Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 N/A 21.3 (20.7, 21.8) N/A 1,273 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Autauga County 6 Urban 24.0 (18.8, 30.1) 18 (4, 43) 16 stable stable trend -17.9 (-42.7, 2.9)
Baldwin County 6 Urban 37.2 (34.0, 40.5) 3 (1, 6) 115 stable stable trend 2.6 (-4.0, 4.6)
Bibb County 6 Urban 15.5 (9.5, 24.2) 47 (10, 55) 4
*
*
Blount County 6 Urban 19.4 (15.0, 24.7) 34 (11, 51) 14 falling falling trend -4.3 (-16.2, -0.9)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 25.2 (21.3, 29.5) 15 (5, 35) 33 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 5.7)
Chilton County 6 Urban 17.7 (13.0, 23.7) 41 (11, 54) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.2)
Colbert County 6 Urban 21.4 (16.8, 27.1) 23 (7, 49) 16 stable stable trend -2.2 (-18.6, 1.4)
Elmore County 6 Urban 27.6 (23.1, 32.7) 9 (3, 29) 28 falling falling trend -14.0 (-30.6, -3.4)
Etowah County 6 Urban 21.1 (17.6, 25.2) 25 (10, 46) 27 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.9)
Geneva County 6 Urban 39.7 (30.1, 51.6) 1 (1, 16) 13 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.9, 6.7)
Henry County 6 Urban 38.7 (27.8, 52.8) 2 (1, 27) 10
*
*
Houston County 6 Urban 29.2 (25.2, 33.8) 6 (2, 22) 39 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.5, 7.9)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 15.9 (14.7, 17.3) 46 (35, 51) 120 stable stable trend -0.7 (-17.0, 3.7)
Lauderdale County 6 Urban 20.6 (17.0, 24.8) 28 (12, 47) 25 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.8, 6.5)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 32.8 (25.0, 42.3) 4 (1, 28) 13 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.7, 9.2)
Lee County 6 Urban 15.5 (12.8, 18.5) 48 (30, 53) 26 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 5.0)
Limestone County 6 Urban 31.7 (27.2, 36.7) 5 (1, 18) 37 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.5, 9.6)
Madison County 6 Urban 25.5 (23.4, 27.7) 13 (7, 25) 112 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.9, 4.8)
Mobile County 6 Urban 20.7 (18.9, 22.7) 26 (17, 40) 101 stable stable trend -2.0 (-15.0, 2.6)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 14.9 (12.8, 17.2) 50 (35, 53) 38 falling falling trend -21.6 (-35.9, -3.6)
Morgan County 6 Urban 28.9 (25.1, 33.2) 7 (3, 22) 44 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.1, 5.2)
Russell County 6 Urban 9.4 (6.3, 13.5) 54 (45, 55) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-25.3, -1.2)
Shelby County 6 Urban 20.7 (18.2, 23.4) 27 (15, 42) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.8)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 21.4 (17.6, 25.9) 24 (9, 46) 23 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.9, 4.7)
Tuscaloosa County 6 Urban 14.2 (12.0, 16.6) 51 (36, 54) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Walker County 6 Urban 25.4 (20.5, 31.1) 14 (3, 40) 21 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.3, 7.2)
Barbour County 6 Rural 22.8 (16.3, 31.3) 19 (4, 51) 8
*
*
Butler County 6 Rural 17.9 (11.0, 27.6) 39 (5, 55) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.1, 7.5)
Chambers County 6 Rural 9.1 (5.7, 14.1) 55 (43, 55) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.1, 6.5)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 17.5 (11.4, 25.9) 42 (7, 55) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.6, 8.4)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 19.8 (11.7, 32.3) 33 (3, 55) 4
*
*
Clarke County 6 Rural 21.7 (14.7, 31.1) 22 (3, 53) 7
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural 18.7 (11.3, 29.7) 38 (5, 55) 4
*
*
Cleburne County 6 Rural 19.8 (11.9, 31.4) 32 (3, 55) 4
*
*
Coffee County 6 Rural 22.5 (17.5, 28.6) 20 (5, 48) 14 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.1, 9.4)
Covington County 6 Rural 20.3 (14.6, 27.4) 30 (6, 52) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 7.0)
Crenshaw County 6 Rural 20.5 (11.2, 34.5) 29 (2, 55) 3 stable stable trend -25.4 (-58.8, 3.5)
Cullman County 6 Rural 26.2 (21.9, 31.1) 10 (4, 34) 29 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 5.9)
Dale County 6 Rural 25.8 (20.1, 32.5) 11 (3, 41) 15 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.4, 6.8)
Dallas County 6 Rural 11.8 (7.3, 18.0) 53 (29, 55) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.1, 5.8)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 18.7 (14.8, 23.4) 37 (13, 52) 17 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 4.2)
Escambia County 6 Rural 18.8 (13.5, 25.6) 36 (9, 53) 9 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.1, 7.0)
Fayette County 6 Rural 16.9 (9.8, 27.7) 44 (6, 55) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 15.1 (9.9, 22.1) 49 (17, 55) 6 stable stable trend -20.6 (-49.6, 0.9)
Jackson County 6 Rural 27.6 (22.2, 34.0) 8 (2, 34) 20 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.3)
Lamar County 6 Rural 24.5 (14.1, 39.5) 17 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural 20.2 (14.0, 28.4) 31 (5, 53) 8 rising rising trend 25.2 (0.9, 46.4)
Marshall County 6 Rural 22.4 (18.6, 26.7) 21 (7, 42) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.7)
Monroe County 6 Rural 13.6 (8.1, 21.9) 52 (17, 55) 4
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural 19.4 (13.3, 27.4) 35 (6, 54) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.3, 7.2)
Randolph County 6 Rural 17.9 (11.2, 27.2) 40 (6, 55) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.8, 4.5)
Talladega County 6 Rural 16.1 (12.8, 20.2) 45 (22, 53) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.8)
Tallapoosa County 6 Rural 25.0 (18.8, 32.8) 16 (2, 45) 13 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.5, 8.6)
Washington County 6 Rural 17.0 (9.8, 27.9) 43 (5, 55) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.7, 7.0)
Winston County 6 Rural 25.5 (18.3, 35.0) 12 (2, 50) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.8, 3.3)
Bullock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/12/2024 9:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bullock, Conecuh, Coosa, Greene, Hale, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Perry, Pickens, Sumter, Wilcox

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top