State Cancer Profiles

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/28/2016 4:43 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.
Incidence Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
Average Annual Count Recent Trend Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
US (SEER+NPCR)1,10 7.6 (7.5, 7.7) 12,404 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)
New Hampshire6,10 4.6 (3.9, 5.4) 34 falling falling trend -7.6 (-14.3, -0.3)
Vermont6,10 4.7 (3.7, 5.9) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-13.5, 20.0)
Utah3,8 5.2 (4.6, 5.8) 63 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Massachusetts6,10 5.2 (4.9, 5.6) 191 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.5, -0.7)
North Dakota6,10 5.4 (4.3, 6.6) 18 stable stable trend -10.9 (-36.5, 25.0)
Minnesota6,10 5.8 (5.4, 6.2) 160 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.4, -2.7)
Colorado6,10 5.9 (5.5, 6.3) 153 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 1.4)
Wisconsin6,10 6.0 (5.6, 6.5) 179 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.0, 4.9)
Maine6,10 6.1 (5.2, 7.0) 45 stable stable trend -4.6 (-20.9, 15.2)
Idaho6,10 6.1 (5.4, 7.0) 47 stable stable trend -0.3 (-17.8, 21.0)
Virginia6,10 6.2 (5.8, 6.5) 266 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.7, 3.3)
Montana6,10 6.3 (5.3, 7.4) 33 stable stable trend -8.7 (-24.8, 10.8)
Rhode Island6,10 6.3 (5.4, 7.4) 36 stable stable trend 5.9 (-12.1, 27.7)
Maryland6,10 6.6 (6.2, 7.0) 209 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.1, 0.1)
Oregon6,10 6.6 (6.1, 7.1) 131 stable stable trend -1.9 (-10.8, 7.8)
Iowa3,8 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) 102 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Connecticut3,8 6.7 (6.2, 7.3) 130 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.9, 10.6)
Arizona6,10 6.7 (6.3, 7.2) 218 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.3, 1.9)
South Dakota6,10 6.8 (5.7, 8.1) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-16.0, 20.2)
Michigan5,10 6.8 # (6.5, 7.2) 351 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.2, 1.9)
Washington5,10 6.9 (6.5, 7.3) 242 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.6, 1.8)
North Carolina6,10 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) 360 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.6, 7.2)
Alaska6,10 7.1 (5.8, 8.5) 24 stable stable trend -6.1 (-30.7, 27.2)
New Mexico3,8 7.2 (6.4, 8.0) 75 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Nebraska6,10 7.2 (6.4, 8.1) 64 stable stable trend -2.2 (-13.1, 10.1)
Kansas6,10 7.3 (6.7, 8.0) 102 stable stable trend -3.9 (-14.3, 7.7)
Hawaii3,8 7.4 (6.5, 8.4) 52 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.3)
California3,9 7.5 (7.3, 7.6) 1,436 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.4)
Ohio6,10 7.5 (7.2, 7.8) 456 stable stable trend -2.6 (-10.8, 6.4)
Pennsylvania6,10 7.6 (7.3, 7.9) 530 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.9, 5.1)
Indiana6,10 7.6 (7.2, 8.1) 256 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Illinois6,10 7.7 (7.4, 8.0) 527 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.8, 0.7)
Georgia3,9 7.7 (7.4, 8.1) 391 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.4, 1.9)
New Jersey3,8 7.9 (7.5, 8.2) 390 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.1, -2.5)
New York6,10 7.9 (7.6, 8.1) 852 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.8, 4.1)
Wyoming6,10 8.0 (6.6, 9.7) 22 stable stable trend -7.8 (-28.4, 18.6)
South Carolina6,10 8.1 (7.6, 8.6) 198 stable stable trend -7.1 (-15.6, 2.3)
Delaware6,10 8.3 (7.2, 9.6) 42 stable stable trend -5.7 (-12.7, 1.9)
Missouri6,10 8.5 (8.0, 8.9) 266 stable stable trend -0.5 (-9.9, 9.8)
Alabama6,10 8.6 (8.1, 9.1) 219 stable stable trend -0.0 (-8.8, 9.6)
Kentucky3,9 8.7 (8.1, 9.3) 197 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.7, 4.9)
Tennessee6,10 8.7 (8.2, 9.2) 295 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.5, 4.7)
Louisiana3,9 8.8 (8.2, 9.3) 203 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.8)
Florida6,10 8.9 (8.6, 9.1) 933 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.7, 2.0)
Texas6,10 9.2 (8.9, 9.4) 1,162 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
District of Columbia6,10 9.3 (7.8, 10.9) 29 stable stable trend 0.6 (-29.8, 44.1)
Mississippi6,10 9.3 (8.6, 10.0) 144 stable stable trend -2.6 (-12.4, 8.3)
Oklahoma6,10 9.4 (8.8, 10.1) 177 stable stable trend -4.5 (-13.1, 4.9)
Arkansas6,10 9.9 (9.1, 10.6) 147 stable stable trend -0.7 (-12.7, 13.0)
West Virginia6,10 10.0 (9.1, 10.9) 99 stable stable trend -6.1 (-15.5, 4.4)
Nevada6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶