Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Cervix (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 N/A 9.3 (8.8, 9.9) N/A 242 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 4.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 7.5 (7.5, 7.6) N/A 12,670 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.4, 9.1) 20 (13, 22) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Mobile County 6 Urban 10.1 (8.2, 12.3) 13 (4, 20) 22 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 4.0)
Baldwin County 6 Urban 12.1 (9.3, 15.5) 9 (1, 18) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.3, 7.6)
Madison County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.3, 8.8) 22 (14, 23) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.8, 5.6)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 10.5 (8.0, 13.4) 11 (3, 21) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.6)
Tuscaloosa County 6 Urban 9.1 (6.6, 12.1) 17 (4, 22) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.3, 4.7)
Etowah County 6 Urban 13.6 (9.4, 19.1) 1 (1, 19) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.4, 7.0)
Lee County 6 Urban 9.0 (6.3, 12.6) 18 (4, 22) 7
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Urban 12.5 (8.5, 17.6) 5 (1, 21) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.3, 6.9)
Marshall County 6 Rural 12.5 (8.3, 17.9) 6 (1, 21) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.4, 5.7)
Talladega County 6 Rural 13.0 (8.5, 18.9) 4 (1, 20) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.7)
Elmore County 6 Urban 11.8 (7.7, 17.4) 10 (1, 22) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.3, 3.3)
Houston County 6 Urban 8.4 (5.4, 12.5) 19 (4, 23) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.4)
Limestone County 6 Urban 9.9 (6.4, 14.6) 14 (2, 22) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.2, 5.1)
Morgan County 6 Urban 9.3 (6.0, 13.6) 16 (2, 22) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.6, 0.3)
Shelby County 6 Urban 4.2 (2.7, 6.2) 23 (21, 23) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.5, 3.4)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 9.4 (5.8, 14.3) 15 (2, 23) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 4.3)
Walker County 6 Urban 13.3 (8.1, 20.6) 2 (1, 22) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-8.0, 9.2)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 10.4 (6.1, 16.5) 12 (1, 23) 4
*
*
Russell County 6 Urban 12.4 (7.3, 19.6) 7 (1, 22) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.6, 3.4)
Lauderdale County 6 Urban 6.9 (3.9, 11.3) 21 (5, 23) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural 13.2 (7.4, 21.5) 3 (1, 22) 3
*
*
Chilton County 6 Urban 12.2 (6.7, 20.4) 8 (1, 23) 3
*
*
Autauga County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barbour County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blount County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chambers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coffee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colbert County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cullman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Escambia County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallapoosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 5:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Autauga, Barbour, Bibb, Blount, Bullock, Butler, Chambers, Cherokee, Choctaw, Clarke, Clay, Cleburne, Coffee, Colbert, Conecuh, Coosa, Covington, Crenshaw, Cullman, Dale, Dallas, Escambia, Fayette, Franklin, Geneva, Greene, Hale, Henry, Lamar, Lawrence, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Marion, Monroe, Perry, Pickens, Pike, Randolph, Sumter, Tallapoosa, Washington, Wilcox, Winston

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top