Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Colon & Rectum (Late Stage^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Percent of Cases with Late Stage
 sort by percent late descending
Alabama 6 N/A 64.5 (62.8, 66.1) N/A 1,186 54.1
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 64.2 (64.0, 64.4) N/A 72,697 59.1
Lamar County 6 Rural 48.7 (27.6, 80.1) 63 (6, 65) 3 44.4
Perry County 6 Rural 80.8 (46.0, 132.8) 11 (1, 65) 3 53.3
Sumter County 6 Rural 75.2 (43.2, 121.8) 16 (1, 65) 3 48.6
Choctaw County 6 Rural 60.7 (35.3, 96.9) 47 (2, 65) 4 46.2
Conecuh County 6 Rural 68.9 (40.8, 109.1) 29 (1, 65) 4 50.0
Greene County 6 Urban 110.6 (65.1, 175.4) 2 (1, 63) 4 63.3
Wilcox County 6 Rural 82.2 (48.8, 130.1) 8 (1, 65) 4 61.3
Lowndes County 6 Urban 95.4 (58.6, 146.9) 3 (1, 64) 4 65.6
Barbour County 6 Rural 43.8 (27.2, 66.7) 64 (17, 65) 4 44.9
Geneva County 6 Urban 40.9 (25.4, 62.3) 65 (24, 65) 4 48.9
Henry County 6 Urban 58.7 (36.2, 89.7) 50 (3, 65) 4 55.0
Washington County 6 Rural 67.7 (42.0, 103.3) 31 (1, 65) 4 47.8
Clay County 6 Rural 76.7 (48.9, 114.6) 14 (1, 65) 5 63.2
Cleburne County 6 Rural 74.6 (47.5, 111.7) 18 (1, 65) 5 49.0
Hale County 6 Urban 80.2 (50.8, 120.5) 12 (1, 65) 5 54.5
Crenshaw County 6 Rural 84.4 (54.2, 126.0) 6 (1, 64) 5 52.1
Butler County 6 Rural 70.3 (46.4, 102.2) 23 (1, 65) 6 50.9
Macon County 6 Urban 68.4 (44.9, 100.1) 30 (2, 65) 6 50.0
Monroe County 6 Rural 62.1 (41.0, 90.3) 43 (3, 65) 6 39.4
Bibb County 6 Urban 69.2 (46.1, 99.7) 27 (2, 65) 6 54.7
Fayette County 6 Rural 88.6 (58.6, 128.0) 5 (1, 63) 6 53.7
Cherokee County 6 Rural 50.8 (33.9, 73.1) 60 (12, 65) 6 53.6
Marengo County 6 Rural 80.8 (54.9, 114.6) 10 (1, 64) 6 53.3
Randolph County 6 Rural 66.0 (45.2, 93.3) 34 (2, 65) 7 54.1
Winston County 6 Rural 63.2 (43.2, 89.1) 39 (3, 65) 7 51.6
Pike County 6 Rural 69.5 (47.7, 97.5) 25 (2, 65) 7 43.6
Marion County 6 Rural 56.5 (39.4, 78.4) 55 (8, 65) 7 44.4
Franklin County 6 Rural 62.6 (44.2, 86.3) 41 (4, 65) 8 43.2
Pickens County 6 Urban 92.8 (65.4, 127.9) 4 (1, 59) 8 54.3
Covington County 6 Rural 51.9 (37.3, 70.2) 59 (15, 65) 9 41.7
Coffee County 6 Rural 50.1 (36.7, 66.9) 61 (19, 65) 9 48.5
Escambia County 6 Rural 67.4 (49.5, 89.7) 32 (3, 64) 10 53.3
Lawrence County 6 Urban 71.8 (53.3, 94.9) 22 (3, 63) 10 56.0
Dale County 6 Rural 58.8 (43.7, 77.4) 49 (9, 65) 10 49.5
Chambers County 6 Rural 72.6 (54.3, 95.2) 21 (2, 61) 11 58.1
Clarke County 6 Rural 110.9 (83.2, 144.9) 1 (1, 28) 11 50.5
Dallas County 6 Rural 73.0 (55.0, 95.0) 20 (2, 62) 12 48.7
Russell County 6 Urban 61.8 (47.0, 79.9) 44 (7, 65) 12 55.0
Colbert County 6 Urban 53.7 (41.0, 69.0) 56 (16, 65) 12 43.4
Autauga County 6 Urban 63.1 (48.4, 80.7) 40 (7, 64) 13 50.0
Tallapoosa County 6 Rural 69.8 (53.4, 89.7) 24 (3, 63) 13 53.8
Chilton County 6 Urban 82.9 (64.1, 105.6) 7 (1, 54) 14 64.8
DeKalb County 6 Rural 52.4 (40.9, 66.2) 57 (21, 65) 15 42.4
Blount County 6 Urban 65.1 (51.0, 82.0) 35 (7, 63) 15 60.7
Elmore County 6 Urban 57.2 (45.7, 70.9) 53 (15, 65) 17 49.7
Jackson County 6 Rural 81.0 (64.9, 99.9) 9 (2, 50) 18 58.0
Marshall County 6 Rural 56.7 (45.9, 69.2) 54 (18, 64) 20 46.7
Houston County 6 Urban 49.8 (40.5, 60.8) 62 (31, 65) 20 47.0
Walker County 6 Urban 75.6 (61.4, 92.2) 15 (3, 54) 20 54.0
Talladega County 6 Rural 66.7 (54.2, 81.1) 33 (7, 61) 21 50.7
Limestone County 6 Urban 63.2 (51.9, 76.2) 38 (11, 62) 23 57.4
St. Clair County 6 Urban 69.3 (57.1, 83.4) 26 (6, 59) 23 56.3
Cullman County 6 Rural 69.1 (57.1, 83.0) 28 (6, 57) 24 56.5
Lauderdale County 6 Urban 61.7 (50.9, 74.0) 46 (13, 62) 24 51.7
Lee County 6 Urban 51.9 (43.0, 62.1) 58 (29, 65) 25 60.7
Etowah County 6 Urban 63.9 (53.4, 75.9) 37 (11, 61) 27 50.0
Calhoun County 6 Urban 74.7 (63.4, 87.4) 17 (4, 49) 32 53.6
Morgan County 6 Urban 73.5 (62.7, 85.5) 19 (5, 52) 34 56.5
Tuscaloosa County 6 Urban 61.7 (53.3, 71.0) 45 (16, 60) 41 60.5
Shelby County 6 Urban 57.8 (50.3, 66.2) 51 (22, 62) 44 62.4
Montgomery County 6 Urban 64.3 (56.3, 73.0) 36 (14, 56) 49 48.0
Baldwin County 6 Urban 57.4 (50.7, 64.8) 52 (25, 62) 55 51.9
Madison County 6 Urban 62.2 (56.3, 68.7) 42 (20, 56) 83 59.9
Mobile County 6 Urban 79.1 (72.7, 85.9) 13 (5, 28) 116 59.5
Jefferson County 6 Urban 60.3 (55.9, 65.1) 48 (26, 56) 141 57.7
Bullock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Coosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 7:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.

^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top