Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 398.8 (395.6, 402.0) N/A 12,914 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 416.4 (416.0, 416.8) N/A 835,074 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.1)
Lee County 6 320.5 (303.3, 338.4) 67 (58, 67) 272 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.0)
DeKalb County 6 338.2 (314.2, 363.7) 66 (46, 67) 157 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Hale County 6 341.0 (291.1, 397.7) 65 (16, 67) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.2)
Winston County 6 341.8 (302.4, 385.5) 64 (25, 67) 63 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Russell County 6 342.0 (314.8, 371.1) 63 (41, 67) 123 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.7)
Choctaw County 6 343.9 (289.9, 405.9) 62 (14, 67) 35 falling falling trend -12.5 (-19.0, -5.3)
Cleburne County 6 348.3 (297.3, 406.1) 61 (11, 67) 37 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.5)
Cherokee County 6 353.2 (313.4, 397.1) 60 (18, 67) 68 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Geneva County 6 355.0 (316.0, 397.8) 59 (19, 67) 68 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Conecuh County 6 360.6 (305.2, 424.1) 58 (6, 67) 35 stable stable trend -3.4 (-20.5, 1.7)
Chilton County 6 360.6 (328.7, 395.0) 57 (24, 67) 101 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Marion County 6 361.7 (325.1, 401.7) 56 (18, 67) 81 stable stable trend -6.7 (-15.5, 0.9)
Escambia County 6 363.1 (329.0, 400.1) 55 (19, 67) 91 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Henry County 6 365.1 (317.2, 418.8) 54 (9, 67) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Shelby County 6 370.6 (355.8, 385.9) 53 (35, 61) 498 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.1, 5.9)
Tuscaloosa County 6 374.5 (358.5, 391.0) 52 (31, 60) 438 falling falling trend -1.2 (-4.3, -0.4)
Perry County 6 374.6 (308.3, 452.1) 51 (3, 67) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Covington County 6 375.6 (342.2, 411.6) 50 (13, 66) 107 stable stable trend -7.4 (-18.1, 1.1)
Macon County 6 376.0 (326.8, 431.0) 49 (6, 67) 50 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.4)
Monroe County 6 377.7 (332.7, 427.6) 48 (7, 67) 58 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Coosa County 6 378.3 (315.4, 451.5) 47 (3, 67) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.9)
Coffee County 6 379.6 (350.0, 411.2) 46 (16, 64) 129 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
Franklin County 6 385.1 (346.4, 427.1) 45 (8, 65) 77 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Washington County 6 386.0 (333.8, 444.5) 44 (4, 67) 44 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
Houston County 6 386.3 (365.5, 407.9) 43 (19, 59) 280 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Mobile County 6 387.6 (376.8, 398.6) 42 (26, 53) 1,049 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.4)
Marengo County 6 388.3 (340.2, 441.6) 41 (5, 66) 53 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Dale County 6 390.4 (359.2, 423.8) 40 (10, 62) 124 stable stable trend -3.7 (-9.5, 1.2)
Barbour County 6 391.8 (348.2, 439.9) 39 (6, 65) 67 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Blount County 6 392.4 (364.0, 422.6) 38 (11, 61) 154 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.3)
Randolph County 6 392.5 (348.6, 440.8) 37 (5, 66) 66 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Jefferson County 6 394.2 (385.5, 402.9) 36 (25, 48) 1,707 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Lauderdale County 6 396.7 (373.9, 420.5) 35 (13, 56) 261 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.2)
Bibb County 6 399.4 (351.8, 452.1) 34 (3, 65) 55 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.6)
Chambers County 6 400.0 (363.0, 440.0) 33 (6, 61) 97 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 0.3)
Marshall County 6 400.1 (377.2, 424.0) 32 (11, 55) 249 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Colbert County 6 401.0 (372.2, 431.5) 31 (8, 58) 162 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Baldwin County 6 404.9 (390.2, 420.1) 30 (14, 47) 639 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Limestone County 6 405.8 (382.8, 429.9) 29 (9, 53) 244 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Cullman County 6 405.8 (381.6, 431.3) 28 (9, 53) 230 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
St. Clair County 6 406.8 (383.2, 431.5) 27 (9, 52) 237 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.6, -1.4)
Sumter County 6 407.0 (342.7, 480.3) 26 (1, 67) 34 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.7)
Fayette County 6 407.4 (355.6, 465.3) 25 (2, 66) 51 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.2)
Pike County 6 408.2 (368.0, 451.9) 24 (4, 61) 81 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Montgomery County 6 409.8 (394.7, 425.3) 23 (11, 45) 591 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Butler County 6 410.0 (361.8, 463.3) 22 (3, 64) 60 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.4)
Wilcox County 6 411.3 (346.7, 485.4) 21 (1, 67) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.5)
Clarke County 6 415.0 (371.2, 462.9) 20 (3, 61) 73 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Jackson County 6 418.2 (387.8, 450.6) 19 (4, 52) 158 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.7)
Greene County 6 419.1 (343.3, 507.8) 18 (1, 67) 27 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.2)
Etowah County 6 422.4 (400.6, 445.1) 17 (6, 43) 309 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.2)
Dallas County 6 423.7 (387.6, 462.4) 16 (3, 53) 114 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Madison County 6 425.2 (413.0, 437.6) 15 (7, 30) 980 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.4)
Talladega County 6 429.9 (404.4, 456.6) 14 (4, 41) 233 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Morgan County 6 430.9 (409.9, 452.8) 13 (5, 34) 343 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Autauga County 6 432.3 (401.6, 464.9) 12 (3, 44) 153 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.5)
Calhoun County 6 432.8 (411.4, 455.1) 11 (5, 33) 337 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.6)
Elmore County 6 437.1 (411.4, 464.0) 10 (3, 35) 227 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.7)
Lawrence County 6 454.0 (413.8, 497.2) 9 (1, 39) 105 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Bullock County 6 458.1 (380.4, 547.8) 8 (1, 63) 28 falling falling trend -12.4 (-18.0, -8.2)
Tallapoosa County 6 458.4 (421.3, 498.1) 7 (1, 31) 133 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Clay County 6 459.5 (396.4, 530.5) 6 (1, 54) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Lamar County 6 460.6 (399.9, 528.7) 5 (1, 53) 48 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.4)
Lowndes County 6 471.8 (397.2, 556.9) 4 (1, 56) 33 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.7, 3.8)
Walker County 6 485.6 (455.6, 517.2) 3 (1, 12) 220 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.1)
Crenshaw County 6 490.7 (427.1, 561.8) 2 (1, 38) 48 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.5, 13.6)
Pickens County 6 508.2 (452.8, 568.9) 1 (1, 21) 69 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.4, 5.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/20/2024 5:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top