Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Breast, 2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 124.8 (124.3, 125.3) 242,476 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
New Hampshire 2,10 *** 145.9 (137.7, 154.4) 1,302 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 5.2)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 143.9 (138.8, 149.1) 3,322 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.0)
Massachusetts 2,10 *** 137.7 (134.1, 141.4) 5,884 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Rhode Island 2,10 *** 136.6 (127.7, 146.1) 939 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.0, 5.0)
Delaware 2,10 *** 136.2 (126.7, 146.2) 840 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.6, 9.6)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 134.8 (126.9, 143.1) 1,179 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 134.8 (131.7, 138.0) 7,584 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.6)
Minnesota 2,10 *** 134.5 (130.4, 138.7) 4,367 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.9)
Illinois 2,10 *** 134.5 (131.8, 137.1) 10,354 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.8)
New York 2,10 *** 134.0 (131.9, 136.1) 16,359 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
North Dakota 2,10 *** 133.1 (121.9, 145.1) 557 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.5, 7.8)
North Carolina 2,10 *** 132.6 (129.7, 135.6) 8,284 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.1)
Washington 4,10 *** 132.0 (128.5, 135.7) 5,628 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Maryland 2,10 *** 131.4 (127.6, 135.2) 4,869 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4)
Pennsylvania 2,10 *** 131.3 (128.7, 133.9) 11,075 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.2)
Vermont 2,10 *** 130.5 (119.3, 142.5) 552 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.6)
Montana 2,10 *** 130.1 (121.1, 139.7) 848 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.3, 9.1)
Missouri 2,10 *** 129.9 (126.2, 133.7) 4,938 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
South Carolina 2,10 *** 129.9 (125.8, 134.1) 4,077 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Kansas 2,10 *** 129.7 (124.2, 135.4) 2,220 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 4.8)
Iowa 3,8 *** 129.0 (123.7, 134.4) 2,467 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Wisconsin 2,10 *** 129.0 (125.1, 132.9) 4,607 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Ohio 2,10 *** 127.9 (125.3, 130.6) 9,472 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Nebraska 2,10 *** 127.7 (120.9, 134.8) 1,405 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.7)
South Dakota 2,10 *** 127.4 (117.3, 138.1) 647 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.5, 6.0)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 126.8 (122.5, 131.2) 3,503 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 126.6 (122.3, 131.0) 3,520 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.1)
Georgia 3,8 *** 126.4 (123.5, 129.4) 7,374 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.3)
Idaho 2,10 *** 124.7 (117.4, 132.3) 1,170 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 4.4)
Maine 2,10 *** 124.5 (117.0, 132.3) 1,173 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.7)
Virginia 2,10 *** 124.5 (121.4, 127.7) 6,288 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
Colorado 2,10 *** 123.4 (119.4, 127.5) 3,741 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.4)
Alabama 2,10 *** 123.3 (119.3, 127.4) 3,813 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.7)
Tennessee 2,10 *** 122.2 (118.7, 125.7) 5,053 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.5)
Alaska 2,10 *** 122.0 (110.1, 134.8) 426 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.6)
Oklahoma 2,10 *** 121.5 (116.9, 126.3) 2,804 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.4)
California 3,8 *** 121.4 (119.9, 122.9) 26,731 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Indiana 2,10 *** 121.3 (117.8, 124.9) 4,858 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4)
District of Columbia 2,10 *** 121.1 (109.5, 133.7) 414 stable stable trend -4.6 (-10.4, 1.7)
West Virginia 2,10 *** 119.6 (113.3, 126.1) 1,495 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.5)
Michigan 4,10 *** 119.0 # (116.2, 121.8) 7,511 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Mississippi 2,10 *** 117.3 (112.2, 122.5) 2,121 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.5, 2.5)
Arkansas 2,10 *** 117.1 (112.0, 122.3) 2,168 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.5, 5.6)
Oregon 2,10 *** 115.6 (111.3, 120.0) 2,954 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.0)
Florida 2,10 *** 113.8 (112.0, 115.7) 15,822 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Utah 3,8 *** 113.4 (107.7, 119.4) 1,505 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Texas 2,10 *** 112.2 (110.5, 114.0) 16,136 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Arizona 2,10 *** 110.9 (107.7, 114.3) 4,619 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 107.8 (102.0, 113.8) 1,409 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Nevada 2 *** 104.7 (99.7, 109.8) 1,740
¶¶
¶¶
Wyoming 2,10 *** 104.0 (92.8, 116.2) 340 stable stable trend -1.3 (-9.7, 7.9)
Puerto Rico 2,10 *** 93.1 (89.1, 97.3) 2,184 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/18/2018 2:36 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics . State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top