Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 N/A 8.4 (8.1, 8.7) N/A 567 rising rising trend 3.9 (3.3, 4.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Tallapoosa County 6 Rural 4.7 (2.7, 7.9) 43 (19, 43) 3
*
*
Lee County 6 Urban 5.0 (3.6, 6.8) 42 (26, 43) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.1, 4.5)
Covington County 6 Rural 5.3 (3.0, 9.1) 41 (12, 43) 3
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.0, 7.9) 40 (19, 43) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-16.4, 3.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.9, 9.6) 39 (9, 43) 5
*
*
Coffee County 6 Rural 6.2 (3.9, 9.5) 38 (10, 43) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 7.9)
Limestone County 6 Urban 6.4 (4.6, 8.7) 37 (15, 43) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 6.3)
Autauga County 6 Urban 6.5 (4.2, 9.8) 36 (9, 43) 5
*
*
Tuscaloosa County 6 Urban 6.5 (5.2, 8.2) 35 (18, 42) 17 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.3, 6.8)
Shelby County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.3, 8.1) 34 (18, 42) 18 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.3, 7.6)
Baldwin County 6 Urban 6.7 (5.5, 8.0) 33 (18, 42) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-9.9, 2.2)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 7.2 (4.2, 11.8) 32 (3, 43) 4
*
*
Dale County 6 Rural 7.2 (4.6, 10.9) 31 (5, 43) 5
*
*
Houston County 6 Urban 7.3 (5.5, 9.7) 30 (9, 42) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 7.1)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 7.4 (5.2, 10.5) 29 (6, 43) 7 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.6, 10.7)
Morgan County 6 Urban 7.5 (5.7, 9.7) 28 (9, 42) 13 rising rising trend 14.1 (3.6, 33.7)
Franklin County 6 Rural 7.8 (4.4, 12.9) 27 (2, 43) 3
*
*
Russell County 6 Urban 7.8 (5.2, 11.3) 26 (4, 43) 6
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Urban 7.9 (6.5, 9.5) 25 (10, 39) 23 stable stable trend 6.8 (-9.9, 23.9)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 7.9 (4.5, 13.5) 24 (2, 43) 3
*
*
Elmore County 6 Urban 8.0 (5.8, 10.9) 23 (5, 42) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 8.1 (6.9, 9.3) 22 (11, 35) 39 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.9, 4.1)
Chambers County 6 Rural 8.2 (5.0, 12.9) 21 (2, 43) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.8, 9.5)
Chilton County 6 Urban 8.6 (5.5, 12.9) 20 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.9)
Geneva County 6 Urban 8.6 (5.0, 14.3) 19 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Barbour County 6 Rural 8.8 (5.1, 14.7) 18 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Dallas County 6 Rural 9.0 (5.6, 13.8) 17 (1, 43) 5
*
*
Blount County 6 Urban 9.3 (6.5, 12.9) 16 (2, 40) 8
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Urban 9.3 (8.4, 10.3) 15 (7, 25) 80 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.9, 4.6)
Colbert County 6 Urban 9.4 (6.6, 13.0) 14 (1, 40) 8
*
*
Escambia County 6 Rural 9.4 (6.1, 14.2) 13 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 4.1)
Cullman County 6 Rural 9.7 (7.4, 12.7) 12 (2, 36) 12 rising rising trend 6.9 (3.9, 11.1)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 9.8 (7.4, 12.7) 11 (2, 35) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 6.1)
Clarke County 6 Rural 9.9 (5.6, 16.5) 10 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Talladega County 6 Rural 10.3 (7.8, 13.5) 9 (1, 34) 12 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.2, 13.3)
Marion County 6 Rural 10.5 (6.9, 15.9) 8 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Etowah County 6 Urban 10.5 (8.3, 13.2) 7 (1, 29) 16 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.7, 7.3)
Marshall County 6 Rural 11.4 (8.9, 14.4) 6 (1, 27) 15 rising rising trend 7.2 (4.5, 11.1)
Mobile County 6 Urban 11.4 (10.2, 12.8) 5 (2, 16) 64 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.5, 6.2)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 12.0 (9.7, 14.9) 4 (1, 20) 19 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.6, 10.0)
Walker County 6 Urban 12.2 (9.1, 16.0) 3 (1, 26) 11 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.9, 10.4)
Randolph County 6 Rural 13.1 (8.5, 20.1) 2 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural 16.6 (9.8, 27.0) 1 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Bibb County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top