Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 41.1 (40.4, 41.9) N/A 2,487 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 36.5 (36.4, 36.6) N/A 138,021 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Autauga County 6 45.4 (38.3, 53.5) 27 (5, 61) 30 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Baldwin County 6 37.3 (34.2, 40.7) 52 (34, 64) 115 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Barbour County 6 36.2 (27.2, 47.3) 56 (10, 67) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 2.4)
Bibb County 6 49.0 (38.0, 62.5) 12 (2, 64) 14 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.8, 0.2)
Blount County 6 38.9 (32.6, 46.3) 48 (14, 66) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Bullock County 6 35.8 (22.4, 54.7) 58 (4, 67) 5 stable stable trend -4.9 (-11.0, 0.2)
Butler County 6 47.6 (36.3, 61.7) 18 (2, 66) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 3.9)
Calhoun County 6 45.7 (40.7, 51.2) 26 (8, 51) 65 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Chambers County 6 44.4 (36.1, 54.4) 33 (5, 65) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
Cherokee County 6 33.8 (25.4, 44.3) 62 (17, 67) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.5)
Chilton County 6 44.0 (36.2, 53.0) 37 (5, 64) 24 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.5, 19.7)
Choctaw County 6 50.2 (36.2, 68.4) 10 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.3, 6.8)
Clarke County 6 71.4 (58.7, 86.1) 1 (1, 14) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Clay County 6 49.6 (36.0, 67.3) 11 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.5)
Cleburne County 6 46.9 (34.7, 62.5) 23 (2, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 2.9)
Coffee County 6 35.2 (28.8, 42.6) 60 (23, 67) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.0, 2.2)
Colbert County 6 44.8 (38.0, 52.4) 31 (6, 61) 34 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Conecuh County 6 45.3 (31.8, 63.3) 28 (1, 67) 9 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.3, -0.7)
Coosa County 6 33.3 (21.0, 51.1) 64 (5, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 4.0)
Covington County 6 42.1 (34.3, 51.3) 41 (6, 66) 22 falling falling trend -7.4 (-23.9, -0.7)
Crenshaw County 6 59.5 (44.1, 78.9) 4 (1, 58) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.4)
Cullman County 6 41.2 (35.8, 47.2) 44 (13, 64) 45 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Dale County 6 35.1 (28.6, 42.7) 61 (21, 67) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.6)
Dallas County 6 57.3 (47.9, 68.1) 5 (1, 38) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.6)
DeKalb County 6 43.5 (37.4, 50.2) 38 (9, 62) 39 stable stable trend -12.2 (-21.3, 0.0)
Elmore County 6 42.8 (37.0, 49.3) 39 (10, 61) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Escambia County 6 46.9 (38.3, 56.9) 22 (3, 61) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.1)
Etowah County 6 44.2 (39.2, 49.7) 34 (10, 55) 61 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 6.6)
Fayette County 6 48.7 (36.5, 64.0) 15 (1, 66) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.8, 6.1)
Franklin County 6 47.4 (38.2, 58.3) 20 (3, 62) 19 rising rising trend 10.6 (0.1, 20.3)
Geneva County 6 32.7 (24.3, 43.1) 66 (21, 67) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.8, -0.1)
Greene County 6 61.5 (41.3, 88.9) 3 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.4)
Hale County 6 41.2 (29.5, 56.5) 45 (3, 67) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.2)
Henry County 6 33.1 (23.6, 45.7) 65 (12, 67) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.2, 1.4)
Houston County 6 36.4 (31.9, 41.5) 55 (30, 67) 49 falling falling trend -10.6 (-21.2, -0.9)
Jackson County 6 47.1 (40.0, 55.2) 21 (5, 56) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Jefferson County 6 35.8 (33.9, 37.8) 57 (45, 64) 278 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 1.6)
Lamar County 6 44.5 (31.9, 60.8) 32 (2, 67) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 3.2)
Lauderdale County 6 40.4 (35.3, 46.0) 47 (14, 63) 51 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Lawrence County 6 52.4 (42.9, 63.6) 8 (2, 53) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.3)
Lee County 6 32.2 (28.3, 36.5) 67 (46, 67) 51 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Limestone County 6 37.3 (32.3, 42.7) 53 (27, 67) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 5.6)
Lowndes County 6 66.8 (47.5, 91.8) 2 (1, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 3.4)
Macon County 6 54.5 (41.5, 70.8) 6 (1, 58) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.7, 5.8)
Madison County 6 37.5 (34.9, 40.3) 51 (37, 63) 162 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Marengo County 6 53.6 (41.6, 68.3) 7 (1, 59) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.2)
Marion County 6 44.1 (35.4, 54.5) 35 (4, 65) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
Marshall County 6 41.0 (35.8, 46.8) 46 (13, 63) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Mobile County 6 45.0 (42.4, 47.8) 29 (14, 43) 224 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Monroe County 6 48.6 (37.8, 61.9) 16 (2, 64) 15 falling falling trend -8.6 (-26.9, -0.9)
Montgomery County 6 44.1 (40.4, 47.9) 36 (12, 51) 114 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.1, 11.2)
Morgan County 6 46.0 (41.2, 51.3) 24 (7, 49) 70 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Perry County 6 41.6 (26.8, 62.4) 43 (2, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.6, 3.8)
Pickens County 6 47.5 (36.5, 61.1) 19 (2, 65) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 3.3)
Pike County 6 38.3 (29.6, 48.7) 49 (9, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Randolph County 6 42.6 (32.7, 54.8) 40 (4, 67) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.0, 5.1)
Russell County 6 36.5 (30.1, 43.9) 54 (21, 67) 24 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.0)
Shelby County 6 33.3 (30.1, 36.7) 63 (47, 67) 83 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.3)
St. Clair County 6 42.0 (36.6, 48.0) 42 (12, 62) 46 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.4)
Sumter County 6 47.9 (32.1, 69.0) 17 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.9 (-4.1, 10.8)
Talladega County 6 45.8 (39.9, 52.3) 25 (6, 56) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2)
Tallapoosa County 6 45.0 (37.2, 54.1) 30 (5, 63) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.7)
Tuscaloosa County 6 37.6 (33.9, 41.6) 50 (31, 65) 80 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.2)
Walker County 6 48.9 (42.2, 56.5) 13 (3, 49) 41 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.7)
Washington County 6 51.0 (37.7, 67.7) 9 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.6)
Wilcox County 6 48.7 (33.5, 69.2) 14 (1, 67) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.8)
Winston County 6 35.6 (27.3, 46.0) 59 (13, 67) 13 falling falling trend -6.2 (-20.9, -2.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/24/2024 12:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top