Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 7.2?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 No 7.5 (7.5, 7.6) 12,408 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
California 3,8 No 7.3 (7.1, 7.5) 1,428 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Texas 6,10 No 9.2 (9.0, 9.5) 1,189 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Florida 6,10 No 8.6 (8.4, 8.9) 927 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.5)
New York 6,10 No 7.7 (7.5, 8.0) 840 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.2, 4.7)
Illinois 6,10 No 7.7 (7.4, 8.0) 531 stable stable trend 0.6 (-7.0, 8.7)
Pennsylvania 6,10 No 7.4 (7.1, 7.7) 512 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.7, 5.7)
Ohio 6,10 No 7.4 (7.1, 7.7) 455 stable stable trend 0.7 (-7.4, 9.5)
Georgia 3,8 No 7.7 (7.3, 8.0) 396 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
New Jersey 3,8 No 7.6 (7.3, 8.0) 380 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.9, -2.4)
North Carolina 6,10 Yes 7.2 (6.8, 7.5) 374 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.8, 7.9)
Michigan 5,10 Yes 6.6 # (6.3, 6.9) 339 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.3, 2.3)
Tennessee 6,10 No 8.5 (8.1, 9.0) 291 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.6, 4.4)
Virginia 6,10 Yes 6.3 (5.9, 6.6) 272 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.2, 8.2)
Missouri 6,10 No 8.3 (7.9, 8.8) 262 stable stable trend -1.6 (-10.9, 8.7)
Indiana 6,10 No 7.6 (7.2, 8.0) 255 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Puerto Rico 6,10 No 12.9 (12.2, 13.7) 254 stable stable trend 0.4 (-7.4, 8.8)
Washington 5,10 Yes 6.8 (6.4, 7.2) 242 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.7, 7.2)
Alabama 6,10 No 8.6 (8.1, 9.2) 222 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.4, 10.8)
Arizona 6,10 Yes 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 214 stable stable trend -4.4 (-10.2, 1.8)
Maryland 6,10 Yes 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 210 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.5, 0.8)
Louisiana 3,8 No 8.9 (8.3, 9.5) 209 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Kentucky 3,8 No 8.7 (8.1, 9.3) 198 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Massachusetts 6,10 Yes 5.2 (4.9, 5.6) 191 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.6, 5.9)
South Carolina 6,10 No 7.7 (7.2, 8.2) 191 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.8, 5.6)
Wisconsin 6,10 Yes 6.2 (5.8, 6.6) 186 stable stable trend 0.3 (-8.2, 9.7)
Oklahoma 6,10 No 9.2 (8.6, 9.9) 173 stable stable trend -0.8 (-10.7, 10.2)
Colorado 6,10 Yes 5.9 (5.5, 6.4) 157 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.5, 6.8)
Minnesota 6,10 Yes 5.5 (5.1, 5.9) 155 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.0, -3.3)
Mississippi 6,10 No 9.6 (8.9, 10.4) 149 stable stable trend -1.5 (-11.5, 9.5)
Arkansas 6,10 No 9.6 (8.9, 10.4) 145 stable stable trend -1.4 (-14.7, 14.1)
Oregon 6,10 Yes 6.5 (6.0, 7.0) 131 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 6.0)
Connecticut 3,8 Yes 6.7 (6.2, 7.3) 131 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Iowa 3,8 Yes 7.1 (6.5, 7.7) 108 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Kansas 6,10 No 7.4 (6.8, 8.1) 104 stable stable trend -1.9 (-13.6, 11.4)
West Virginia 6,10 No 9.8 (8.9, 10.7) 97 falling falling trend -7.6 (-14.5, -0.1)
New Mexico 3,8 No 7.5 (6.8, 8.3) 78 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Nebraska 6,10 No 7.3 (6.5, 8.1) 66 stable stable trend 7.0 (-1.1, 15.8)
Utah 3,8 Yes 5.1 (4.6, 5.7) 63 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Hawaii 3,8 No 7.4 (6.5, 8.4) 52
*
*
Idaho 6,10 Yes 6.4 (5.6, 7.2) 49 stable stable trend -5.1 (-13.8, 4.5)
Maine 6,10 Yes 6.1 (5.3, 7.0) 45 stable stable trend -3.6 (-20.7, 17.1)
Delaware 6,10 No 8.3 (7.2, 9.5) 42 stable stable trend -1.8 (-15.7, 14.4)
Rhode Island 6,10 Yes 6.7 (5.8, 7.8) 38 stable stable trend 9.6 (-6.5, 28.4)
New Hampshire 6,10 Yes 4.6 (3.9, 5.3) 34 stable stable trend -2.0 (-14.6, 12.5)
Montana 6,10 Yes 6.2 (5.2, 7.2) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-18.1, 19.9)
District of Columbia 6,10 No 9.9 (8.4, 11.6) 32 stable stable trend -5.2 (-24.9, 19.6)
South Dakota 6,10 Yes 7.1 (5.9, 8.4) 29 stable stable trend 8.4 (-8.0, 27.8)
Alaska 6,10 Yes 6.3 (5.1, 7.7) 21 stable stable trend 4.6 (-17.4, 32.3)
Wyoming 6,10 No 7.5 (6.1, 9.1) 21 stable stable trend -10.8 (-30.2, 13.8)
North Dakota 6,10 Yes 4.9 (3.9, 6.1) 17 stable stable trend -3.6 (-31.7, 35.9)
Vermont 6,10 Yes 4.6 (3.6, 5.8) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-18.4, 18.6)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/17/2017 7:06 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top