Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 7.2?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 No 7.6 (7.5, 7.8) 12,845 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Puerto Rico 2,10 No 13.2 (11.6, 15.0) 255 stable stable trend 0.9 (-6.8, 9.2)
Arkansas 2,10 No 10.4 (8.8, 12.2) 162 stable stable trend 4.9 (-4.8, 15.6)
Louisiana 3,8 No 9.8 (8.5, 11.2) 236 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Kentucky 3,8 No 9.4 (8.1, 10.8) 212 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Alabama 2,10 No 9.4 (8.2, 10.7) 237 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.3, 9.2)
Texas 2,10 No 9.1 (8.6, 9.7) 1,247 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Mississippi 2,10 No 9.1 (7.6, 10.8) 145 stable stable trend -0.9 (-11.0, 10.4)
Kansas 2,10 No 9.0 (7.4, 10.8) 126 rising rising trend 8.1 (3.6, 12.8)
District of Columbia 2,10 No 8.9 (6.0, 12.6) 33 stable stable trend -7.4 (-24.5, 13.6)
Nevada 2 No 8.7 (7.2, 10.3) 125
¶¶
¶¶
Florida 2,10 No 8.7 (8.1, 9.3) 947 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.5)
Indiana 2,10 No 8.6 (7.6, 9.7) 289 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.7, 7.5)
Oklahoma 2,10 No 8.5 (7.3, 10.0) 164 stable stable trend 1.3 (-7.3, 10.7)
Delaware 2,10 No 8.3 (5.8, 11.5) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-14.3, 16.7)
Alaska 2,10 No 8.2 (5.4, 11.9) 29 stable stable trend 4.2 (-12.4, 23.8)
Missouri 2,10 No 8.2 (7.2, 9.3) 255 stable stable trend -2.0 (-11.3, 8.2)
West Virginia 2,10 No 8.2 (6.4, 10.3) 80 stable stable trend -5.3 (-11.0, 0.9)
Tennessee 2,10 No 8.2 (7.2, 9.2) 288 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.8, 4.6)
Georgia 3,8 No 8.1 (7.4, 8.9) 435 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
New Jersey 3,8 No 8.1 (7.3, 8.9) 407 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
South Carolina 2,10 No 8.1 (7.0, 9.3) 216 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.8, 6.8)
New Mexico 3,8 No 7.9 (6.2, 9.9) 80 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Ohio 2,10 No 7.8 (7.1, 8.6) 476 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.7, 8.6)
Nebraska 2,10 No 7.8 (6.1, 9.9) 73 stable stable trend 3.9 (-4.8, 13.5)
New York 2,10 No 7.8 (7.3, 8.4) 865 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.6, 5.7)
Pennsylvania 2,10 No 7.4 (6.7, 8.1) 519 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.4, 2.2)
Wisconsin 2,10 No 7.3 (6.3, 8.4) 214 stable stable trend 5.3 (-3.0, 14.4)
Montana 2,10 No 7.3 (5.0, 10.2) 38 stable stable trend 2.7 (-16.1, 25.8)
Arizona 2,10 No 7.3 (6.3, 8.3) 241 stable stable trend 0.5 (-9.3, 11.4)
Illinois 2,10 No 7.2 (6.6, 7.9) 495 stable stable trend -0.6 (-8.8, 8.3)
Michigan 4,10 No 7.2 # (6.5, 8.0) 382 stable stable trend -0.1 (-8.1, 8.6)
Rhode Island 2,10 Yes 7.2 (5.0, 9.9) 39 stable stable trend 7.9 (-11.5, 31.6)
Iowa 3,8 Yes 7.2 (5.9, 8.7) 114 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
California 3,8 Yes 7.1 (6.7, 7.5) 1,426 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Oregon 2,10 Yes 7.0 (5.8, 8.2) 141 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 4.4)
North Carolina 2,10 Yes 6.9 (6.2, 7.6) 370 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.2, 3.3)
Washington 4,10 Yes 6.8 (6.0, 7.7) 247 stable stable trend 1.0 (-6.0, 8.5)
Maryland 2,10 Yes 6.8 (5.9, 7.7) 228 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.2, 5.6)
Hawaii 3,8 Yes 6.5 (4.7, 8.7) 46
*
*
Colorado 2,10 Yes 6.3 (5.4, 7.4) 177 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.2, 6.8)
Minnesota 2,10 Yes 6.2 (5.3, 7.3) 169 stable stable trend -0.2 (-11.9, 13.0)
New Hampshire 2,10 Yes 6.1 (4.3, 8.4) 41 stable stable trend 7.1 (-9.7, 27.0)
Connecticut 3,8 Yes 6.0 (4.9, 7.2) 121 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Virginia 2,10 Yes 5.8 (5.1, 6.6) 261 stable stable trend -0.7 (-8.0, 7.2)
Idaho 2,10 Yes 5.7 (4.2, 7.7) 47 stable stable trend -4.6 (-13.5, 5.1)
Maine 2,10 Yes 5.7 (4.0, 7.9) 39 stable stable trend -3.5 (-21.4, 18.4)
South Dakota 2,10 Yes 5.4 (3.3, 8.2) 24 stable stable trend -3.0 (-22.6, 21.6)
Massachusetts 2,10 Yes 5.1 (4.4, 6.0) 193 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.4, 6.2)
Utah 3,8 Yes 5.0 (3.9, 6.5) 64 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.3)
North Dakota 2,10 ***
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Vermont 2,10 ***
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming 2,10 ***
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/18/2018 1:58 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics . State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top