Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Breast, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 123.3 (123.1, 123.5) 224,504 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Alabama 6,10 119.3 (117.5, 121.1) 3,506 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Alaska 6,10 123.5 (117.9, 129.4) 404 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.0)
Arizona 6,10 111.0 (109.4, 112.5) 4,146 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Arkansas 6,10 111.5 (109.2, 113.8) 1,977 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.1, 4.9)
California 3,9 121.4 (120.8, 122.1) 24,656 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Colorado 6,10 124.8 (122.9, 126.7) 3,450 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
Connecticut 3,8 137.8 (135.6, 140.0) 3,101 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Delaware 6,10 130.1 (125.8, 134.4) 743 stable stable trend 2.6 (-4.0, 9.7)
District of Columbia 6,10 143.0 (137.2, 149.1) 468 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.2, 4.6)
Florida 6,10 115.3 (114.5, 116.2) 14,705 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Georgia 3,9 123.4 (122.1, 124.8) 6,554 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Hawaii 3,8 134.4 (130.8, 138.1) 1,107 stable stable trend 5.0 (-3.8, 14.6)
Idaho 6,10 119.4 (116.0, 122.7) 1,025 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.2)
Illinois 6,10 128.5 (127.3, 129.7) 9,523 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Indiana 6,10 120.0 (118.4, 121.6) 4,558 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Iowa 3,8 122.6 (120.3, 124.9) 2,286 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
Kansas 6,10 122.0 (119.5, 124.4) 1,995 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.4, 3.2)
Kentucky 3,9 122.0 (120.1, 123.9) 3,207 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Louisiana 3,9 123.4 (121.5, 125.4) 3,223 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Maine 6,10 124.5 (121.2, 128.0) 1,125 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.5)
Maryland 6,10 130.2 (128.5, 131.9) 4,509 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.7)
Massachusetts 6,10 136.0 (134.3, 137.6) 5,531 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.0)
Michigan 5,10 123.0 # (121.7, 124.2) 7,426 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.4)
Minnesota 6,10 130.2 (128.3, 132.0) 3,998 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.1)
Mississippi 6,10 116.1 (113.8, 118.5) 2,003 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.4)
Missouri 6,10 124.8 (123.1, 126.5) 4,558 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 2.9)
Montana 6,10 122.7 (118.7, 126.8) 765 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.1, -0.1)
Nebraska 6,10 120.7 (117.7, 123.8) 1,277 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.8)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
New Hampshire 6,10 138.1 (134.4, 141.8) 1,141 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.2, 7.2)
New Jersey 3,8 131.4 (130.0, 132.8) 7,105 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
New Mexico 3,8 112.8 (110.1, 115.6) 1,371 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.1)
New York 6,10 128.4 (127.5, 129.3) 15,147 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.8)
North Carolina 6,10 128.4 (127.1, 129.8) 7,364 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
North Dakota 6,10 124.6 (119.5, 129.9) 487 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.9)
Ohio 6,10 122.0 (120.8, 123.2) 8,722 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.8)
Oklahoma 6,10 117.7 (115.6, 119.8) 2,588 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Oregon 6,10 128.1 (126.0, 130.2) 3,027 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Pennsylvania 6,10 129.0 (127.9, 130.1) 10,627 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Rhode Island 6,10 130.4 (126.4, 134.5) 863 stable stable trend 2.0 (-7.2, 12.1)
South Carolina 6,10 125.6 (123.8, 127.5) 3,599 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
South Dakota 6,10 130.6 (125.9, 135.5) 624 stable stable trend 6.2 (-0.1, 12.9)
Tennessee 6,10 121.7 (120.1, 123.3) 4,725 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Texas 6,10 112.3 (111.4, 113.1) 14,574 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.5)
Utah 3,8 112.7 (110.0, 115.5) 1,339 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Vermont 6,10 128.3 (123.2, 133.5) 521 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Virginia 6,10 125.5 (124.0, 127.0) 5,876 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
Washington 5,10 135.6 (133.9, 137.3) 5,253 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.0)
West Virginia 6,10 114.4 (111.6, 117.2) 1,405 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3)
Wisconsin 6,10 127.2 (125.5, 128.9) 4,312 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Wyoming 6,10 109.6 (104.4, 115.1) 349 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.2, 5.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2016 1:47 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top