Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Ovary, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.6 (11.5, 11.7) 21,294 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
District of Columbia 6,10 10.7 (9.1, 12.4) 36 stable stable trend 7.7 (-20.2, 45.5)
Alaska 6,10 11.6 (9.9, 13.5) 36 stable stable trend 4.0 (-16.8, 30.0)
Wyoming 6,10 12.2 (10.5, 14.1) 38 stable stable trend -3.7 (-20.7, 16.9)
North Dakota 6,10 9.9 (8.5, 11.4) 39 stable stable trend -5.5 (-15.2, 5.2)
Vermont 6,10 11.8 (10.3, 13.5) 48 stable stable trend -3.8 (-15.7, 9.9)
South Dakota 6,10 10.7 (9.4, 12.2) 53 stable stable trend 4.1 (-12.8, 24.3)
Delaware 6,10 11.4 (10.2, 12.8) 66 stable stable trend 5.0 (-10.8, 23.7)
Montana 6,10 11.3 (10.1, 12.5) 73 stable stable trend -5.2 (-12.4, 2.7)
Rhode Island 6,10 11.1 (10.0, 12.3) 74 stable stable trend 3.5 (-12.4, 22.3)
Hawaii 3,8 9.7 (8.7, 10.7) 76 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
New Hampshire 6,10 11.1 (10.0, 12.2) 92 stable stable trend -2.3 (-16.3, 14.0)
Maine 6,10 10.6 (9.6, 11.6) 97 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Idaho 6,10 11.4 (10.4, 12.4) 100 stable stable trend -2.1 (-10.9, 7.6)
Nebraska 6,10 10.4 (9.5, 11.3) 111 stable stable trend 3.4 (-7.4, 15.5)
Utah 3,8 11.3 (10.5, 12.2) 137 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
New Mexico 3,8 11.5 (10.7, 12.4) 141 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
West Virginia 6,10 12.7 (11.8, 13.7) 155 stable stable trend -1.8 (-9.4, 6.5)
Mississippi 6,10 9.8 (9.2, 10.5) 171 stable stable trend 0.9 (-9.5, 12.4)
Arkansas 6,10 10.5 (9.9, 11.2) 187 stable stable trend 4.9 (-0.1, 10.1)
Kansas 6,10 11.8 (11.1, 12.6) 193 stable stable trend -3.4 (-10.6, 4.5)
Iowa 3,8 12.0 (11.3, 12.8) 231 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Louisiana 3,9 9.7 (9.2, 10.2) 256 stable stable trend -0.1 (-10.2, 11.2)
Oklahoma 6,10 11.9 (11.3, 12.6) 266 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.5, 9.1)
Kentucky 3,9 10.7 (10.2, 11.3) 281 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.6)
South Carolina 6,10 10.0 (9.4, 10.5) 286 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.5, 7.5)
Oregon 6,10 12.1 (11.5, 12.8) 286 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.5)
Connecticut 3,8 12.6 (12.0, 13.3) 288 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Colorado 6,10 11.5 (10.9, 12.1) 318 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.5)
Minnesota 6,10 11.0 (10.5, 11.5) 343 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.1)
Alabama 6,10 11.8 (11.2, 12.4) 351 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 3.3)
Missouri 6,10 10.4 (9.9, 10.9) 383 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.2)
Maryland 6,10 11.2 (10.7, 11.7) 388 stable stable trend -4.5 (-9.9, 1.3)
Wisconsin 6,10 12.3 (11.8, 12.9) 422 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.0, 5.2)
Arizona 6,10 11.3 (10.8, 11.8) 427 stable stable trend -4.6 (-10.6, 1.7)
Indiana 6,10 11.2 (10.7, 11.7) 431 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.1, 0.5)
Tennessee 6,10 11.6 (11.1, 12.1) 446 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.4, -2.9)
Washington 5,10 12.4 (11.9, 12.9) 483 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.7, -1.9)
Massachusetts 6,10 11.9 (11.4, 12.4) 494 stable stable trend -2.6 (-13.1, 9.2)
Virginia 6,10 11.4 (11.0, 11.9) 535 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.9, -1.1)
Georgia 3,9 11.7 (11.3, 12.1) 612 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.7, 3.3)
North Carolina 6,10 11.3 (10.9, 11.7) 650 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.0, 1.5)
New Jersey 3,8 12.6 (12.2, 13.0) 691 falling falling trend -6.0 (-11.6, -0.1)
Michigan 5,10 12.3 # (11.9, 12.7) 747 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.1, 1.2)
Ohio 6,10 11.8 (11.4, 12.1) 846 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.4, 2.6)
Illinois 6,10 11.9 (11.5, 12.2) 885 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.0)
Pennsylvania 6,10 12.5 (12.2, 12.9) 1,047 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.4)
Texas 6,10 11.0 (10.8, 11.3) 1,418 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Florida 6,10 11.4 (11.2, 11.7) 1,474 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
New York 6,10 12.7 (12.4, 13.0) 1,518 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.6)
California 3,9 11.9 (11.6, 12.1) 2,417 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.8)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/25/2016 11:55 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top