Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Ovary, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 11.4 (11.4, 11.5) 21,315 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 13.0 (12.1, 14.0) 159 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.4, 3.3)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 12.5 (12.0, 12.9) 695 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
New York 6,10 *** 12.4 (12.2, 12.7) 1,505 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 1.7)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 12.3 (12.0, 12.7) 1,040 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.3)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 12.3 (10.6, 14.3) 39 stable stable trend -3.7 (-19.7, 15.4)
Washington 5,10 *** 12.3 (11.8, 12.8) 487 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.0, 4.8)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 12.2 (11.7, 12.8) 427 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.0, 4.6)
Vermont 6,10 *** 12.2 (10.7, 13.9) 50 stable stable trend -2.7 (-15.4, 11.9)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 12.1 (11.4, 12.7) 281 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Michigan 5,10 *** 12.1 # (11.7, 12.5) 739 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.4)
Oregon 6,10 *** 12.0 (11.3, 12.6) 288 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 4.1)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 11.8 (11.2, 12.5) 266 stable stable trend -0.3 (-12.3, 13.4)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 11.8 (11.0, 12.7) 147 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Alaska 6,10 *** 11.8 (10.0, 13.7) 37 stable stable trend -4.6 (-21.0, 15.1)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 11.8 (10.2, 13.6) 40 stable stable trend 4.9 (-19.0, 35.8)
Iowa 3,8 *** 11.8 (11.1, 12.5) 227 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Alabama 6,10 *** 11.7 (11.1, 12.3) 351 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.7)
California 3,8 *** 11.7 (11.5, 11.9) 2,428 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Illinois 6,10 *** 11.6 (11.2, 11.9) 875 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.7)
Utah 3,8 *** 11.5 (10.7, 12.4) 143 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 11.5 (11.0, 11.9) 483 stable stable trend -0.4 (-10.4, 10.7)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 11.5 (10.4, 12.6) 97 stable stable trend 1.1 (-12.1, 16.3)
Georgia 3,8 *** 11.4 (11.0, 11.9) 615 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Idaho 6,10 *** 11.4 (10.4, 12.4) 102 stable stable trend -0.9 (-10.1, 9.3)
Kansas 6,10 *** 11.4 (10.6, 12.1) 188 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.3, 3.9)
Arizona 6,10 *** 11.4 (10.9, 11.9) 439 stable stable trend -3.3 (-10.6, 4.6)
Colorado 6,10 *** 11.4 (10.8, 11.9) 320 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.8, 4.2)
Ohio 6,10 *** 11.3 (10.9, 11.6) 822 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.2)
Florida 6,10 *** 11.3 (11.0, 11.5) 1,486 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.1, -2.9)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 11.2 (10.8, 11.7) 442 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.4)
Delaware 6,10 *** 11.1 (9.9, 12.4) 66 stable stable trend 5.1 (-15.0, 30.0)
Indiana 6,10 *** 11.1 (10.6, 11.6) 430 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.6, 4.0)
Texas 6,10 *** 11.0 (10.8, 11.3) 1,458 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Montana 6,10 *** 11.0 (9.8, 12.2) 71 stable stable trend -2.8 (-11.6, 6.8)
Virginia 6,10 *** 10.9 (10.5, 11.4) 523 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.1, -0.2)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 10.9 (10.5, 11.3) 640 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.5, 3.0)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 10.8 (10.3, 11.3) 341 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 2.1)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 10.8 (9.9, 11.7) 117 stable stable trend 3.7 (-6.4, 15.0)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 10.7 (9.4, 12.1) 54 stable stable trend 4.1 (-13.4, 25.2)
Maryland 6,10 *** 10.7 (10.2, 11.2) 379 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.9, 1.9)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 10.7 (10.0, 11.4) 191 stable stable trend 2.7 (-4.1, 10.1)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 10.6 (9.5, 11.8) 72 stable stable trend 3.1 (-16.0, 26.6)
Maine 6,10 *** 10.5 (9.6, 11.5) 98 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.1)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 10.4 (9.8, 10.9) 274 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Missouri 6,10 *** 10.3 (9.8, 10.8) 383 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 2.4)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 10.1 (9.6, 10.6) 295 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.6, 7.3)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 10.0 (8.6, 11.5) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-15.1, 16.3)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 9.7 (9.1, 10.4) 172 stable stable trend 4.1 (-2.1, 10.7)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 9.7 (8.7, 10.7) 77 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 9.7 (9.1, 10.2) 257 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.2)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 8.2 (7.6, 8.7) 187 stable stable trend 2.6 (-8.7, 15.3)
Nevada 6 ¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/24/2017 1:12 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top