Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 18.9 (18.8, 18.9) 66,509 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Rhode Island 6,10 *** 22.1 (20.9, 23.3) 279 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.0, 2.4)
Minnesota 6,10 *** 22.0 (21.5, 22.6) 1,331 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.9)
Vermont 6,10 *** 21.9 (20.5, 23.5) 173 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 2.1)
Iowa 3,8 *** 21.6 (21.0, 22.3) 800 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
New York 6,10 *** 21.6 (21.3, 21.9) 4,815 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
New Jersey 3,8 *** 21.6 (21.2, 22.0) 2,188 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Pennsylvania 6,10 *** 21.5 (21.2, 21.8) 3,435 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Connecticut 3,8 *** 21.1 (20.5, 21.8) 904 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
Wisconsin 6,10 *** 21.0 (20.5, 21.5) 1,407 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
New Hampshire 6,10 *** 20.8 (19.7, 21.8) 336 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.2)
Delaware 6,10 *** 20.7 (19.5, 21.9) 230 stable stable trend -0.6 (-8.0, 7.3)
Nebraska 6,10 *** 20.3 (19.4, 21.2) 423 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.3, 3.9)
Washington 5,10 *** 20.2 (19.7, 20.7) 1,540 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Maine 6,10 *** 20.2 (19.2, 21.2) 359 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.5)
Kentucky 3,8 *** 20.1 (19.5, 20.6) 1,009 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.3, 2.7)
Kansas 6,10 *** 20.0 (19.3, 20.7) 643 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.4, 2.4)
Michigan 5,10 *** 19.9 # (19.6, 20.3) 2,321 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Louisiana 3,8 *** 19.9 (19.3, 20.4) 984 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Illinois 6,10 *** 19.5 (19.2, 19.8) 2,735 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Massachusetts 6,10 *** 19.4 (19.0, 19.8) 1,516 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 3.6)
South Dakota 6,10 *** 19.2 (18.0, 20.5) 187 stable stable trend -4.4 (-12.5, 4.4)
North Dakota 6,10 *** 19.2 (17.8, 20.6) 157 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.7, 1.3)
Ohio 6,10 *** 19.0 (18.6, 19.3) 2,595 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Montana 6,10 *** 18.9 (17.9, 20.1) 239 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.3, 2.5)
Indiana 6,10 *** 18.9 (18.5, 19.4) 1,376 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Idaho 6,10 *** 18.8 (17.9, 19.8) 327 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.9, 8.8)
West Virginia 6,10 *** 18.7 (17.9, 19.5) 450 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.8)
Missouri 6,10 *** 18.6 (18.1, 19.1) 1,306 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
California 3,8 *** 18.5 (18.3, 18.7) 7,297 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Utah 3,8 *** 18.5 (17.7, 19.3) 445 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Oregon 6,10 *** 18.5 (17.9, 19.0) 867 stable stable trend -3.2 (-11.2, 5.5)
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 18.2 (17.6, 18.8) 778 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.8, 4.9)
Georgia 3,8 *** 18.1 (17.7, 18.5) 1,795 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Tennessee 6,10 *** 17.7 (17.2, 18.1) 1,315 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Texas 6,10 *** 17.6 (17.3, 17.8) 4,410 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
Florida 6,10 *** 17.4 (17.2, 17.7) 4,481 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Arkansas 6,10 *** 17.4 (16.8, 18.1) 599 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.0, 7.8)
North Carolina 6,10 *** 17.4 (17.0, 17.7) 1,908 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Colorado 6,10 *** 17.3 (16.8, 17.8) 934 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.9)
Hawaii 3,8 *** 17.3 (16.4, 18.3) 289 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.8, 0.4)
Maryland 6,10 *** 17.2 (16.7, 17.6) 1,116 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.8, 6.1)
Alaska 6,10 *** 17.1 (15.6, 18.8) 110 stable stable trend -1.7 (-14.0, 12.4)
Virginia 6,10 *** 17.0 (16.6, 17.4) 1,518 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 3.1)
Mississippi 6,10 *** 16.9 (16.3, 17.5) 552 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 2.7)
Wyoming 6,10 *** 16.8 (15.3, 18.3) 106 stable stable trend 2.5 (-7.4, 13.5)
South Carolina 6,10 *** 16.7 (16.2, 17.2) 919 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.8)
District of Columbia 6,10 *** 16.3 (14.9, 17.8) 102 stable stable trend -6.1 (-18.0, 7.5)
Alabama 6,10 *** 16.2 (15.8, 16.7) 906 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Arizona 6,10 *** 15.7 (15.3, 16.1) 1,186 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.4, 1.5)
New Mexico 3,8 *** 15.3 (14.6, 16.0) 365 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 14.7 (14.2, 15.2) 625 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.0, 7.6)
Nevada 6 ***
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/20/2019 5:32 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top