Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Leukemia (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 12.3 (11.9, 12.7) N/A 718 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 13.9 (13.9, 14.0) N/A 51,518 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Cleburne County 6 22.4 (13.5, 35.2) 1 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Lowndes County 6 22.0 (12.3, 37.1) 2 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Crenshaw County 6 21.6 (12.2, 35.4) 3 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Tallapoosa County 6 16.3 (11.7, 22.2) 4 (1, 43) 9 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.3, 5.7)
Elmore County 6 16.2 (12.7, 20.4) 5 (1, 38) 15 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.1, 10.1)
Pike County 6 15.0 (9.7, 22.4) 6 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Butler County 6 15.0 (8.9, 24.1) 7 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Marshall County 6 14.9 (11.8, 18.5) 8 (2, 41) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 5.0)
Baldwin County 6 14.9 (12.9, 17.1) 9 (3, 28) 44 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 5.9)
Morgan County 6 14.7 (12.0, 17.8) 10 (2, 40) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Walker County 6 14.6 (11.0, 19.1) 11 (2, 45) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.8, 5.2)
Dallas County 6 14.4 (9.7, 20.6) 12 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.4, 7.6)
Jackson County 6 13.8 (9.9, 18.8) 13 (2, 48) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 6.5)
Chambers County 6 13.3 (8.7, 19.7) 14 (1, 50) 6
*
*
Autauga County 6 13.3 (9.6, 18.0) 15 (2, 49) 9
*
*
Talladega County 6 13.2 (10.1, 17.0) 16 (3, 47) 13 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.4, 9.2)
Marion County 6 13.2 (8.4, 19.8) 17 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.0, 8.6)
Pickens County 6 13.2 (7.2, 22.2) 18 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Calhoun County 6 13.1 (10.4, 16.3) 19 (4, 45) 17 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.0, 5.8)
Tuscaloosa County 6 12.9 (10.8, 15.3) 20 (5, 43) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 2.2)
Bibb County 6 12.9 (7.4, 21.0) 21 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-6.4, 8.8)
Etowah County 6 12.8 (10.2, 16.0) 22 (4, 46) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.6)
Colbert County 6 12.6 (9.1, 17.1) 23 (3, 49) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 6.6)
Limestone County 6 12.5 (9.7, 15.8) 24 (4, 48) 14 falling falling trend -14.8 (-26.1, -1.4)
Cherokee County 6 12.3 (7.6, 19.4) 25 (2, 50) 4
*
*
Winston County 6 12.1 (6.8, 19.9) 26 (2, 50) 4 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.1, 0.9)
Mobile County 6 11.9 (10.6, 13.4) 27 (13, 43) 58 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.2)
Madison County 6 11.9 (10.5, 13.6) 28 (11, 44) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 2.1)
Montgomery County 6 11.9 (10.0, 14.1) 29 (9, 46) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.0)
Cullman County 6 11.9 (8.9, 15.6) 30 (4, 49) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.5)
St. Clair County 6 11.9 (9.0, 15.3) 31 (5, 49) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 2.3)
Russell County 6 11.8 (8.2, 16.4) 32 (3, 50) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 7.0)
Barbour County 6 11.6 (6.9, 18.7) 33 (2, 50) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 6 11.5 (10.4, 12.6) 34 (18, 43) 88 stable stable trend 6.5 (-0.9, 11.7)
Shelby County 6 11.5 (9.6, 13.6) 35 (12, 47) 27 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 4.3)
Monroe County 6 11.4 (6.5, 19.0) 36 (2, 50) 3
*
*
DeKalb County 6 11.4 (8.4, 15.2) 37 (5, 50) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.2, 5.2)
Lauderdale County 6 11.3 (8.6, 14.6) 38 (7, 50) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.0)
Covington County 6 11.1 (7.2, 16.4) 39 (3, 50) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.4, 6.1)
Blount County 6 11.0 (7.8, 15.3) 40 (5, 50) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.8)
Franklin County 6 10.8 (6.5, 16.9) 41 (3, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.6, 4.7)
Coffee County 6 10.5 (7.2, 14.9) 42 (6, 50) 7 falling falling trend -11.2 (-23.4, -4.1)
Lawrence County 6 10.4 (6.5, 16.1) 43 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.3, 8.0)
Chilton County 6 10.4 (6.7, 15.3) 44 (5, 50) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.5, 5.8)
Randolph County 6 10.0 (5.4, 17.1) 45 (3, 50) 3
*
*
Escambia County 6 9.7 (6.1, 14.9) 46 (6, 50) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-2.8, 10.7)
Houston County 6 9.7 (7.3, 12.5) 47 (16, 50) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.6)
Dale County 6 8.7 (5.5, 13.1) 48 (11, 50) 5 rising rising trend 39.5 (15.0, 70.7)
Lee County 6 8.5 (6.5, 10.9) 49 (28, 50) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 5.6)
Geneva County 6 8.4 (4.7, 14.1) 50 (10, 50) 3
*
*
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 3:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top