Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 23.0 (22.2, 23.8) N/A 735 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 28.7 (28.6, 28.8) N/A 55,346 falling falling trend -0.8 (-2.8, -0.2)
Covington County 6 12.6 (7.2, 21.0) 42 (16, 42) 4 falling falling trend -10.1 (-33.0, -4.2)
DeKalb County 6 12.8 (8.5, 18.7) 41 (22, 42) 6 stable stable trend -15.2 (-45.8, 3.7)
Etowah County 6 14.9 (10.9, 20.0) 40 (18, 42) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.8)
Jackson County 6 15.2 (9.7, 23.0) 39 (9, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.3, 6.1)
Marshall County 6 15.6 (11.2, 21.1) 38 (14, 42) 9 falling falling trend -18.8 (-52.9, -5.0)
Lawrence County 6 15.7 (9.7, 24.9) 37 (7, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.7)
Coffee County 6 16.8 (10.9, 24.9) 36 (5, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.5, 3.8)
Geneva County 6 17.1 (10.0, 28.3) 35 (3, 42) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.9, 6.8)
Tallapoosa County 6 17.5 (11.8, 25.6) 34 (6, 42) 6 falling falling trend -7.6 (-24.4, -3.7)
Dallas County 6 18.5 (11.6, 28.1) 33 (3, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.2, 4.1)
Chilton County 6 18.5 (11.8, 27.8) 32 (3, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.5, 4.5)
Russell County 6 18.6 (12.6, 26.6) 31 (4, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.6, 6.2)
Houston County 6 18.8 (14.4, 24.1) 30 (9, 41) 14 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.5, -3.2)
Blount County 6 18.8 (13.1, 26.4) 29 (5, 42) 7
*
*
Walker County 6 19.0 (13.6, 26.0) 28 (6, 42) 9 rising rising trend 30.5 (10.8, 52.7)
Lee County 6 19.4 (15.4, 24.2) 27 (8, 40) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 0.9)
Escambia County 6 19.4 (12.0, 30.0) 26 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.7, 7.2)
Chambers County 6 20.1 (12.6, 30.9) 25 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Elmore County 6 20.4 (15.2, 26.8) 24 (5, 41) 11 rising rising trend 22.5 (3.6, 46.5)
Mobile County 6 20.4 (18.0, 23.1) 23 (10, 34) 56 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Dale County 6 20.7 (13.9, 29.7) 22 (2, 42) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.7, 5.6)
Autauga County 6 20.8 (14.7, 28.7) 21 (3, 42) 8 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.5, 1.3)
Macon County 6 21.6 (11.8, 37.7) 20 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Tuscaloosa County 6 21.8 (18.1, 26.1) 19 (5, 36) 25 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 0.9)
Montgomery County 6 21.8 (18.5, 25.7) 18 (6, 34) 32 falling falling trend -4.6 (-9.6, -2.7)
Morgan County 6 22.3 (17.7, 27.7) 17 (4, 37) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.8)
Cullman County 6 22.5 (17.2, 29.0) 16 (3, 38) 13 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.5, 8.1)
Calhoun County 6 22.8 (18.2, 28.2) 15 (4, 36) 19 stable stable trend 16.7 (-3.5, 34.3)
Limestone County 6 22.8 (17.5, 29.3) 14 (2, 38) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 1.1)
Colbert County 6 23.0 (16.6, 31.2) 13 (1, 40) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 6.7)
Pike County 6 23.6 (14.3, 36.7) 12 (1, 42) 4 falling falling trend -5.9 (-21.5, -1.1)
Baldwin County 6 23.8 (20.2, 27.8) 11 (4, 30) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.4)
Talladega County 6 24.1 (18.3, 31.1) 10 (1, 37) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.6)
Randolph County 6 24.6 (13.7, 40.9) 9 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Barbour County 6 25.7 (15.7, 40.5) 8 (1, 41) 4
*
*
St. Clair County 6 26.5 (20.8, 33.5) 7 (1, 30) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.2)
Lauderdale County 6 27.1 (21.3, 34.1) 6 (1, 30) 17 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 4.1)
Marion County 6 27.3 (16.7, 42.1) 5 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.9, 4.9)
Franklin County 6 28.0 (18.3, 41.3) 4 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-24.0, 7.2)
Madison County 6 30.6 (27.4, 34.2) 3 (1, 10) 70 stable stable trend -0.4 (-7.5, 6.2)
Jefferson County 6 31.5 (29.0, 34.1) 2 (1, 8) 130 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Shelby County 6 31.7 (27.5, 36.4) 1 (1, 11) 43 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.5)
Bibb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 2:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top