Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Prostate, 2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 99.1 (98.6, 99.6) 183,524 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.0, -1.1)
Puerto Rico 2,10 *** 144.7 (139.7, 150.0) 3,159 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.2)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 127.2 (124.1, 130.4) 6,529 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.0, -1.8)
Mississippi 2,10 *** 126.7 (121.3, 132.3) 2,156 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.7, 3.0)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 125.6 (121.1, 130.1) 3,264 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.0, -3.3)
North Dakota 2,10 *** 125.0 (114.6, 136.1) 557 stable stable trend -4.2 (-15.6, 8.7)
Delaware 2,10 *** 124.5 (115.5, 133.9) 751 falling falling trend -6.8 (-11.1, -2.3)
New York 2,10 *** 121.9 (119.8, 124.0) 13,648 falling falling trend -6.1 (-11.3, -0.6)
Alabama 2,10 *** 118.7 (114.7, 122.9) 3,416 stable stable trend -5.6 (-12.3, 1.5)
Maryland 2,10 *** 118.3 (114.5, 122.1) 3,985 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.9, 1.2)
South Carolina 2,10 *** 116.3 (112.4, 120.3) 3,521 stable stable trend -5.2 (-12.9, 3.2)
Georgia 3,8 *** 115.2 (112.2, 118.2) 6,066 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.4, -4.2)
Arkansas 2,10 *** 115.0 (110.0, 120.1) 2,070 stable stable trend -4.7 (-13.4, 4.8)
South Dakota 2,10 *** 113.4 (104.2, 123.2) 593 stable stable trend -3.5 (-11.9, 5.6)
Utah 3,8 *** 113.2 (107.3, 119.4) 1,441 falling falling trend -8.5 (-10.8, -6.0)
North Carolina 2,10 *** 111.6 (108.8, 114.4) 6,517 stable stable trend -6.2 (-13.6, 1.9)
Minnesota 2,10 *** 111.1 (107.4, 114.9) 3,602 stable stable trend -6.4 (-16.3, 4.7)
Nebraska 2,10 *** 109.3 (103.0, 115.9) 1,183 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.9, 1.0)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 108.8 (104.4, 113.4) 2,380 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.3, -3.7)
Tennessee 2,10 *** 107.9 (104.5, 111.3) 4,245 stable stable trend -6.5 (-13.0, 0.6)
Montana 2,10 *** 107.8 (100.2, 116.0) 783 stable stable trend -4.8 (-13.1, 4.2)
Wisconsin 2,10 *** 107.1 (103.7, 110.6) 3,895 stable stable trend -5.3 (-12.4, 2.4)
Illinois 2,10 *** 106.8 (104.4, 109.3) 7,663 falling falling trend -5.9 (-11.2, -0.4)
Pennsylvania 2,10 *** 104.5 (102.3, 106.8) 8,583 stable stable trend -7.8 (-17.0, 2.5)
Iowa 3,8 *** 103.4 (98.8, 108.2) 1,976 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.6, -3.0)
District of Columbia 2,10 *** 103.2 (91.5, 116.0) 299 falling falling trend -15.2 (-21.2, -8.8)
Michigan 4,10 *** 102.8 # (100.2, 105.4) 6,305 falling falling trend -10.5 (-19.9, -0.1)
Kansas 2,10 *** 101.8 (96.8, 106.9) 1,677 falling falling trend -10.1 (-17.2, -2.5)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 99.2 (95.3, 103.3) 2,599 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.5)
Ohio 2,10 *** 99.2 (96.8, 101.6) 7,050 falling falling trend -6.9 (-13.2, -0.2)
Idaho 2,10 *** 98.7 (92.4, 105.4) 949 falling falling trend -9.7 (-15.9, -3.0)
New Hampshire 2,10 *** 98.7 (92.1, 105.6) 899 falling falling trend -9.6 (-16.7, -1.9)
Massachusetts 2,10 *** 98.5 (95.4, 101.7) 3,971 stable stable trend -8.2 (-17.1, 1.7)
Wyoming 2,10 *** 96.7 (86.6, 107.9) 354 stable stable trend -4.7 (-15.5, 7.5)
Virginia 2,10 *** 94.8 (92.0, 97.7) 4,508 stable stable trend -6.0 (-13.8, 2.6)
Rhode Island 2,10 *** 94.3 (86.7, 102.4) 600 falling falling trend -8.0 (-14.8, -0.6)
Oklahoma 2,10 *** 93.4 (89.4, 97.7) 2,072 stable stable trend -8.2 (-17.0, 1.5)
Washington 4,10 *** 91.7 (88.7, 94.8) 3,814 falling falling trend -9.2 (-14.0, -4.1)
Missouri 2,10 *** 90.6 (87.5, 93.8) 3,332 stable stable trend -6.9 (-14.1, 0.8)
Maine 2,10 *** 88.3 (82.4, 94.7) 860 stable stable trend -7.0 (-16.4, 3.4)
West Virginia 2,10 *** 88.1 (82.9, 93.6) 1,140 stable stable trend -6.9 (-14.1, 1.0)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 87.4 (81.1, 94.1) 761 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.9, -2.7)
California 3,8 *** 87.1 (85.8, 88.4) 17,655 falling falling trend -9.2 (-12.0, -6.2)
Texas 2,10 *** 86.5 (84.8, 88.1) 11,220 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.5, -2.6)
Oregon 2,10 *** 86.2 (82.6, 90.0) 2,220 stable stable trend -8.4 (-17.4, 1.6)
Indiana 2,10 *** 83.3 (80.3, 86.4) 3,109 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.7, -2.6)
Vermont 2,10 *** 82.5 (74.0, 91.8) 368 stable stable trend -10.4 (-21.3, 2.0)
Colorado 2,10 *** 81.6 (78.2, 85.0) 2,459 falling falling trend -9.9 (-13.1, -6.6)
Florida 2,10 *** 78.2 (76.8, 79.7) 10,874 falling falling trend -10.8 (-13.4, -8.1)
Arizona 2,10 *** 78.0 (75.3, 80.8) 3,239 stable stable trend -1.4 (-8.0, 5.6)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 72.6 (67.9, 77.6) 922 falling falling trend -9.2 (-11.4, -7.0)
Nevada 2 *** 69.5 (65.5, 73.7) 1,195
¶¶
¶¶
Alaska 2,10 *** 61.0 (52.4, 70.5) 228 falling falling trend -10.0 (-14.8, -4.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/18/2018 2:10 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics . State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top