Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 N/A 8.4 (8.1, 8.7) N/A 567 rising rising trend 3.9 (3.3, 4.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 9.3 (8.4, 10.3) 15 (7, 25) 80 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.9, 4.6)
Mobile County 6 Urban 11.4 (10.2, 12.8) 5 (2, 16) 64 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.5, 6.2)
Madison County 6 Urban 8.1 (6.9, 9.3) 22 (11, 35) 39 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.9, 4.1)
Baldwin County 6 Urban 6.7 (5.5, 8.0) 33 (18, 42) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-9.9, 2.2)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 7.9 (6.5, 9.5) 25 (10, 39) 23 stable stable trend 6.8 (-9.9, 23.9)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 12.0 (9.7, 14.9) 4 (1, 20) 19 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.6, 10.0)
Shelby County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.3, 8.1) 34 (18, 42) 18 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.3, 7.6)
Tuscaloosa County 6 Urban 6.5 (5.2, 8.2) 35 (18, 42) 17 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.3, 6.8)
Etowah County 6 Urban 10.5 (8.3, 13.2) 7 (1, 29) 16 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.7, 7.3)
Marshall County 6 Rural 11.4 (8.9, 14.4) 6 (1, 27) 15 rising rising trend 7.2 (4.5, 11.1)
Morgan County 6 Urban 7.5 (5.7, 9.7) 28 (9, 42) 13 rising rising trend 14.1 (3.6, 33.7)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 9.8 (7.4, 12.7) 11 (2, 35) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 6.1)
Talladega County 6 Rural 10.3 (7.8, 13.5) 9 (1, 34) 12 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.2, 13.3)
Cullman County 6 Rural 9.7 (7.4, 12.7) 12 (2, 36) 12 rising rising trend 6.9 (3.9, 11.1)
Walker County 6 Urban 12.2 (9.1, 16.0) 3 (1, 26) 11 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.9, 10.4)
Houston County 6 Urban 7.3 (5.5, 9.7) 30 (9, 42) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 7.1)
Elmore County 6 Urban 8.0 (5.8, 10.9) 23 (5, 42) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.1)
Lee County 6 Urban 5.0 (3.6, 6.8) 42 (26, 43) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.1, 4.5)
Limestone County 6 Urban 6.4 (4.6, 8.7) 37 (15, 43) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 6.3)
Lauderdale County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.0, 7.9) 40 (19, 43) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-16.4, 3.7)
Blount County 6 Urban 9.3 (6.5, 12.9) 16 (2, 40) 8
*
*
Colbert County 6 Urban 9.4 (6.6, 13.0) 14 (1, 40) 8
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Rural 7.4 (5.2, 10.5) 29 (6, 43) 7 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.6, 10.7)
Russell County 6 Urban 7.8 (5.2, 11.3) 26 (4, 43) 6
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural 10.5 (6.9, 15.9) 8 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Autauga County 6 Urban 6.5 (4.2, 9.8) 36 (9, 43) 5
*
*
Chilton County 6 Urban 8.6 (5.5, 12.9) 20 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.9)
Escambia County 6 Rural 9.4 (6.1, 14.2) 13 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 4.1)
Randolph County 6 Rural 13.1 (8.5, 20.1) 2 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Dale County 6 Rural 7.2 (4.6, 10.9) 31 (5, 43) 5
*
*
Dallas County 6 Rural 9.0 (5.6, 13.8) 17 (1, 43) 5
*
*
Coffee County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.9, 9.5) 38 (10, 43) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 7.9)
Jackson County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.9, 9.6) 39 (9, 43) 5
*
*
Chambers County 6 Rural 8.2 (5.0, 12.9) 21 (2, 43) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.8, 9.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 16.6 (9.8, 27.0) 1 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Urban 7.2 (4.2, 11.8) 32 (3, 43) 4
*
*
Barbour County 6 Rural 8.8 (5.1, 14.7) 18 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Cherokee County 6 Rural 7.9 (4.5, 13.5) 24 (2, 43) 3
*
*
Clarke County 6 Rural 9.9 (5.6, 16.5) 10 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Geneva County 6 Urban 8.6 (5.0, 14.3) 19 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Tallapoosa County 6 Rural 4.7 (2.7, 7.9) 43 (19, 43) 3
*
*
Covington County 6 Rural 5.3 (3.0, 9.1) 41 (12, 43) 3
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 7.8 (4.4, 12.9) 27 (2, 43) 3
*
*
Bibb County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 8:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bibb, Bullock, Butler, Choctaw, Clay, Cleburne, Conecuh, Coosa, Crenshaw, Fayette, Greene, Hale, Henry, Lamar, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Monroe, Perry, Pickens, Pike, Sumter, Wilcox, Winston

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top