Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 9.5 (9.1, 9.9) N/A 499 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 13.3 (13.2, 13.3) N/A 44,551 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.5)
Autauga County 6 11.7 (8.0, 16.5) 10 (1, 33) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.3, 6.8)
Baldwin County 6 7.2 (5.7, 8.9) 32 (18, 35) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.4)
Bibb County 6 18.1 (11.1, 27.9) 1 (1, 25) 4
*
*
Blount County 6 12.1 (8.5, 16.7) 8 (1, 31) 8 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.4, 11.8)
Calhoun County 6 16.3 (13.2, 20.0) 2 (1, 12) 20 rising rising trend 7.8 (4.9, 11.7)
Chambers County 6 9.4 (5.2, 15.4) 20 (2, 35) 3 stable stable trend 5.5 (-2.0, 15.9)
Cherokee County 6 9.6 (5.2, 16.5) 18 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Chilton County 6 8.4 (5.0, 13.3) 23 (5, 35) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.0, 7.2)
Coffee County 6 6.7 (4.0, 10.7) 33 (10, 35) 4
*
*
Colbert County 6 7.2 (4.4, 11.0) 31 (10, 35) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.1, 11.2)
Cullman County 6 8.4 (5.8, 11.6) 24 (8, 35) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.2, 5.7)
Dale County 6 11.7 (7.5, 17.2) 11 (1, 35) 5
*
*
DeKalb County 6 8.4 (5.7, 12.1) 22 (6, 35) 6 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.2, 9.5)
Elmore County 6 9.5 (6.8, 12.9) 19 (5, 35) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.6, 5.4)
Etowah County 6 8.9 (6.5, 11.9) 21 (7, 35) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-23.5, 4.9)
Franklin County 6 11.7 (6.9, 18.4) 12 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Houston County 6 8.3 (5.9, 11.3) 25 (9, 35) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.3, 5.3)
Jackson County 6 8.0 (5.0, 12.3) 27 (6, 35) 5 stable stable trend -5.9 (-47.4, 1.3)
Jefferson County 6 10.8 (9.7, 12.0) 14 (7, 22) 75 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.1, 3.9)
Lauderdale County 6 12.8 (9.7, 16.6) 7 (1, 24) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 6.2)
Lawrence County 6 10.6 (6.1, 17.0) 15 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Lee County 6 7.8 (5.9, 10.1) 28 (12, 35) 12 falling falling trend -19.6 (-35.2, -5.1)
Limestone County 6 10.5 (7.8, 13.7) 17 (4, 32) 11 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.1, 7.7)
Madison County 6 11.4 (10.0, 13.1) 13 (5, 21) 45 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.0, 6.7)
Marshall County 6 15.4 (12.2, 19.2) 3 (1, 14) 17 stable stable trend -13.0 (-27.6, 3.4)
Mobile County 6 7.4 (6.3, 8.7) 30 (19, 35) 33 stable stable trend -3.0 (-15.8, 0.4)
Montgomery County 6 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 34 (21, 35) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Morgan County 6 11.8 (9.2, 14.9) 9 (2, 26) 15 rising rising trend 8.3 (5.9, 11.9)
Russell County 6 6.6 (3.9, 10.4) 35 (12, 35) 4
*
*
Shelby County 6 10.5 (8.7, 12.6) 16 (6, 26) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.1, 5.6)
St. Clair County 6 8.2 (5.9, 11.3) 26 (9, 35) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.8)
Talladega County 6 13.9 (10.5, 18.2) 5 (1, 23) 12 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.7, 9.5)
Tallapoosa County 6 13.9 (9.3, 20.1) 6 (1, 29) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.6, 8.6)
Tuscaloosa County 6 7.6 (6.0, 9.6) 29 (15, 35) 16 falling falling trend -24.1 (-39.3, -12.6)
Walker County 6 14.0 (10.1, 18.8) 4 (1, 23) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 1.7)
Barbour County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Escambia County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 12:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Bullock, Butler, Choctaw, Clarke, Clay, Cleburne, Conecuh, Coosa, Covington, Crenshaw, Dallas, Escambia, Fayette, Geneva, Greene, Hale, Henry, Lamar, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Marion, Monroe, Perry, Pickens, Pike, Randolph, Sumter, Washington, Wilcox, Winston

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top