Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 N/A 483.4 (479.7, 487.1) N/A 14,204 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Lee County 6 Urban 378.6 (358.8, 399.2) 67 (64, 67) 299 falling falling trend -6.8 (-12.3, -1.0)
Coosa County 6 Rural 408.0 (344.8, 481.3) 66 (20, 67) 35 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.0)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 412.8 (385.4, 441.8) 65 (51, 67) 181 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.9, 1.7)
Russell County 6 Urban 415.1 (381.9, 450.4) 64 (46, 67) 127 falling falling trend -4.5 (-17.3, -2.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 417.6 (405.0, 430.5) 63 (56, 66) 886 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Shelby County 6 Urban 421.5 (405.0, 438.5) 62 (52, 66) 522 falling falling trend -8.9 (-12.3, -6.7)
Cullman County 6 Rural 432.3 (407.3, 458.6) 61 (44, 66) 238 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Blount County 6 Urban 434.1 (403.9, 466.0) 60 (40, 66) 163 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Lauderdale County 6 Urban 441.0 (416.6, 466.6) 59 (40, 66) 263 stable stable trend -2.1 (-10.1, 0.3)
Fayette County 6 Rural 441.2 (385.9, 502.9) 58 (13, 67) 50 falling falling trend -8.9 (-14.2, -2.1)
Escambia County 6 Rural 445.9 (406.9, 487.8) 57 (24, 66) 101 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Tuscaloosa County 6 Urban 446.4 (427.9, 465.5) 56 (40, 64) 482 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -2.4)
Covington County 6 Rural 449.5 (412.1, 489.7) 55 (23, 66) 115 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.6, -0.6)
Jackson County 6 Rural 455.3 (423.6, 489.0) 54 (25, 66) 166 falling falling trend -2.1 (-7.8, -0.8)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 460.4 (416.5, 508.3) 53 (14, 66) 91 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Dallas County 6 Rural 462.7 (422.8, 505.6) 52 (17, 66) 111 falling falling trend -4.8 (-15.8, -1.4)
Limestone County 6 Urban 463.0 (437.8, 489.3) 51 (28, 62) 273 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Marshall County 6 Rural 467.6 (442.1, 494.3) 50 (25, 61) 267 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Coffee County 6 Rural 468.5 (434.1, 504.9) 49 (18, 64) 145 falling falling trend -2.1 (-8.2, -0.7)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 468.8 (408.9, 536.6) 48 (5, 67) 47 falling falling trend -5.3 (-11.9, -2.5)
Dale County 6 Rural 475.4 (439.8, 513.4) 47 (13, 63) 140 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Monroe County 6 Rural 480.4 (427.5, 538.6) 46 (7, 66) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Marion County 6 Rural 481.3 (439.3, 526.6) 45 (9, 64) 101 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Marengo County 6 Rural 483.5 (427.6, 545.1) 44 (5, 66) 60 falling falling trend -2.7 (-9.4, -1.0)
Lamar County 6 Rural 484.3 (421.8, 554.2) 43 (4, 66) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Geneva County 6 Urban 484.7 (438.8, 534.5) 42 (7, 64) 88 falling falling trend -8.3 (-13.8, -3.4)
Chilton County 6 Urban 485.3 (447.6, 525.4) 41 (9, 61) 131 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Baldwin County 6 Urban 486.8 (471.1, 503.0) 40 (22, 51) 775 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Perry County 6 Rural 487.9 (403.2, 586.2) 39 (1, 67) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 1.9)
Houston County 6 Urban 488.2 (463.5, 513.9) 38 (16, 55) 312 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Etowah County 6 Urban 489.2 (464.6, 514.8) 37 (16, 55) 322 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Randolph County 6 Rural 489.8 (439.3, 545.0) 36 (5, 65) 76 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.2, 0.1)
Mobile County 6 Urban 490.2 (477.1, 503.6) 35 (23, 49) 1,147 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 2.6)
Franklin County 6 Rural 493.5 (448.7, 541.7) 34 (7, 63) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Pickens County 6 Urban 495.0 (441.1, 554.3) 33 (4, 65) 65 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 497.0 (486.4, 507.7) 32 (21, 45) 1,817 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Bullock County 6 Rural 501.0 (421.3, 591.6) 31 (2, 66) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.3, 0.7)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 503.5 (476.2, 532.0) 30 (10, 51) 274 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Winston County 6 Rural 507.2 (457.8, 561.0) 29 (4, 60) 85 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Colbert County 6 Urban 507.4 (474.4, 542.4) 28 (7, 53) 186 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.9, -0.2)
Talladega County 6 Rural 507.8 (479.3, 537.7) 27 (8, 49) 257 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.9)
Chambers County 6 Rural 508.7 (466.6, 554.0) 26 (4, 57) 117 falling falling trend -2.0 (-8.1, -0.8)
Clay County 6 Rural 509.0 (446.3, 578.9) 25 (2, 64) 51 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 510.2 (447.6, 579.7) 24 (2, 65) 53 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 514.3 (495.6, 533.6) 23 (10, 41) 605 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Autauga County 6 Urban 516.0 (481.0, 552.9) 22 (5, 51) 170 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.9)
Macon County 6 Urban 516.8 (457.4, 582.5) 21 (2, 63) 62 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Cleburne County 6 Rural 519.3 (455.6, 590.0) 20 (2, 63) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 2.0)
Tallapoosa County 6 Rural 522.0 (485.1, 561.4) 19 (4, 48) 165 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 522.7 (479.0, 569.6) 18 (3, 54) 114 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Bibb County 6 Urban 526.4 (473.0, 584.5) 17 (2, 57) 74 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Pike County 6 Rural 526.8 (476.4, 581.2) 16 (2, 55) 86 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Morgan County 6 Urban 528.2 (504.4, 552.9) 15 (6, 37) 391 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Walker County 6 Urban 534.6 (502.7, 568.1) 14 (3, 42) 227 falling falling trend -2.4 (-10.3, -0.1)
Butler County 6 Rural 535.4 (475.4, 601.3) 13 (2, 57) 63 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Greene County 6 Urban 536.0 (446.4, 640.0) 12 (1, 66) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.2)
Hale County 6 Urban 539.3 (471.7, 614.6) 11 (1, 59) 52 stable stable trend 5.8 (-1.5, 17.8)
Barbour County 6 Rural 540.7 (490.8, 594.8) 10 (2, 49) 91 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Henry County 6 Urban 546.5 (487.6, 611.4) 9 (1, 54) 69 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Sumter County 6 Rural 548.8 (465.9, 642.8) 8 (1, 64) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-8.2, 0.6)
Clarke County 6 Rural 551.6 (498.7, 609.1) 7 (1, 48) 85 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Conecuh County 6 Rural 559.9 (487.6, 641.2) 6 (1, 58) 48 rising rising trend 15.6 (4.4, 23.9)
Elmore County 6 Urban 570.7 (539.9, 602.9) 5 (2, 21) 281 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 574.9 (548.5, 602.2) 4 (1, 16) 389 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.5, 7.4)
Wilcox County 6 Rural 595.6 (510.6, 691.5) 3 (1, 48) 40 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Crenshaw County 6 Rural 619.6 (543.3, 704.2) 2 (1, 33) 53 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.5)
Lowndes County 6 Urban 670.4 (580.7, 771.0) 1 (1, 18) 44 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/02/2024 11:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top