Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 60.1 (59.3, 61.0) N/A 3,904 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.9, 54.1) N/A 215,307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Perry County 6 31.1 (19.2, 48.9) 67 (50, 67) 4 falling falling trend -10.5 (-31.5, -5.5)
Washington County 6 41.5 (30.9, 55.2) 66 (39, 67) 10 falling falling trend -10.8 (-30.3, -3.9)
Choctaw County 6 41.9 (30.8, 56.8) 65 (37, 67) 10 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.8, 0.3)
Shelby County 6 45.4 (41.7, 49.3) 64 (56, 67) 118 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.6, -2.6)
Lee County 6 45.6 (40.9, 50.7) 63 (53, 67) 72 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.4)
Marengo County 6 49.2 (37.8, 63.4) 62 (21, 67) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Macon County 6 51.0 (40.0, 64.9) 61 (15, 67) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.6, 4.6)
Montgomery County 6 52.0 (48.2, 56.1) 60 (44, 64) 140 falling falling trend -3.0 (-8.3, -1.6)
Madison County 6 52.5 (49.5, 55.6) 59 (46, 63) 239 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -1.8)
DeKalb County 6 52.7 (46.3, 59.7) 58 (33, 66) 51 stable stable trend -3.2 (-13.2, 0.3)
Monroe County 6 52.7 (42.2, 65.6) 57 (15, 67) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 53.2 (50.9, 55.5) 56 (46, 62) 437 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.8)
Houston County 6 54.1 (48.8, 59.9) 55 (33, 64) 78 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.3, -2.5)
Hale County 6 54.6 (41.5, 71.2) 54 (6, 67) 12 stable stable trend 8.0 (-6.3, 25.2)
Limestone County 6 55.1 (49.3, 61.4) 53 (30, 63) 68 falling falling trend -3.3 (-12.3, -1.8)
Coosa County 6 55.6 (40.5, 75.7) 52 (3, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.3, 1.4)
Tuscaloosa County 6 56.4 (52.0, 61.1) 51 (31, 61) 127 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.8)
Dallas County 6 57.4 (48.5, 67.7) 50 (13, 65) 30 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.4)
Cherokee County 6 58.0 (48.2, 69.7) 49 (9, 65) 26 falling falling trend -6.8 (-19.7, -2.0)
Lauderdale County 6 58.6 (52.9, 64.9) 48 (22, 60) 80 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Chambers County 6 59.2 (49.8, 70.0) 47 (10, 64) 29 stable stable trend -10.4 (-21.2, 0.0)
Chilton County 6 59.2 (50.5, 69.1) 46 (12, 63) 34 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.2)
Butler County 6 59.9 (47.7, 74.7) 45 (4, 66) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.6, -0.3)
Greene County 6 60.2 (43.1, 83.3) 44 (1, 67) 8
*
*
Coffee County 6 60.8 (52.8, 69.8) 43 (11, 62) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Mobile County 6 60.9 (57.9, 64.0) 42 (26, 51) 324 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -2.0)
Bullock County 6 60.9 (43.2, 84.0) 41 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.6)
Baldwin County 6 61.4 (57.6, 65.4) 40 (23, 52) 206 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Henry County 6 62.5 (49.8, 78.1) 39 (3, 65) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Barbour County 6 62.8 (51.5, 76.0) 38 (4, 64) 23 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Sumter County 6 63.2 (46.7, 84.1) 37 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.0, 5.5)
Pickens County 6 63.2 (50.8, 78.0) 36 (3, 64) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.2)
Russell County 6 63.2 (54.9, 72.4) 35 (7, 60) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.6)
Wilcox County 6 63.3 (46.5, 84.9) 34 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 4.0)
Clarke County 6 63.5 (52.0, 77.2) 33 (3, 64) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Cullman County 6 63.8 (57.4, 70.7) 32 (10, 54) 77 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.4)
Pike County 6 64.5 (53.4, 77.4) 31 (3, 62) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.5)
Fayette County 6 65.1 (51.8, 81.3) 30 (1, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.9, 1.9)
Blount County 6 65.3 (57.6, 73.9) 29 (7, 55) 53 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Autauga County 6 65.3 (57.0, 74.6) 28 (5, 56) 45 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.8)
Cleburne County 6 65.7 (50.9, 84.0) 27 (1, 65) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 2.1)
Marion County 6 65.9 (55.9, 77.4) 26 (3, 59) 32 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Talladega County 6 66.3 (59.6, 73.6) 25 (6, 51) 75 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Marshall County 6 66.7 (60.4, 73.5) 24 (7, 49) 85 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Conecuh County 6 66.8 (51.8, 85.7) 23 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.8)
Morgan County 6 67.1 (61.5, 73.1) 22 (7, 46) 110 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Colbert County 6 67.2 (59.3, 75.9) 21 (5, 53) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.8)
Dale County 6 67.9 (59.2, 77.7) 20 (3, 53) 45 falling falling trend -11.3 (-18.2, -2.9)
Franklin County 6 69.7 (58.5, 82.5) 19 (2, 58) 28 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Winston County 6 69.7 (58.4, 82.9) 18 (1, 58) 28 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Tallapoosa County 6 69.7 (60.7, 79.9) 17 (2, 50) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.2)
Etowah County 6 70.2 (64.2, 76.7) 16 (4, 41) 104 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Elmore County 6 71.0 (63.8, 78.9) 15 (3, 43) 73 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Lawrence County 6 71.7 (61.4, 83.4) 14 (1, 52) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.7)
Jackson County 6 72.7 (64.4, 82.0) 13 (2, 45) 58 falling falling trend -5.1 (-12.3, -0.4)
St. Clair County 6 73.1 (66.3, 80.5) 12 (2, 37) 87 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Randolph County 6 73.5 (60.8, 88.3) 11 (1, 52) 25 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 5.9)
Calhoun County 6 74.5 (68.4, 81.0) 10 (2, 33) 116 stable stable trend -1.9 (-9.8, 1.5)
Geneva County 6 74.6 (62.8, 88.3) 9 (1, 50) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Escambia County 6 74.8 (64.4, 86.5) 8 (1, 47) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Covington County 6 75.3 (65.5, 86.3) 7 (1, 42) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Lamar County 6 79.7 (63.0, 100.2) 6 (1, 56) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.1)
Lowndes County 6 80.7 (61.0, 105.4) 5 (1, 59) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.1, 6.9)
Bibb County 6 81.0 (67.0, 97.4) 4 (1, 45) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.2)
Walker County 6 82.6 (74.6, 91.4) 3 (1, 20) 80 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Clay County 6 84.4 (67.6, 104.9) 2 (1, 45) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Crenshaw County 6 87.1 (69.4, 108.4) 1 (1, 44) 18 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.5, 7.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top