Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 120.3 (118.5, 122.1) N/A 3,693 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Cullman County 6 69.1 (59.6, 79.9) 67 (59, 67) 40 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.9)
Cherokee County 6 75.7 (60.3, 94.9) 66 (43, 67) 17 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.2, -2.1)
Jackson County 6 79.3 (66.6, 93.9) 65 (45, 67) 30 falling falling trend -4.7 (-14.0, -1.3)
Escambia County 6 82.4 (66.7, 101.0) 64 (37, 67) 20 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.0, -2.5)
DeKalb County 6 83.4 (71.9, 96.4) 63 (44, 67) 39 stable stable trend 5.9 (-4.3, 13.9)
Lauderdale County 6 84.4 (74.5, 95.5) 62 (44, 67) 54 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.2, -2.7)
Baldwin County 6 87.2 (80.8, 94.1) 61 (47, 65) 144 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.1, -3.1)
Marshall County 6 87.7 (77.2, 99.2) 60 (41, 67) 53 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.0)
Covington County 6 88.0 (72.2, 106.6) 59 (33, 67) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.7, 10.7)
Conecuh County 6 88.8 (63.2, 123.1) 58 (17, 67) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.5, 0.8)
Madison County 6 88.8 (83.1, 94.7) 57 (47, 65) 195 falling falling trend -4.8 (-18.3, -0.2)
Blount County 6 89.2 (76.2, 103.9) 56 (37, 67) 35 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.7)
Mobile County 6 93.7 (88.2, 99.3) 55 (43, 62) 238 falling falling trend -6.5 (-8.1, -5.5)
Winston County 6 94.8 (75.7, 118.0) 54 (24, 67) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 4.0)
Monroe County 6 95.2 (73.4, 122.3) 53 (20, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 1.0)
Limestone County 6 96.1 (85.0, 108.3) 52 (35, 65) 58 falling falling trend -7.6 (-20.8, -4.1)
Lawrence County 6 96.4 (78.9, 117.0) 51 (26, 67) 22 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.6, -0.2)
Russell County 6 99.1 (83.7, 116.5) 50 (25, 66) 32 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.7, -0.4)
Marion County 6 100.1 (82.1, 121.4) 49 (23, 66) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Randolph County 6 100.1 (79.9, 124.8) 48 (20, 66) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.1)
Cleburne County 6 101.1 (75.5, 133.7) 47 (15, 67) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.7)
Pickens County 6 101.4 (78.9, 129.1) 46 (16, 67) 14 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.2, -0.6)
Etowah County 6 102.8 (92.0, 114.5) 45 (29, 61) 71 falling falling trend -4.7 (-14.5, -3.2)
Coosa County 6 103.0 (76.3, 139.2) 44 (13, 67) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.3)
Bibb County 6 104.4 (81.6, 131.9) 43 (14, 67) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -1.7)
Coffee County 6 105.1 (89.6, 122.6) 42 (21, 63) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.3)
Talladega County 6 105.4 (93.2, 119.0) 41 (25, 60) 57 stable stable trend 6.6 (-0.7, 13.6)
Chilton County 6 108.6 (91.3, 128.3) 40 (18, 63) 29 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Lamar County 6 108.8 (82.4, 142.3) 39 (11, 67) 12 falling falling trend -5.6 (-15.4, -2.5)
Colbert County 6 111.6 (96.8, 128.2) 38 (19, 58) 42 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 5.3)
Dale County 6 112.3 (96.0, 130.9) 37 (16, 59) 35 falling falling trend -4.9 (-20.5, -1.0)
Franklin County 6 112.8 (92.1, 137.1) 36 (13, 65) 21 rising rising trend 19.4 (2.5, 32.6)
Washington County 6 114.0 (88.0, 146.4) 35 (8, 66) 14 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.4, -2.3)
Lee County 6 114.0 (103.3, 125.5) 34 (21, 50) 90 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.6)
Geneva County 6 114.6 (93.9, 139.2) 33 (12, 63) 22 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.5, 0.6)
Fayette County 6 118.6 (92.2, 151.3) 32 (8, 65) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.8, 5.9)
Clay County 6 118.7 (90.0, 155.1) 31 (6, 65) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 4.7)
St. Clair County 6 120.4 (107.6, 134.4) 30 (16, 47) 68 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Morgan County 6 121.4 (110.3, 133.3) 29 (17, 45) 92 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.9)
Houston County 6 125.6 (113.7, 138.5) 28 (15, 43) 85 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Clarke County 6 126.3 (102.6, 154.4) 27 (7, 55) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
Crenshaw County 6 127.1 (97.1, 164.7) 26 (4, 63) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 3.0)
Pike County 6 128.2 (105.4, 154.8) 25 (7, 56) 23 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.1)
Walker County 6 128.5 (113.4, 145.3) 24 (11, 43) 56 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.6)
Tallapoosa County 6 129.0 (111.8, 148.6) 23 (10, 47) 43 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.6)
Butler County 6 131.8 (105.2, 163.9) 22 (5, 57) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.1, 4.5)
Tuscaloosa County 6 132.0 (122.1, 142.5) 21 (13, 35) 142 falling falling trend -13.5 (-24.2, -1.8)
Calhoun County 6 135.7 (123.5, 148.8) 20 (10, 34) 97 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Shelby County 6 137.1 (127.9, 146.7) 19 (11, 31) 177 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.7)
Chambers County 6 137.9 (117.2, 161.6) 18 (6, 43) 33 falling falling trend -3.8 (-20.2, -0.5)
Marengo County 6 141.2 (113.7, 174.3) 17 (3, 49) 19 stable stable trend -4.1 (-29.5, 0.7)
Elmore County 6 144.3 (129.3, 160.7) 16 (6, 31) 72 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 4.2)
Hale County 6 149.1 (115.9, 189.8) 15 (2, 49) 15 rising rising trend 6.3 (0.5, 14.7)
Henry County 6 151.0 (122.6, 185.3) 14 (2, 43) 21 rising rising trend 12.9 (1.0, 28.1)
Dallas County 6 152.8 (130.6, 177.9) 13 (3, 33) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.1)
Autauga County 6 156.2 (137.3, 177.1) 12 (3, 27) 51 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.9)
Montgomery County 6 158.1 (148.1, 168.7) 11 (4, 18) 194 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 9.8)
Jefferson County 6 158.8 (153.1, 164.8) 10 (5, 16) 608 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Wilcox County 6 164.1 (123.0, 216.0) 9 (1, 50) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.3, 1.9)
Choctaw County 6 165.0 (130.8, 207.1) 8 (1, 39) 17 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.3, 8.1)
Greene County 6 168.4 (121.7, 229.0) 7 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.7, 3.0)
Barbour County 6 177.6 (150.0, 209.2) 6 (1, 22) 31 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.5, 3.7)
Bullock County 6 178.1 (134.1, 232.8) 5 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.2)
Perry County 6 183.0 (133.7, 245.9) 4 (1, 47) 10 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.4, 1.1)
Sumter County 6 189.2 (145.3, 243.4) 3 (1, 31) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.1)
Macon County 6 204.9 (168.4, 247.8) 2 (1, 14) 24 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.3)
Lowndes County 6 205.9 (159.2, 263.8) 1 (1, 23) 14 stable stable trend -3.5 (-21.3, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 2:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top