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.0, 5.9)
Utah 3,8 26.0 (24.7, 27.3) 320 rising rising trend 3.7 (3.1, 4.2)
Iowa 3,8 22.5 (21.5, 23.6) 379 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.9, 4.0)
Connecticut 3,8 17.1 (16.3, 17.9) 380 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.6, -2.2)
Alabama 6,10 16.1 (15.4, 16.8) 450 stable stable trend -3.1 (-11.6, 6.3)
Colorado 6,10 17.5 (16.8, 18.3) 475 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.0)
South Carolina 6,10 17.7 (17.0, 18.5) 480 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.6, 4.7)
Missouri 6,10 14.1 (13.5, 14.7) 483 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.8, 3.1)
Arizona 6,10 13.5 (13.0, 14.1) 490 stable stable trend 0.1 (-8.5, 9.4)
Kentucky 3,9 20.3 (19.5, 21.2) 502 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.2, 5.2)
Oregon 6,10 24.3 (23.4, 25.3) 537 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.7, 7.7)
Maryland 6,10 16.2 (15.6, 16.8) 542 stable stable trend 1.0 (-6.3, 8.9)
Indiana 6,10 15.2 (14.7, 15.8) 547 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.2, 6.1)
Wisconsin 6,10 18.9 (18.2, 19.6) 604 stable stable trend 1.3 (-5.9, 9.2)
Tennessee 6,10 16.8 (16.2, 17.4) 619 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.1, 0.4)
Virginia 6,10 14.6 (14.1, 15.1) 664 stable stable trend 1.3 (-6.4, 9.7)
Massachusetts 6,10 17.9 (17.3, 18.5) 715 stable stable trend -3.8 (-7.6, 0.1)
Minnesota 6,10 24.6 (23.8, 25.5) 716 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.7)
Washington 5,10 22.6 (21.9, 23.3) 842 stable stable trend -1.8 (-8.3, 5.2)
New Jersey 3,8 17.1 (16.6, 17.6) 905 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.8, 0.3)
Michigan 5,10 16.1 # (15.7, 16.6) 908 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.1, 6.0)
Georgia 3,9 18.4 (17.9, 18.9) 952 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.0, 8.4)
North Carolina 6,10 17.9 (17.4, 18.5) 986 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.7, 4.2)
Illinois 6,10 15.0 (14.5, 15.4) 1,063 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.1, 5.7)
Ohio 6,10 17.0 (16.5, 17.4) 1,120 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.8, 1.1)
Texas 6,10 9.7 (9.4, 9.9) 1,246 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.3, 5.1)
Pennsylvania 6,10 18.1 (17.6, 18.5) 1,398 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.5, 9.7)
New York 6,10 14.5 (14.2, 14.8) 1,677 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.2, 6.7)
Florida 6,10 15.2 (14.9, 15.5) 1,888 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.0, 9.1)
California 3,9 15.6 (15.3, 15.8) 3,144 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.9)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/30/2016 4:46 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top