Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama 6 | 110.1 (108.4, 111.9) | N/A | 3,196 |
rising 
|
0.6 (0.3, 0.9) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 106.5 (106.3, 106.7) | N/A | 208,914 |
falling 
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.2) |
| Barbour County 6 | 77.9 (59.2, 100.7) | 67 (38, 67) | 12 |
stable 
|
-1.6 (-3.9, 0.6) |
| Hale County 6 | 83.5 (57.0, 117.7) | 66 (9, 67) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-4.7, 2.4) |
| Lee County 6 | 90.4 (82.0, 99.4) | 65 (47, 67) | 87 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.4, 1.5) |
| Escambia County 6 | 91.0 (74.2, 110.4) | 64 (25, 67) | 21 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.1, 0.8) |
| Pike County 6 | 93.5 (73.5, 117.0) | 63 (17, 67) | 16 |
stable
|
0.1 (-2.3, 2.5) |
| Cleburne County 6 | 94.0 (67.3, 127.8) | 62 (6, 67) | 8 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.1, 3.7) |
| Russell County 6 | 96.9 (82.8, 112.7) | 61 (24, 67) | 34 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.2, 1.5) |
| Tuscaloosa County 6 | 96.8 (89.0, 105.0) | 60 (38, 66) | 117 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.2, 0.7) |
| Blount County 6 | 97.4 (83.2, 113.3) | 59 (21, 67) | 34 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.1, 2.0) |
| DeKalb County 6 | 98.3 (85.5, 112.5) | 58 (22, 67) | 42 |
stable
|
-8.1 (-23.6, 10.6) |
| Chilton County 6 | 100.3 (83.9, 119.0) | 57 (16, 67) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.6, 1.2) |
| Henry County 6 | 103.3 (76.8, 136.0) | 56 (4, 67) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.3, 1.7) |
| Montgomery County 6 | 102.7 (95.2, 110.7) | 55 (31, 63) | 138 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.5, 1.1) |
| Houston County 6 | 103.7 (92.6, 115.6) | 54 (23, 65) | 65 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.6, 1.0) |
| Washington County 6 | 104.2 (77.1, 137.7) | 53 (3, 67) | 10 |
stable
|
1.4 (-1.1, 4.0) |
| Covington County 6 | 104.7 (85.8, 126.5) | 52 (10, 67) | 22 |
stable
|
2.5 (-0.9, 6.0) |
| Shelby County 6 | 103.6 (96.2, 111.5) | 51 (27, 62) | 145 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.5, 1.2) |
| Mobile County 6 | 105.0 (99.2, 111.0) | 50 (29, 60) | 253 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.8, 0.6) |
| Geneva County 6 | 106.2 (84.1, 132.4) | 49 (6, 67) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.9, 1.7) |
| Baldwin County 6 | 105.6 (97.6, 114.0) | 48 (24, 62) | 130 |
rising
|
1.0 (0.3, 1.6) |
| Choctaw County 6 | 106.6 (74.9, 147.2) | 47 (2, 67) | 7 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.9, 4.9) |
| Macon County 6 | 104.7 (76.4, 139.8) | 46 (2, 67) | 9 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.4, 3.7) |
| Winston County 6 | 107.1 (83.4, 135.3) | 45 (5, 67) | 14 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.7, 3.0) |
| Jefferson County 6 | 106.6 (102.0, 111.2) | 44 (30, 56) | 424 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.6, 0.5) |
| Franklin County 6 | 106.5 (86.7, 129.3) | 43 (7, 67) | 20 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.9, 3.5) |
| Dale County 6 | 106.7 (90.4, 125.1) | 42 (9, 66) | 31 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.8, 3.6) |
| Coffee County 6 | 108.4 (92.8, 125.8) | 41 (10, 65) | 35 |
rising
|
1.9 (0.4, 3.4) |
| Monroe County 6 | 106.0 (81.3, 135.8) | 40 (3, 67) | 13 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.4, 4.1) |
| Marion County 6 | 110.3 (89.3, 134.7) | 39 (5, 67) | 20 |
stable
|
-13.7 (-27.5, 2.6) |
| Colbert County 6 | 111.1 (95.1, 128.9) | 38 (8, 64) | 35 |
rising
|
1.8 (0.1, 3.5) |
| Cherokee County 6 | 113.1 (89.7, 140.8) | 37 (4, 67) | 16 |
stable
|
1.2 (-2.2, 4.8) |
| Madison County 6 | 113.3 (107.0, 119.9) | 36 (19, 51) | 246 |
rising
|
1.2 (0.3, 2.1) |
| Randolph County 6 | 113.8 (89.0, 143.3) | 35 (3, 67) | 15 |
stable
|
1.2 (-1.2, 3.7) |
| St. Clair County 6 | 113.4 (101.2, 126.7) | 34 (10, 59) | 63 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.4, 2.9) |
| Limestone County 6 | 115.2 (103.5, 127.9) | 33 (10, 58) | 71 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.2, 1.9) |
| Etowah County 6 | 114.7 (103.0, 127.4) | 32 (10, 59) | 71 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.7, 2.1) |
| Bibb County 6 | 116.3 (92.7, 144.0) | 31 (3, 66) | 17 |
stable
|
2.1 (0.0, 4.3) |
| Morgan County 6 | 117.0 (106.0, 128.9) | 30 (10, 55) | 83 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.3) |
| Marshall County 6 | 117.9 (105.5, 131.4) | 29 (7, 56) | 66 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.8, 1.9) |
| Butler County 6 | 118.9 (91.9, 151.2) | 28 (1, 66) | 13 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.3, 2.9) |
| Lauderdale County 6 | 119.7 (106.7, 134.0) | 27 (6, 54) | 62 |
rising
|
1.8 (0.6, 3.1) |
| Bullock County 6 | 122.1 (86.3, 167.7) | 26 (1, 67) | 8 |
stable
|
1.2 (-2.8, 5.3) |
| Calhoun County 6 | 121.0 (109.4, 133.4) | 25 (6, 49) | 81 |
rising
|
7.6 (0.8, 14.9) |
| Clarke County 6 | 122.8 (98.0, 152.0) | 24 (2, 65) | 17 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.4, 2.3) |
| Clay County 6 | 122.9 (89.5, 164.6) | 23 (1, 67) | 9 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.7, 3.2) |
| Lawrence County 6 | 124.6 (103.2, 149.0) | 22 (2, 63) | 24 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.6, 2.6) |
| Cullman County 6 | 123.4 (109.8, 138.3) | 21 (5, 51) | 60 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.1, 3.6) |
| Autauga County 6 | 124.6 (108.6, 142.3) | 20 (3, 56) | 44 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.9, 1.5) |
| Jackson County 6 | 125.6 (108.3, 144.8) | 19 (3, 56) | 38 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.4, 3.3) |
| Greene County 6 | 125.8 (81.1, 185.2) | 18 (1, 67) | 5 |
stable
|
2.1 (-1.4, 5.7) |
| Marengo County 6 | 126.2 (97.7, 160.4) | 17 (1, 66) | 13 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.4, 4.5) |
| Wilcox County 6 | 126.3 (88.2, 174.7) | 16 (1, 67) | 7 |
stable
|
-2.0 (-5.1, 1.2) |
| Conecuh County 6 | 127.5 (91.3, 173.0) | 15 (1, 67) | 8 |
stable
|
1.4 (-2.3, 5.3) |
| Fayette County 6 | 129.6 (98.9, 166.7) | 14 (1, 65) | 12 |
stable
|
3.1 (-0.3, 6.6) |
| Sumter County 6 | 129.7 (91.1, 178.4) | 13 (1, 67) | 8 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.4, 5.9) |
| Talladega County 6 | 130.5 (116.4, 145.8) | 12 (2, 42) | 63 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.2, 3.1) |
| Tallapoosa County 6 | 129.1 (108.4, 152.6) | 11 (1, 56) | 28 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.2, 3.4) |
| Chambers County 6 | 129.9 (108.0, 154.9) | 10 (1, 57) | 25 |
rising
|
2.0 (0.5, 3.4) |
| Walker County 6 | 131.9 (115.8, 149.6) | 9 (2, 47) | 49 |
rising
|
1.8 (0.5, 3.0) |
| Dallas County 6 | 134.1 (112.6, 158.3) | 8 (1, 52) | 28 |
rising
|
2.5 (0.7, 4.3) |
| Elmore County 6 | 135.1 (121.2, 150.2) | 7 (2, 35) | 70 |
rising
|
1.7 (0.1, 3.3) |
| Lamar County 6 | 143.2 (107.7, 186.7) | 6 (1, 63) | 11 |
stable
|
1.5 (-0.5, 3.5) |
| Pickens County 6 | 141.8 (112.4, 176.4) | 5 (1, 57) | 16 |
stable
|
2.2 (-1.2, 5.7) |
| Perry County 6 | 140.1 (95.8, 196.9) | 4 (1, 66) | 7 |
stable
|
3.0 (-1.6, 7.7) |
| Coosa County 6 | 150.5 (109.5, 202.2) | 3 (1, 63) | 9 |
stable
|
3.6 (-0.9, 8.4) |
| Crenshaw County 6 | 149.0 (112.7, 193.1) | 2 (1, 59) | 11 |
rising
|
3.9 (1.4, 6.5) |
| Lowndes County 6 | 173.6 (126.7, 231.6) | 1 (1, 54) | 9 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.8, 5.0) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/31/2023 12:28 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/31/2023 12:28 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.