Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Stomach (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama 6 N/A 6.4 (6.1, 6.7) N/A 401 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 6.3 (6.3, 6.4) N/A 24,764 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.4)
Dallas County 6 Rural 12.4 (8.2, 18.2) 1 (1, 16) 6 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.7, 7.4)
Houston County 6 Urban 7.4 (5.5, 9.8) 6 (1, 27) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 6.3)
Baldwin County 6 Urban 6.8 (5.5, 8.3) 12 (2, 26) 22 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 6.3)
Elmore County 6 Urban 7.7 (5.5, 10.6) 3 (1, 28) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 6.3)
Limestone County 6 Urban 5.4 (3.6, 7.7) 26 (4, 31) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.7)
Lee County 6 Urban 5.1 (3.6, 6.9) 28 (9, 31) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.8)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 6.4 (4.7, 8.6) 17 (2, 29) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.4)
Marshall County 6 Rural 5.4 (3.6, 7.8) 25 (4, 31) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 5.9)
Autauga County 6 Urban 7.3 (4.7, 10.9) 8 (1, 31) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 6.4)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 7.5 (6.1, 9.2) 4 (2, 23) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.2)
Morgan County 6 Urban 6.4 (4.8, 8.6) 16 (2, 30) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.6, 4.6)
Mobile County 6 Urban 7.2 (6.2, 8.4) 10 (2, 21) 37 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 3.0)
Lauderdale County 6 Urban 6.1 (4.4, 8.5) 18 (2, 30) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 4.0)
Talladega County 6 Rural 8.3 (5.9, 11.3) 2 (1, 26) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.5, 5.3)
Shelby County 6 Urban 3.7 (2.7, 5.0) 31 (22, 31) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.4, 5.2)
Coffee County 6 Rural 6.7 (4.2, 10.2) 15 (1, 31) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.5, 4.1)
Etowah County 6 Urban 7.3 (5.4, 9.7) 9 (1, 28) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 3.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 5.5 (4.6, 6.6) 23 (10, 30) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.4)
Walker County 6 Urban 6.7 (4.4, 10.0) 14 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.2, 6.6)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 6.8 (6.0, 7.7) 13 (4, 23) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Cullman County 6 Rural 4.8 (3.1, 7.1) 29 (6, 31) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.3, 2.4)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 5.7 (3.9, 8.0) 22 (3, 31) 7 falling falling trend -9.0 (-25.9, -0.7)
Dale County 6 Rural 5.2 (3.0, 8.5) 27 (2, 31) 3 falling falling trend -13.8 (-29.7, -4.4)
Tuscaloosa County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.3, 7.3) 21 (5, 30) 13 falling falling trend -21.3 (-36.2, -4.6)
Blount County 6 Urban 4.5 (2.6, 7.3) 30 (7, 31) 4
*
*
Chilton County 6 Urban 5.8 (3.3, 9.6) 19 (2, 31) 3
*
*
Colbert County 6 Urban 5.4 (3.2, 8.6) 24 (2, 31) 4
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Rural 5.8 (3.7, 8.6) 20 (2, 31) 5
*
*
Escambia County 6 Rural 7.4 (4.2, 12.1) 5 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural 6.9 (3.9, 11.7) 11 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Tallapoosa County 6 Rural 7.3 (4.6, 11.3) 7 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Barbour County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chambers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Russell County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/10/2024 5:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top