Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 18.7 (18.2, 19.2) N/A 1,117 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.6, 2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.3 (17.3, 17.4) N/A 66,203 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Lee County 6 12.5 (10.1, 15.3) 62 (45, 62) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.6)
Monroe County 6 12.7 (7.8, 20.2) 61 (14, 62) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.4, 5.8)
Blount County 6 12.9 (9.4, 17.2) 60 (34, 62) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.7)
Geneva County 6 13.6 (9.0, 20.1) 59 (17, 62) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 6.0)
Cherokee County 6 14.4 (9.4, 21.5) 58 (13, 62) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.8, 3.3)
Shelby County 6 15.3 (13.2, 17.7) 57 (34, 61) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.3)
Lawrence County 6 15.6 (10.7, 22.1) 56 (10, 62) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.4)
Marshall County 6 15.6 (12.4, 19.3) 55 (22, 62) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.5)
Pickens County 6 15.8 (9.5, 24.8) 54 (4, 62) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.2, 6.2)
Russell County 6 16.0 (11.8, 21.3) 53 (14, 62) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.5, 4.2)
Cullman County 6 16.1 (12.7, 20.2) 52 (16, 62) 17 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.1, 5.6)
Coffee County 6 16.3 (12.0, 21.6) 51 (12, 62) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.0)
Jefferson County 6 16.3 (15.0, 17.7) 50 (35, 57) 129 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
DeKalb County 6 16.6 (12.9, 21.2) 49 (13, 62) 14 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.1, 7.8)
Coosa County 6 16.6 (9.3, 29.3) 48 (2, 62) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.4, 8.5)
Talladega County 6 16.7 (13.3, 20.8) 47 (14, 62) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.3)
Pike County 6 17.4 (11.7, 25.0) 46 (4, 62) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.8, 8.1)
Etowah County 6 17.8 (14.7, 21.5) 45 (12, 59) 25 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 4.6)
Dale County 6 17.9 (13.2, 23.7) 44 (7, 62) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 5.7)
Montgomery County 6 17.9 (15.6, 20.5) 43 (17, 57) 45 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.2, 4.2)
Macon County 6 18.0 (11.3, 27.8) 42 (3, 62) 5
*
*
Baldwin County 6 18.3 (16.1, 20.8) 41 (17, 55) 53 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
St. Clair County 6 18.3 (14.8, 22.4) 40 (9, 59) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Winston County 6 18.7 (12.4, 27.4) 39 (2, 62) 6
*
*
Clarke County 6 18.9 (12.9, 27.1) 38 (2, 62) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.4)
Autauga County 6 19.0 (14.4, 24.6) 37 (5, 61) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.0)
Chilton County 6 19.0 (13.9, 25.3) 36 (4, 61) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.3)
Jackson County 6 19.3 (14.8, 24.9) 35 (5, 60) 14 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 6.2)
Morgan County 6 19.6 (16.5, 23.2) 34 (8, 54) 29 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.5)
Calhoun County 6 19.7 (16.5, 23.5) 33 (8, 54) 28 rising rising trend 22.9 (12.8, 33.9)
Madison County 6 19.8 (17.9, 21.8) 32 (12, 47) 85 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.3, 3.0)
Washington County 6 19.8 (12.4, 30.6) 31 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Colbert County 6 20.0 (15.7, 25.3) 30 (5, 58) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.3, 6.9)
Marengo County 6 20.0 (12.1, 31.2) 29 (1, 62) 4 stable stable trend 4.4 (0.0, 9.0)
Sumter County 6 20.2 (12.0, 33.0) 28 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Randolph County 6 20.3 (13.3, 29.8) 27 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.3, 5.2)
Mobile County 6 20.4 (18.6, 22.4) 26 (11, 43) 101 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.1, 3.9)
Conecuh County 6 20.7 (11.6, 34.6) 25 (1, 62) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.4, 6.8)
Lauderdale County 6 20.7 (17.0, 25.0) 24 (5, 54) 24 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.4, 5.2)
Tuscaloosa County 6 20.7 (18.0, 23.7) 23 (7, 48) 45 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 2.9)
Elmore County 6 20.8 (16.8, 25.5) 22 (4, 55) 20 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.0, 6.6)
Barbour County 6 21.0 (14.7, 29.4) 21 (2, 61) 8 stable stable trend 4.6 (-1.4, 11.0)
Marion County 6 21.1 (15.2, 28.7) 20 (2, 60) 9 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.7, 7.7)
Choctaw County 6 21.2 (12.2, 34.8) 19 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Covington County 6 21.4 (15.5, 28.8) 18 (2, 60) 10 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.7, 9.0)
Houston County 6 21.6 (18.0, 25.7) 17 (4, 51) 27 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 4.7)
Limestone County 6 22.0 (18.2, 26.3) 16 (4, 49) 26 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.3, 5.3)
Clay County 6 22.1 (13.7, 34.7) 15 (1, 62) 4 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.8, 9.9)
Butler County 6 22.4 (14.5, 33.1) 14 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Lowndes County 6 22.9 (12.9, 38.6) 13 (1, 62) 3
*
*
Dallas County 6 22.9 (17.0, 30.3) 12 (1, 57) 11 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.2, 8.4)
Walker County 6 23.2 (18.7, 28.5) 11 (2, 49) 20 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.8)
Tallapoosa County 6 23.6 (17.8, 30.8) 10 (1, 55) 13 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 6.5)
Henry County 6 24.0 (15.9, 35.4) 9 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.2, 9.8)
Franklin County 6 24.8 (17.9, 33.6) 8 (1, 56) 9 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.0)
Escambia County 6 24.9 (18.8, 32.4) 7 (1, 51) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.5)
Lamar County 6 25.8 (15.7, 40.3) 6 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Hale County 6 27.4 (17.0, 42.0) 5 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-2.2, 8.7)
Chambers County 6 28.0 (21.2, 36.5) 4 (1, 45) 12 rising rising trend 7.8 (3.3, 12.5)
Bibb County 6 29.0 (20.6, 40.0) 3 (1, 49) 8 falling falling trend -18.8 (-32.1, -3.0)
Crenshaw County 6 29.1 (17.6, 45.2) 2 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.8, 9.1)
Fayette County 6 30.1 (20.0, 43.8) 1 (1, 55) 6 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.2, 7.3)
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/28/2023 2:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bullock, Cleburne, Greene, Perry, Wilcox

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top