Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 15.8 (15.4, 16.3) N/A 943 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 19.0 (18.9, 19.0) N/A 71,841 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Jefferson County 6 14.3 (13.1, 15.6) 43 (22, 48) 111 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Madison County 6 19.0 (17.1, 21.0) 8 (2, 26) 79 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Mobile County 6 15.0 (13.4, 16.6) 36 (15, 47) 73 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Baldwin County 6 17.5 (15.4, 19.9) 13 (4, 39) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Montgomery County 6 17.5 (15.3, 20.1) 12 (3, 39) 44 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 3.7)
Shelby County 6 14.5 (12.4, 16.9) 41 (14, 51) 35 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Tuscaloosa County 6 16.8 (14.4, 19.6) 18 (4, 45) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Morgan County 6 20.4 (17.2, 24.0) 5 (1, 29) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.5)
Calhoun County 6 15.4 (12.6, 18.6) 34 (6, 51) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Houston County 6 16.5 (13.5, 20.1) 19 (3, 48) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Lauderdale County 6 17.1 (13.9, 20.9) 17 (2, 46) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.9)
Etowah County 6 15.5 (12.6, 18.9) 32 (5, 51) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.6)
Limestone County 6 19.1 (15.5, 23.2) 7 (1, 41) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Lee County 6 13.0 (10.5, 15.9) 48 (19, 54) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Cullman County 6 17.4 (14.1, 21.5) 14 (2, 47) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.4)
Marshall County 6 15.7 (12.5, 19.4) 26 (4, 51) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Elmore County 6 16.0 (12.5, 20.1) 23 (3, 51) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.0)
DeKalb County 6 15.6 (12.1, 19.8) 30 (3, 52) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Talladega County 6 13.9 (10.7, 17.8) 44 (7, 54) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 2.8)
St. Clair County 6 12.0 (9.2, 15.4) 51 (21, 54) 13 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.5, 0.0)
Walker County 6 14.8 (11.3, 19.1) 38 (4, 53) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Blount County 6 15.6 (11.9, 20.2) 29 (3, 53) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Tallapoosa County 6 20.8 (15.5, 27.5) 4 (1, 45) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.5, 5.1)
Coffee County 6 17.3 (13.0, 22.7) 16 (1, 51) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 3.9)
Jackson County 6 15.2 (11.3, 20.1) 35 (3, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 1.9)
Autauga County 6 16.0 (11.9, 21.2) 22 (2, 53) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 2.5)
Russell County 6 15.6 (11.5, 20.8) 27 (2, 53) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 4.7)
Lawrence County 6 21.0 (15.2, 28.4) 2 (1, 47) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.3, 6.4)
Marion County 6 20.8 (15.1, 28.3) 3 (1, 47) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 3.9)
Chambers County 6 18.8 (13.4, 25.9) 9 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.7)
Colbert County 6 10.7 (7.5, 14.8) 54 (24, 54) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.6, -0.8)
Dale County 6 13.7 (9.7, 19.0) 45 (5, 54) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 0.9)
Dallas County 6 14.6 (10.1, 20.4) 40 (2, 54) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 4.5)
Escambia County 6 15.5 (10.9, 21.6) 31 (1, 54) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.7)
Covington County 6 13.0 (8.8, 18.7) 46 (6, 54) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.7, 1.7)
Barbour County 6 17.4 (11.7, 25.3) 15 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.6, 6.8)
Chilton County 6 11.0 (7.4, 15.9) 53 (17, 54) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.5)
Franklin County 6 15.8 (10.6, 22.8) 25 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 4.7)
Pickens County 6 21.8 (14.1, 32.5) 1 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Randolph County 6 16.3 (10.3, 24.9) 20 (1, 54) 5
*
*
Geneva County 6 12.4 (7.8, 19.1) 50 (5, 54) 5 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.2, -0.6)
Pike County 6 13.0 (8.3, 19.6) 47 (3, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.3)
Winston County 6 14.9 (9.1, 23.1) 37 (1, 54) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.3, 0.9)
Cherokee County 6 11.4 (6.8, 18.2) 52 (6, 54) 4
*
*
Clarke County 6 12.6 (7.8, 19.7) 49 (4, 54) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.5)
Marengo County 6 17.8 (10.9, 27.7) 11 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.9, 3.2)
Monroe County 6 14.8 (9.1, 23.0) 39 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Bibb County 6 16.1 (9.9, 25.0) 21 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.6)
Fayette County 6 15.9 (9.6, 25.6) 24 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 4.9)
Washington County 6 18.3 (10.9, 29.3) 10 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Henry County 6 14.5 (8.3, 24.0) 42 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.4, 2.0)
Macon County 6 15.5 (8.8, 25.5) 33 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.3, 6.1)
Conecuh County 6 19.5 (10.9, 32.9) 6 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Clay County 6 15.6 (8.9, 26.4) 28 (1, 54) 3 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.2, 4.4)
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 7:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bullock, Butler, Choctaw, Cleburne, Coosa, Crenshaw, Greene, Hale, Lamar, Lowndes, Perry, Sumter, Wilcox

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top